I hitchslapped her into silence on twitter
me 23 hours ago :
@SyimaAslam funny how the qurans translations change retrospectively and post hoc to fit with modern science. Yay for lingustic gymnastics
@SyimaAslam can you name me one scientific fact in the quran, yet to be discovered by modern science ?
@SyimaAslam or any new science directly extrapolated from a religious scripture at the time the scriptures were first given ?
@SyimaAslam
http://tribune.com.pk/story/238607/the-science-of-scriptures/ … … on the pseudoscience of ijaz to validate pre-dispositioned sentimental beliefs
her REPLY (notice how she dodges my questions)
- thank you for your interesting comments. What I wrote is not meant as any type of validation of Qur'anic science, on which
- there are many differing views. I was writing about my own personal experience and what spoke to me - this is not something
- that everyone either will agree with or is required to agree with. Thank you for the article, it was a really interesting read
my 2nd REPLY( which she hasn't answered yet and she has read and not replied to. she has though tweeted other stuff after my last reply)
@syimaaslam different views?99% of scientists laugh at how religious apologists alter scripture to retrofit it around modern scienc
@syimaaslam it's considered crank and fringe of a fringe thought in scientific community, on par with the flat earth movement !
@syimaaslam all u have is charlatans like keith moore and bucaille who were paid very handsomely by saudis and dindani to endorse ijaz
@SyimaAslam correct me if I'm wrong but did u assume that the duplicitous reinterpreting/retranslating of ancient scriptures to fit in ..1/2
@SyimaAslam with with modern science had some kind of credibility/integrity amongst a good percentage of scientists ? 2/2