Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →
↑ ↓
CEMB → Forum → Life, The Universe & Everything → Philosophy → What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts

افضل الايام
by akay
Today at 10:26 AM
Ramadan
by akay
Today at 12:02 AM
Russia invades Ukraine
Yesterday at 06:30 PM
Gaza assault
February 26, 2025, 09:25 AM
New Britain
February 25, 2025, 08:11 PM
Do humans have needed kno...
February 25, 2025, 03:50 AM
اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 23, 2025, 09:40 AM
What music are you listen...
by zeca
February 22, 2025, 09:50 PM
Lights on the way
by akay
February 22, 2025, 02:56 PM
German nationalist party ...
February 21, 2025, 10:31 AM
Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM
Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?

 (Read 6060 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     OP - March 02, 2014, 03:36 AM
    Of course, this is based on the assumption that they need reform.
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #1 - March 02, 2014, 04:47 AM
    Basal is forming or belonging to a bottom layer or base i.e. "basal epidermal cells". Do you mean biased or is there something I'm not getting?
    `But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
     `Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: `we're all mad here. I'm mad.  You're mad.'
     `How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
     `You must be,' said the Cat, `or you wouldn't have come here.'
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #2 - March 02, 2014, 04:00 PM
    Hi Quod, the basal assumptions are generally referenced as the three following assumptions:

    1) I assume that the universe exists.
    2) We can learn from the universe.
    3) Models with predictive capability are more useful than models without predictive capability.
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #3 - March 02, 2014, 04:09 PM
    You might find this interesting:

    Presuppositionalism & Properly Basic Beliefs
    by Ozymandias Ramses II
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H2ZPjd9J6vE
    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #4 - March 02, 2014, 04:13 PM
    I will definitely watch it, thanks Smiley

    The first minute has already got me hooked.
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #5 - March 02, 2014, 10:45 PM
    Quote from: Qtian on March 02, 2014, 03:36 AM
    Of course, this is based on the assumption that they need reform.

    Quote from: Qtian on March 02, 2014, 04:00 PM
    Hi Quod, the basal assumptions are generally referenced as the three following assumptions:

    1) I assume that the universe exists.
    2) We can learn from the universe.
    3) Models with predictive capability are more useful than models without predictive capability.

    Ok, say you want to make adjustments. You can get either of:

    1a) I assume the universe doesn't exist, or
    1b) I assume I don't have a clue whether the universe exists or not.

    and:

    2a) We cannot learn from the universe, or
    2b) We have no idea if we can learn from the universe or not.

    and:

    3a) Models with predictive capability are not more useful than models without predictive capability, or
    3b) I have NFI if models with predictive capability are more useful, or not, than models without predictive capability.

    Which adjustments do you want, and what are you going to do with them?

    (assuming you live long enough to implement them, which is unlikely if you aren't prepared to learn from the universe)

    Note that 3a) and 3b) are analogous to saying that science and engineering don't work, or that you don't know if science and engineering work or not.
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #6 - March 03, 2014, 03:53 AM
    Hi Osmanthus, interesting selection Tongue
    My reformations of the assumptions would be something along these lines:

    1) I assume that the universe exists.
    1*) I assume that the world that I can observe exists.

    I don't see a drastic need to edit the other assumptions.
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #7 - March 03, 2014, 06:16 AM
    The world you can observe is part of the universe, yes? So how is the change useful?
    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #8 - March 03, 2014, 07:15 AM
    Quote from: Qtian on March 03, 2014, 03:53 AM
    Hi Osmanthus, interesting selection Tongue
    My reformations of the assumptions would be something along these lines:

    1) I assume that the universe exists.
    1*) I assume that the world that I can observe exists.

    But everyone operates as though more than what we can observe exists. We cannot escape that assumption. We don't even literally make that assumption. We function and take it for granted.
    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #9 - March 03, 2014, 02:09 PM
    Fair enough, I appreciate that. I just wanted to clarify that I observe through my senses.  However, I now see that it was already inferred.
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #10 - March 03, 2014, 02:13 PM
    Do you guys think that it's worth making a YT video on the peanut butter argument?
    It would most likely be for satire purposes.
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #11 - March 03, 2014, 02:20 PM
    What view do you guys take with reference to the basal assumptions and anthropocentrism?
    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #12 - March 03, 2014, 08:33 PM
    Quote from: Qtian on March 03, 2014, 02:13 PM
    Do you guys think that it's worth making a YT video on the peanut butter argument?
    It would most likely be for satire purposes.

    For satire purposes perhaps.
    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • What adjustments would you make to the basal assumptions?
     Reply #13 - March 03, 2014, 08:43 PM
    Quote from: Qtian on March 03, 2014, 02:20 PM
    What view do you guys take with reference to the basal assumptions and anthropocentrism?

    I view anthropocentrism to be the most unfortunate and destructive conviction of human kind. An obscene mutant belief made of arrogance, ignorance and short-sightedness.
    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »