Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →
↑ ↓
CEMB → Forum → News and Events → International news and issues → Laïcité

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts

Gaza assault
Today at 09:25 AM
New Britain
Yesterday at 08:11 PM
Do humans have needed kno...
Yesterday at 03:50 AM
اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 23, 2025, 09:40 AM
What music are you listen...
by zeca
February 22, 2025, 09:50 PM
Lights on the way
by akay
February 22, 2025, 02:56 PM
German nationalist party ...
February 21, 2025, 10:31 AM
Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM
Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM
Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM
Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM
Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Laïcité

 (Read 1448 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Laïcité
     OP - January 09, 2015, 11:14 PM
    What do you think of France's strict secularism? Does it go too far? Does it not go far enough?

    I've spent the whole day trying to explain to a friend why it does not discriminate against Muslims, and that Catholicism shed the same tears and sang the same tune as Muslims are at the moment. But he just doesn't seem to see that side of the argument. He says that simply because Muslims are "most affected" it must, by default, be anti-Muslim.

     
  • Laïcité
     Reply #1 - January 13, 2015, 04:07 PM
    Well, it was developed at a time when Islam wasn't on the radar in France, and the Catholic church was the big enemy of freedom.

    Now France has a lot of Muslims, Islam gets the same treatment.
    Free speech is the source of most other freedoms
  • Laïcité, a secular Israel
     Reply #2 - January 13, 2015, 05:02 PM
    JE SUIS CHARLIE, JE SUIS JUIF, J'ÉTAIS MUSULMAIN.
    Don't let Netenyahu seize the agenda.
    A SECULAR ISRAEL: Israel and Palestine would work towards a "one-state" solution by slow confidence-building measures. A two-state proposal would tend towards the recurrent conflicts of Pakistan- India. The secular state would guarantee security for any community asking for it (atheists, Jews, Arab Muslims, Armenian Christians …) but maintain a strict separation between religion and state (cf the French constitution). Government would forbid religious symbols in parliament and court, classify Jerusalem sites as museum areas (cf Ataturk & Hagia Sofia), allow multiple holy days. "The land given by God to the Jews" would be redefined or disallowed as a policy objective.
    The achievement of trustworthy police force is essential to peace-building. See the police force of Northern Ireland.  Internal security would be enforced by police with parallel institutions at first. Officers would have baccalaureate (i.e. A-level) qualifications in police procedures, good command of Hebrew, Arabic and English and proficiency in "history of ideas" (see Grayling): this would include Greek philosophy, the three monotheisms, plus some science-based ethics, e.g. evolutionary theory and cosmology. Other ranks of police would show lower proficiency. Training within a specific religion would be allowed only out of school and within a religious establishment. Salaries and scrutiny would reduce the possibilities of bribery. Promotion would be demonstrated record of non-partisan application of law. The Israel-Palestine parallel police forces would show these proficiencies and  have equal opportunities recruitment. 
     
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »