Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 30, 2024, 01:32 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 30, 2024, 09:01 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
November 30, 2024, 08:53 AM

New Britain
November 29, 2024, 08:17 AM

Gaza assault
by zeca
November 27, 2024, 07:13 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 24, 2024, 06:05 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 22, 2024, 06:45 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Slavery in Islam

 (Read 1697 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Slavery in Islam
     OP - January 19, 2017, 03:10 AM

    Many societies through history have practiced slavery, and Muslim societies were no exception. Slavery institutionalized by Islam. In beginning they didn’t started straight way to trade slave until Muhammad went to Medina and gained power.
    The most shocking news is that Islam authorizes the taking of slaves as spoils of war. From the days that Muhammad drew his sword to rob and conquer non-Muslims to this very day, Muslims have been permitted and taking non-Muslims, and even other race like black Muslims, as slaves.
    Islam’s approach to slavery added the idea that freedom was the natural state of affairs for human beings and in the line with this it limited the opportunities to enslave people, commended the freeing of slaves and regulated the way slaves were treated:

    •   Islam greatly limited those who could be enslaved and under what circumstances (although these restrictions were often evaded)
    •   Islam treated slaves as human beings as well as property
    •   Islam banned the mistreatment of slaves – indeed the tradition repeatedly stresses the importance of treating slaves with kindness and compassion
    •   Islam allowed slaves to achieve their freedom and made freeing slaves a virtuous act
    •   Islam barred Muslims from enslaving other Muslims but essential nature of slavery remained the same under Islam, as elsewhere.

    It involved serious breaches of human rights and however well they were treated, the slaves still had restricted freedom, and when the law was not obeyed, their lives could be very unpleasant.

    If we see into Quran which justifies slavery and mentions slave in different occasion. Here are some relevant verses:


    33:50 –

     

    "Prophet, We have made lawful to you the wives to whom you have granted dowries and the slave girls whom God has given you as booty."

    23:5-6
     

    -   "... Except with their wives and slave girls, for these are lawful to them:..."

                The passage's context here (not quoted in full) details how Muslim males are allowed to have sexual relations with their wives and slave girls. Implicit in this is that Muslim males had slave-concubines.  70:30 is basically a repeat of 23:5.

      There are so many people gives clear description of Muhammad having relations with at least one of his Coptic slave women. Muhammad had sexual relations with MARIYAH, his slave. Ibn Sa'd says that Muhammad "liked Mariyah, who was of white complexion, with curly hair and pretty."  [Taken from Ibn Sa'd's "Kitab al-Tabaqat al-Kabir" (Book of the Major Classes), p151].

    In Bukhari’s Hadith clearly mentioned that Muslims had taken female slaves and had sex with them. And Muhammad approved of this as well.
    Even also state in this Hadith that Muslims attacked the Banu Mustaliq, and took slaves and Muhammad Okayed with the rape female prisoners.

    So in Quran and lot of others resources tell us how Islam used the slave for their purposed.

    In fact Islam give a new definition of slavery by his own way. Time and time again, slavery in Islam is abused. The west done with slavery, then Islam continues it, and with that, the abuses go on.

    I am turning to atheism and abandoning the religious ways of my parent in response to radical Islam and extremism, as those ideologies inspire atrocious acts against others, including other Muslims. I seek better life where religion does not trespass into my private lives.
  • Slavery in Islam
     Reply #1 - January 20, 2017, 10:20 PM

    Revolting slaves though :-)

    Quote
    Mamluk (Arabic: مملوك mamlūk (singular), مماليك mamālīk (plural), meaning "property" , also transliterated as mamlouk, mamluq, mamluke, mameluk, mameluke, mamaluke or marmeluke) is an Arabic designation for slaves. The term is most commonly used to refer to Muslim slave soldiers and Muslim rulers of slave origin.


    More specifically, it refers to:

    Ghaznavid dynasty in Khorasan (977-1186)
    Khwarazmian dynasty in Transoxania (1077–1231)
    Mamluk Dynasty (Delhi) (1206–1290)
    Mamluk Sultanate (Cairo) (1250–1517)
    Mamluk dynasty of Iraq (1704–1831, under Ottoman Iraq)

    The most enduring Mamluk realm was the knightly military caste in Egypt in the Middle Ages that rose from the ranks of slave soldiers who were mainly Turkic peoples,[1] but also Copts,[2]Circassians,[3] Abkhazians,[4][5][6] and Georgians,.[7][8][9] Many Mamluks could also be of Balkan origin (Albanians, Greeks, and South Slavs).[10][11] The "mamluk phenomenon", as David Ayalon dubbed the creation of the specific warrior class,[12] was of great political importance and was extraordinarily long-lived, lasting from the ninth to the nineteenth centuries.

    Over time, mamluks became a powerful military knightly caste in various societies that were controlled by Muslim rulers.

    Particularly in Egypt, but also in the Levant, Mesopotamia, and India, mamluks held political and military power. In some cases, they attained the rank of sultan, while in others they held regional power as emirs or beys. Most notably, mamluk factions seized the sultanate for themselves centered on Egypt and Syria as the Mamluk Sultanate (1250–1517). The Mamluk Sultanate famously defeated the Ilkhanate at the Battle of Ain Jalut; they had earlier fought the Crusaders in 1154-1169 and 1213-1221, effectively driving them out of Egypt and the Levant. In 1302 they formally expelled the last Crusaders from the Levant, ending the era of the Crusades.[13]

    While mamluks were purchased, their status was above ordinary slaves, who were not allowed to carry weapons or perform certain tasks. In places such as Egypt from the Ayyubid dynasty to the time of Muhammad Ali of Egypt, mamluks were considered to be “true lords" and "true warriors" with social status above the general population in Egypt and the Levant.[2][14]

    In the Middle Ages, soon after the Mamlukes took up the practice of furusiyya "chivalry"; the Arabic term for a knight was fāris (plural fursān), although Mamluk knights were slaves until their service ended. The faris and the notion of furusiyya originated in pre-Muslim Persian brotherhoods, but within the Muslim world became prized as ideal warriors.

    Fursān — whether free like Usama ibn Munqidh or unfree professional warriors like ghilman and mamluks — were trained in the use of various weapons such as the sword, spear, lance, javelin, club, bow and arrow, and tabarzin or "saddle ax" (hence the Mamluk bodyguards known as the tabardariyyah) They were trained in wrestling, and their martial skills were honed first on foot as piéton and then perfected when mounted.[15] They were popularly used as heavy knightly cavalry by a number of different Islamic kingdoms and empires, including the Ayyubid dynasty and the Ottoman Empire.


    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »