there's the sana manuscripts, which carbon dating dates to about 60 years after mo's death, but this is rejected by islamic scholars(the many differences with the 21st century quran obviously being a reason)
Really? It is rejected by Islamic scholars because it is different from 21st century ones? Even though it is carbon dated and it uses the Kufa script which was the actual script used in those times. That is quite revealing about what Islamic scholars will accept as authentic. Makes you wonder about their methodology when assessing whether a Hadith is authentic...
ETA: So do they claim that it is a forgery?