Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


الحبيب من يشبه اكثر؟؟؟
by akay
April 09, 2025, 01:56 PM

New Britain
April 08, 2025, 05:35 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
April 08, 2025, 01:08 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
April 08, 2025, 09:37 AM

عيد مبارك للجميع! ^_^
by akay
March 29, 2025, 01:09 PM

Eid-Al-Fitr
by akay
March 29, 2025, 08:40 AM

Ramadan
by akay
March 29, 2025, 08:39 AM

Turkish mafia reliance
March 24, 2025, 06:00 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
March 22, 2025, 10:19 AM

افضل الايام
by akay
March 21, 2025, 10:57 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
March 21, 2025, 07:07 AM

Gaza assault
March 19, 2025, 09:04 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument

 (Read 2017 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument
     OP - July 31, 2014, 07:51 AM


    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument
     Reply #1 - August 03, 2014, 02:45 PM

    1. It is possible that a maximally great Thundercat exists
    2. If it is possible that a maximally great Thundercat exists, then a maximally great Thundercat exists in some possible world
    3. If a maximally great Thundercat exists in some possible world, then it exists in every possible world
    4. If a maximally great Thundercat exists in every possible world, then it exists in the actual world
    5. Therefore, a maximally great Thundercat exists

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • One of the flaws of the Modal Ontological Argument
     Reply #2 - August 03, 2014, 03:03 PM

    Lol. I'm not sure how the arguer gets to p3 from p2 anyways, it goes against axiomatic set theory.

    My mind runs, I can never catch it even if I get a head start.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »