Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Gaza assault
Yesterday at 09:25 AM

New Britain
February 25, 2025, 08:11 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 25, 2025, 03:50 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 23, 2025, 09:40 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
February 22, 2025, 09:50 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 22, 2025, 02:56 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 21, 2025, 10:31 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Parallel legal systems

 (Read 1277 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Parallel legal systems
     OP - March 23, 2015, 09:30 PM

    https://lawyerssecularsociety.wordpress.com/2015/03/23/the-insurmountable-problems-of-parallel-legal-systems/

    Quote
    MARCH 23, 2015 BY LAWSECSOC
    The insurmountable problems of parallel legal systems
    By LSS member Daniel Anderson

    The attempts to establish parallel legal systems can in fact be seen as a project to transfer legal rights away from people and to groups instead.

    Certain groups, usually based on a culture or religion, are deemed by proponents of parallel legal systems as worthy of having their own separate legal rights, and so parallel legal systems are consequently proposed to make this a reality.

    But this attempt to transfer legal rights to groups causes problems that the advocates of parallel legal systems can only fail to address. Below are some of these problems.


    Problem: not all people within the group will actually be part of the group

    Some people may decide not to be part of a group by choice. Some people may be unwilling to be part of a group due to that group being perceived as having a marginalised status within society. Furthermore, some people may decide to voluntarily leave a group. And some people may be forced out of a group due to being declared ‘heretics’.

    What happens to all these people if legal rights are to be transferred to the group that they supposedly belong to? The advocates of parallel legal systems are silent on this point.

    Problem: not all people within a group think the same way

    Advocates of parallel legal systems seem blind to the reality of human individuality. Put another way, they seem unable to comprehend the simple fact that not everyone within a group will think exactly the same about everything as other individuals within that group.

    Therefore, who gets to decide which thoughts within the group take precedence over others when granting that group legal rights? Unfortunately, we get no answers from the advocates of parallel legal systems.

    Problem: people within groups can cause harm to each other too

    This is an ugly fact, and it is one which proponents of parallel legal systems often hurriedly gloss over. This observation is perhaps best encapsulated by the term “minority within a minority”. And such scenarios inevitably crop up because the rights of minorities within the group end up being sacrificed to the deemed needs of the collective whole.

    .......





    When you are a Bear of Very Little Brain, and you Think of Things, you find sometimes that a Thing which seemed very Thingish inside you is quite different when it gets out into the open and has other people looking at it.


    A.A. Milne,

    "We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
  • Parallel legal systems
     Reply #1 - March 24, 2015, 01:38 PM

    All very good points. I personally feel that too many gloss over the problem of "minority within a minority".
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »