Acknowledging that the Quran is not infallible, is acknowledging that you are not following the one true religion. To many muslims its not about reaching out to the unknown, its about reaching out to the known. Because they don't believe Islam to be true, they know with 110% certainity that the religion they were born into, is the one true religion. Such "knowledge" is perilous, because it has direct connections to the religious zealotry we unforntunately see in too many muslims.
And its the very zealotry which lays the foundation for the maltreatment of those whose beliefs differs to yours. The muslim masses in too many muslim majority countries continue to maltreat religious minorties, and all our attention is on IS, who just happen to be the tip of the ice berg. If we want to curb violent extremism, we need to extingiush religious zealotry first.
Interpretation itself contradicts the infallible concept.
Precisely. The very fact that the eternal words of an all knowing god have to be contextualized and not be read literally, otherwise they are prone to causing havoc, proves without a shadow of doubt that the Quran is not infallible. Surely an all knowing god would be able to do better than this?
In that case Hassan's position is much more logical, you admit that the Quran is inspired by god, because lets admit that many of the spiritual teachings in holy books can be inspiring for spiritual and religious people, but its not infallible, because it also has many nasty bits, which are directly inspiring people to commit atrocities. Saying those bits are taken out of context, is nothing but a cop out, and acknowledgement of your all knowing god not really knowing what he was doing while revealing the Quran. Keep the good bits, get rid of the nasty ones.