Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


News From Syria
by zeca
Today at 12:54 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
Yesterday at 03:51 PM

New Britain
Yesterday at 03:41 PM

Ashes to beads: South Kor...
December 03, 2024, 09:44 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 30, 2024, 09:01 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
November 30, 2024, 08:53 AM

Gaza assault
by zeca
November 27, 2024, 07:13 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 24, 2024, 06:05 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 22, 2024, 06:45 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Law Lords back Qatada deportation

 (Read 3310 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Law Lords back Qatada deportation
     OP - February 18, 2009, 12:32 PM

    Well, it's about time they saw some sense...

    The Law Lords have given the go-ahead for the deportation from the UK of the radical cleric Abu Qatada.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7896457.stm

    Atheism is a non-prophet organization.

    The sleeper has awakened -  Dune

    Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day Give him a religion, and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish!
  • Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
     Reply #1 - February 18, 2009, 09:28 PM

    Good riddance already.

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
     Reply #2 - February 18, 2009, 10:44 PM

    Yes, good riddance.

    It's simple - people like him who hate everything this country stands for and openly supports and expounds extremist ideology - should get out.

    End of story.
  • Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
     Reply #3 - February 18, 2009, 11:47 PM

    I have a question.  Why is Britain, or any other country for that matter, accepting asylum seekers from Jordan?  What's so  wrong with Jordan?  Its not a dictatorship, its not in the throes of a civil war, its not crippled by poverty, it doesn't stone people to death. 

    Jordan is not perfect, of course, but nor is Texas.  Does Britain accept asylum seekers from Texas?  If not, why Jordan?

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
     Reply #4 - February 20, 2009, 12:20 PM

    I have a question.  Why is Britain, or any other country for that matter, accepting asylum seekers from Jordan?  What's so  wrong with Jordan?  Its not a dictatorship, its not in the throes of a civil war, its not crippled by poverty, it doesn't stone people to death. 

    Jordan is not perfect, of course, but nor is Texas.  Does Britain accept asylum seekers from Texas?  If not, why Jordan?


    I dunno, beats me too. Jordan does have honor killings legalized in their Penal Code, any man can kill not just his wife but any of his close female relatives if he catches them doing something inappropriate. Texas doesn't have that. I do support giving asylum to any potential victim of honor killing, but giving asylum to terrorists or rabble rousers? Thats' totally unneccessary, and puts Britain's own citizens at risk. Not to mention that the people who could die from terrorist attacks masterminded by such scums have as much right to their safety as these people do. IMO, its due to certain far left politicians and viewpoints, who go all out to support the human rights of terrorists and the most extreme fundamentalists, but forget the rights of their victims.

    Here's another such man, Mullah Krekar, apparently the "darling" of Norwegian leftists, who oppose his arrest or deportation. This man supports harsh Shariah punishments in Kurdistan, IMO the rights of the women to life whom he'd sentence to stoning for adultery far outweigh his right to asylum in Norway. Unfortunately some Leftists blur the distinction between the victimizer and victim.http://www.pwhce.org/krekar.html

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
     Reply #5 - February 20, 2009, 01:10 PM

    I have a question.  Why is Britain, or any other country for that matter, accepting asylum seekers from Jordan?  What's so  wrong with Jordan?  Its not a dictatorship, its not in the throes of a civil war, its not crippled by poverty, it doesn't stone people to death. 

    Jordan is not perfect, of course, but nor is Texas.  Does Britain accept asylum seekers from Texas?  If not, why Jordan?


    As far as I was aware, Jordan was one of the biggest hosts (per capita) in the world of refugees and not the other way around? 

    They probably take on a lot of refugees from Iraq, and at one time was crippling the nations infrastructure.  Perhaps its refugees from Iraq, who have directly come through Jordan?  Just guessing though..

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »