I am a bit annoyed! This is what somebody responded to me when I politely questioned the historiographical reliability of the science of hadith:
Well, we believe that history from a secular perspective can be extremely biased.
Why is a period referred to as the dark ages, when it was only the west that was throwing their waste outside of their windows, suffering from plagues, and never bathed?
At the same time, Muslims in Andalus had street lights, sewage system, pefume, knowledge, knew the earth was not flat etc...
Secular history doesnt mention the truth about the oppression the Native Americans suffered.
History doesnt mention the oppression that colonialism unleashed upon the world.
It doesnt mention the true role of The East India Company in the Hind
It doesnt mention the true role of Lawrence of Arabia
Double standards are such an ugly thing
Firstly, he has just shown he doesn't know anything about history and just come up with a load of bullshit generalisations and assumptions.
And secondly, why do Muslims often respond to a criticism of anything to do with Islam with a criticism of the west, instead of defending what is criticised?!