This is good. It's about the blasphemy law that was recently passed in Ireland. A Swedish MP has filed a complaint with the EU on human rights grounds.
![Afro](https://www.councilofexmuslims.com/Smileys/custom/afro.gif)
Irish defamation law and EU human rightsThe new legislation has made blasphemous speech illegal, which means that a citizen of the European Union can be punished for making a comment that is determined to be offensive to a substantial number of followers of a religion.
The punishment of a fine, up to ?25,000, can hardly be consistent with human-rights obligations under the EU treaties, and I have therefore filed a complaint to the European Commission.
Mandatory practicing of a religion is something that most of us associate with times long gone. But this is exactly what a blasphemy law amounts to. A statement is blasphemous only within a religious context, and the systematic avoidance of blasphemy is part of religious practice.
Thus, a law against blasphemy is an obligation to live your life according to the religious beliefs of others.Defining blasphemy as speech that offends a substational number of religious followers gives the churches the power to gradually expand the application of the law. A not too far-fetched guess is that statements threatening the power of religious leaders will awaken the strongest reactions and therefore be considered the most offensive ones, resulting in punishment by the state.
Article 6.1 in the current EU treaty establishes that the Union "is founded on the principles of liberty, democracy, respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms, and the rule of law, principles which are common to the member states."
Free speech is a human right, a fundamental freedom and a necessary condition for democracy. Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights describes free speech as everyone's right to freedom of expression and adds: "This right shall include freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers."
There is no obvious reason why free speech should not include the right to characterise religious views or symbols in a way that some might find offensive.
All of which I thoroughly agree with.