For the second time in two days, I've seen (online) two different muslim guys doing Dawah and they begin with a bag and put plastic and metal in it and start shaking. And say, if I shake this for million years, do you think this will become into a toy. They conclude with #atheistLogic
I find it very silly.
Now I know how to counter that but my knowledge might not be enough.
Counters please?
mosster ., tell those fools the following..
Toy is defined as
"an object for a child to play with, typically a model or miniature replica of something" and this object need not have any shape as long as child enjoys with it. Answering the question
do you think this will become into a toy?Answer is Yes ...
metal/plastic.. shaking .. baking cutting/eroding/heating/melting/ reshaping will make a shape.,...... some shape....., if the child enjoys/plays with it, It is a toy.
But tell those IDIOTS, that toy/object will not have life as defined in biology. Now their idea that these rascals use for Islamic Dawah with such silly ulterior motive is for fools.
Fools can only fool fools., They can't fool those who can use common sense.
....
Some shape/some structure/some species is there means, that "there must be a designer " .. That is Ooold wine in new Islamic bottle., It is so called
"Teleological argument" well known much before the birth of Islam... before the birth of the word "Muhammad".. Ask the fools to read Tim Holt web link on
Philosophy of Religion or wiki links on that subject.
This "
Teleological argument" for the existence of some super intelligent fecal matter is in fact initiated by the schools of Socrates Plato, and Aristotle Not by any religion and Not by Islam .. Tell the fools Quran is copy/pasted book of its time put together by multiple authors who never read what other wrote.. So you have copy pasted repetitive rubbish with rhyming Arabic words. Using that some one can make sonnets and sing some Arabic songs. Nothing more and nothing less.
Now also tell those fools that is only one of the argument for the existence of god . There are many other arguments t they could use and run in circles doing dawah to some guys walking on the road., ..such as
God’s Intrinsic Probability., Reformed Epistemology., Pascal’s Wager., The Ontological Argument., The Cosmological Argument .,
The Teleological Argument., The Argument from Analogy., The Argument from Fine-Tuning., The Argument from Desire
The Argument from Consciousness., The Moral Argument., The Argument from Religious Experience., The Argument from Miracles., etc..etc..
The best argument I could think of using for this existance super doper spaghetti monster/ cloud in the sky/ god/morphogenetic biological species ..whatever are the following
1). "The Moral Argument of their times" .,
2).
Argument from Religious Experience....So-called spirituality.... .
3). or or ....We have freedom to believe in god as you have freedom Not believe in god"..
well ask them to read CEMB..
with best wishes
yeezevee
Topic: Creation in the Qur'an