Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


German nationalist party ...
Today at 10:31 AM

New Britain
February 17, 2025, 11:51 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 15, 2025, 04:00 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Dawahganda: Atoms & Sub-atomic Particles in the Qur'an

 (Read 1534 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Dawahganda: Atoms & Sub-atomic Particles in the Qur'an
     OP - February 08, 2014, 02:34 AM

    Debunked here - http://dawahganda.blogspot.com/2013/01/atoms-sub-atomic-particles-in-quran.html

    Here is a snippet;

    Dawahganda Argument

    1. Original Argument

    Premises
    1) The Qur'an uses the word "dharra" (ذَرَّةٍ)
    2) "dharra" (ذَرَّةٍ)" means "atom" (as per the modern Atomic theory)

    Conclusion
    Therefore, Qur'an contained knowledge of atoms (before anyone knew).

    2. Updated Argument

    Premises
    1) Before the Quran, atoms were considered (by the Greeks) to be the smallest unit of matter
    2) The Qur'an uses the word "dharra" (ذَرَّةٍ)
    3) "dharra" (ذَرَّةٍ)" means "atom" (as per the modern Atomic theory)
    4) The Qur'an mentions something smaller than atoms
    5) Sub-atomic particles are smaller than atoms

    Conclusion
    Therefore, Qur'an contained knowledge of sub-atomic particles (before anyone knew).

    Objections

    1. The meaning of "dharra" (ذَرَّةٍ) as "atom" is a modern definition
    2. The argument commits the fallacy of equivocation & the Fallacy of Undistributed Middle
    3. Anachronism: conflating modern Atomic theory with the Philosophy of Atomism
    4. The updated dawahganda argument is based on a false premise

    Conclusion

                The dawahganda argument claimed that the Qur’an foretold the existence of either “atoms” or “sub-atomic particles”. The argument, however, was based on a contrived anachronistic translation founded on the historical misconception about the philosophy of atomism which was conflated with the modern atomic theory. Thus this miracle claim is false and debunked.
  • Dawahganda: Atoms & Sub-atomic Particles in the Qur'an
     Reply #1 - February 08, 2014, 03:19 AM

     Cheesy

    `But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
     `Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: `we're all mad here. I'm mad.  You're mad.'
     `How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
     `You must be,' said the Cat, `or you wouldn't have come here.'
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »