Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
Today at 06:58 PM

New Britain
Yesterday at 06:14 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
January 06, 2025, 09:50 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 12:03 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 11:55 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
December 28, 2024, 01:33 PM

News From Syria
by zeca
December 28, 2024, 12:29 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
December 27, 2024, 12:20 PM

Mo Salah
December 26, 2024, 05:30 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
December 25, 2024, 10:58 AM

What's happened to the fo...
December 25, 2024, 02:29 AM

Berlin car crasher
by zeca
December 21, 2024, 11:10 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Miracle: Iron is sent down

 (Read 6341 times)
  • Previous page 1 2« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #30 - September 23, 2010, 09:28 PM

    If such a huge mass of meteorites containing iron could form in orbits intersecting Earth, the hypothesis that Iron would have remained closer to the Sun would be false to begin with.

    Iron is also found on Mars.
    And in the Asteroid belt. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_belt

    So the claim that Iron is too heavy and would have remained closer to the Sun than Earth's orbit... looks completely made up just to justify "Islamic miracles" lol :S


    I remember reading (non Islamic source) that heavier elements stayed in a close orbits whilst lighter elements drifted further away to make gas planets etc.  It's something I need to check up on.  I was giving it the benefit of the doubt before I looked into that part of it, I still need to investigate that bit further.  The quick debunk is "No, the Iron was always there" Smiley

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #31 - September 23, 2010, 10:01 PM

    Also stars on the lowest of heavens. (another verse)


    Yes, 41:12. But even that hasn't stopped Muslims trying to pull this particular apologetic.
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #32 - September 23, 2010, 10:38 PM

    I remember reading (non Islamic source) that heavier elements stayed in a close orbits whilst lighter elements drifted further away to make gas planets etc.  It's something I need to check up on.  I was giving it the benefit of the doubt before I looked into that part of it, I still need to investigate that bit further.  The quick debunk is "No, the Iron was always there" Smiley

    True, but "close orbits" means within the zone of the terrestrial planets.
    So, up to Mars included, and possibly in between Mars and Jupiter, or it could not explain the asteroid belt.

    Do not look directly at the operational end of the device.
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #33 - September 24, 2010, 06:12 AM

    Okay, I have finally looked.  The inner planets Mercury, Venus, Earth, and Mars are all dense planets and contain Iron.  Then there is the main asteroid belt, and much further out are the large gas planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune.

    So the non-Islamic info I heard a long time ago that heavy elements remained closer to the Sun was correct.

    The first 4 planets had Iron on them from the start.  Sure this iron came from impacts, but that's because in early times there was not really an Earth but a collection of elements smashing together to form larger masses.  

    Funnily enough I found someone asking if the iron on Earth was always there or if it had come from elsewhere, and someone had posted this miracle claim as an answer Cheesy  Their post had a slightly modified version, the Quran NOW proves that iron is made from stars rather than always existing on Earth.  Funny!

    So the quickest way to rebut this is
    Claim: Iron came to Earth via meteorites.
    Answer: No, iron is the most common element on Earth. It was there from the beginning of the Earth's formation.

    Claim: The Quran proves Iron came from stars.
    Answer: ALL elements except hydrogen and helium came from stars, so why mention Iron in particular?  It is because meteorites that arrived on Earth during human existence were collected for their iron, which is why Egyptians thousands of years before Muhammad named it "Ore of the heavens"

    These miracles are really impressive, until you spend 5 minutes with an Internet connection researching them.  How people living in a shanty town in Pakistan can fall for this rubbish is obvious, but someone with an Internet connection?  That's a miracle! Smiley

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #34 - September 24, 2010, 02:53 PM

     Afro

    Confucius:
    "What you do not like done to yourself, do not unto others."
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #35 - October 01, 2010, 09:43 AM

    The power of self delusion!  When looking at the miracle claims this guy put forward I presented him with historical and scientific facts to prove that they were not miracles.  In each case he conceded that they were not miracles after all, and if they are then at best they were "unconvincing" ones.  It's now been a couple of weeks since he wrote to me.  I had hoped that he had been thinking about stuff during this time and that I had given him the incentive to investigate all the other claims for himself.  Instead it appears that this time was spent allowing his mental logic virus to rewire his brain and pretend we didn't disprove the claims after all

    Quote from: MuslimOnYouTube
    Anyway, judging from our previous conversations, the only thing that will convince you is an irrefutable scientific/mathematical evidence within the Quran.

    Given that I've shown you a few scientific ones, I have realised these verses can be interpreted differently. The concept of translation and different meanings will always be a barrier to our final conclusions.


    I'm really not interested in trying to make the delusional see sense so I found this to be a very frustrating development.  Here is my rather stern reply.

    Quote from: Me
    Hi XXX

    I'm afraid you have really disappointed me...

    >Given that I've shown you a few scientific ones, I have realised these verses can be interpreted differently

    You presented me with claims of what you thought were miracles and I showed how they were previously known information (Iron sent down) or completely concocted (tips of fingers = finger prints are unique.)

    I was very happy to talk to someone with an open mind who was willing to accept that a person had deceived them, and in admitting it was then no longer deceived. But it seems like you are now deceiving yourself and saying "It's just a different interpretation" - my proofs where not based on interpretation.

    I am happy to discuss any amount of proof you think you have that the Quran is of divine origin, but I am certainly not in the business of de-converting the self-deluded. If you really want the truth then I am happy to talk with you about this stuff over a long period of time, if however you wish to believe in Islam even if it is false because that's what you want to be true no matter what then there's no point talking because I will present facts, you will concede the point, and then you will continue to believe that these things are miracles despite the clear facts to the contrary; and that is a waste of my time.

    Now I have not yet looked into the numerology claims in the Quran. I'm happy to look into it and tell you what I think, but not if your conclusion is foregone.

    So. Are you in a position where you still concede that none of the miracle claims you previously sent that I refuted have any merit, or since we last spoke have you decided that they are miracles after all? If the latter, then what evidence has changed your mind?

    I hope you can see my point. It would be like me conceding every one of your points and accepting them as miracles, and then a week later saying "I don't think they are miracles after all" without having any reason whatsoever to change my mind.


    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #36 - October 01, 2010, 09:09 PM

    Wohoo!  Great news.  I have no idea what he was actually talking about when he was talking about misunderstandings in Arabic translations but he replied and told me I had misunderstood him and he still accepts that those miracle claims are fabricated! I was particularly happy with this part...

    Quote
    I hope you understand my views a little bit better now. I AM open to different points of view. And I admit, many of the claims we have discussed you HAVE had the upper hand in terms of validity. I am now more critical about what I read. And for that I thank you.

    TheRationalizer weeps Smiley

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #37 - October 01, 2010, 09:27 PM

    That is a rarity - a muslim accepting he was wrong on an islamic miracle!  Relish it, as I doubt you will get that result again!

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #38 - October 01, 2010, 09:29 PM


    19:46   <zizo>: hugs could pimp u into sex

    Quote from: yeezevee
    well I am neither ex-Muslim nor absolute 100% Non-Muslim.. I am fucking Zebra

  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #39 - October 02, 2010, 10:06 AM

    Okay, just had my next "miracle".  This time it was a numerology claim.  I haven't bothered looking at these before because they are not based on meaningful steps, but I had a go anyway.

    Quote from: MuslimOnYoutube
    Arite so how about this one. I am sure you have read at some point, that there are random letters at the beginning of many suras in the Quran, correct? The letters "Alif, Laam, Meem", at the start of the 2nd chapter for instance has no meaning. At the time the Quran was being compiled, it was literally believed no one knew what these letters meant. It was considered a sorf of "Miracle" at the time. Now, you can definitely argue that Muhammad merely put random letters together, to make it SEEM like they were from God, but that claim can easily be shot down.

    Because if you look further, you will realise that these "random letters" at the beginning of SELECT suras, are there FOR a reason.

    If we look for the chapters which start with the letters, "Alif, Lam, Meem", we find there are 6 chapters in the Quran in total. Exactly 6 suras, have these specific random letters at the beginning of the individual chapter.

    The order of these 6 chapters is like this:

    1. Surat Al-Baqarah
    2. Surat Al-'Imran
    15. Surat Al'Ankabut
    16. Surat Al-Ruum
    17. Surat Luqmaan
    18. Surat Al-Sajdah

    My note: The indexes used here are explained in my response, so just accept them for now (TR)

    EACH of these suras, start with "Alif, Laam, Meem" for some reason.

    Arranging these numbers, we find:
    Al-Sajdah Luqmaan Al-Ruum Al-'Ankabut Al-'Imran Al-Baqarah
    18 17 16 15 2 1

    Put them together and you get, 1817161521. You with me so far?

    The number 1817161521 is a multiple of 7. Now, I know what you said previously about the number 7. How it is used in the Bible and was believed to be lucky etc etc. But let's look further into this example.

    The number 1817161521 is a multiple of 7.
    1817161521 = 259594503 x 7

    The quotient is also a multiple of 7.
    259594503 = 37084929 x 7

    The quotient of THAT number is yet another multiple of 7.
    37084929 = 5297847 x 7

    In other words, that number we got in the beginning (1817161521) is actually 5297847 x 7 x 7 x 7.

    If we take that quotient of the quotient number that we got (5297847), we get something REALLY interesting.

    5 + 2 + 9 + 7 + 8 + 4 + 7 = 42
    42 = 6 X 7

    Yes even that number is a multiple of 7. But what about the 6? Well as you may have guessed, this 6 also matches the exact number of verses in the entire Quran that has the random mysterious "Alif, Laam, Meem" letters.

    In other words, the chapters were

    Al-Sajdah Luqmaan Al-Ruum Al-'Ankabut Al-'Imran Al-Baqarah
    18 17 16 15 2 1

    Right?

    SO

    1817161521
    1817161521 = 259594503 x 7
    259594503 = 37084929 x 7
    37084929 = 5297847 x 7

    5297847
    5 + 2 + 9 + 7 + 8 + 4 + 7 = 42
    42= 6 X 7

    6 = The number of Suras that we started with, taken from the total of 1817161521 in the beginning.

    7 is the common Miracle number here right? But what are the chances of us getting the number 6? This 6 is definitely a CONNECTION to the number of times the words "Alif, Laam, Meem" occur in the Quran.

    NOW given all this information, in order to get the best reply out of you, I'm trying to think of what you might say to this claim.

    Possible objection #1
    This is all a coincidence? That the number 7 is a common multiplier, and the chances of this happening are actually quite high. Also, I divided the number 1817161521 only 3 times. After that I stop getting multiples of 7, so why stop there. Why is it only 1817161521/7/7/7?Huh?? Perhaps Muhammad, or whoever made this miracle claim stopped at only 3 intervals to formulate this equation? Even SO, getting the 6 as well as the 7 as a multiplier at the end is QUITE hard to do. Especially 1400 years ago dont you think?

    Possible objection # 2
    Muhammad (Pbuh) ARRANGED the chapters in this way? Meaning, the Quran was revealed, but the CHAPTER NUMBERS were kept under control. So maybe, when the Quran was being put together in a period of 23 years, this random mysterious letter concept was kept in mind? I highly doubt that.

    Possible objection # 3
    This is insignificant? I put together a bunch of numbers, and divided a certain times, and then was able to get quotients to match, each being multiples of 7. And then coincidentally the 6 that I got, just happened to match to the NUMBER OF TIMES those letters (Alif, Laam, Meem) are mentioned in the Quran. Meaning, these random math equations have been put together to PROVE a miracle. Well I just have one thing to say to that my friend and I think you may recognize it:

    How did Muhammad pull this off?


    And here is my reply

    Quote from:
    Hiya

    Just woke up and I am taking a look at your miracle claim.  If you mention chapter names in future you could also write their numbers to save me some time Smiley

    The first thing I checked was that there are indeed only 6 suras that start this way, to do this I used QuranSearch.com - there are a couple with a 4th letter but only 6 that start with alif-lam-meem.

    >>
    1. Surat Al-Baqarah
    2. Surat Al-'Imran
    15. Surat Al'Ankabut
    16. Surat Al-Ruum
    17. Surat Luqmaan
    18. Surat Al-Sajdah
    <<

    The first thing I need to do is to make sense of the numbers.  You say that the numbers are "the order of these chapters"  If they are chapter numbers in the Quran then this is what I find…

    02: Al Baqarah
    03: Al Imran
    29: Al Ankabuwt
    30: Al Ruwm
    31: Al Luqmaan
    32: As Sadjah

    So by "order of" I then assume you mean "order in which they were originally spoken", so I looked here:

    http://www.missionislam.com/quran/revealationorder.htm

    And those numbers definitely don't match that order.

    So I googled "1817161521" and found that these numbers are the index of chapters that start with unknown letters, starting with 1.  You didn't make that part of your claim clear.


    POINT 1
    I assume you are aware that the order of the chapters in the Quran as you read it was determined by Caliph Uthman? 

    He could have chosen to put them in chronological order, smallest to largest, or largest to smallest.  He chose to put them largest to smallest BUT with the first "revelation" at the start.  So the order of these verses was entirely man made and nothing to do with Muhammad.  This fact alone answers your "How did Muhammad pull this off?" question…..he didn't.

    Of course if this order hadn't worked the claimant would have tried excluding the first chapter and putting it in its position relative to size.  Then they'd have tried reverse size order.  Then they'd have tried revelation order.

    So, the first thing that rings alarm bells for me is that the numbers here are man made.  They are man made because they are not in the Quran, and they are not even in the order that they were spoken.  They are in a man made order (Uthman) with other verses excluded.  There's a lot of "man made" going on here for a miracle from god.



    POINT 2
    All of the verses started with letters are used to determine this index but then are excluded.  They are either part of the miracle or they are not.  Essentially what this miracle is saying is "If we ignore 80% of these chapters (that start with unknown letters)……."

    When you discount 80% of the data that is called data bias.



    POINT 3
    The next big alarm bell for me was "When we arrange these numbers".  Arrange them?  They are already arranged!  Either the order longest->shortest is the miracle or it is not.  These numbers have been reversed for one reason only, to make the maths work.  It wouldn't have been hard for a human to sit down and rearrange these chapters so that this miracle didn't need to have the indexes reversed, with that in mind it obviously wouldn't have been hard for god either.  This is what is known as "a fudge" (i.e. a fiddle).


    POINT 4
    1817161521 / 7 = 259594503
    259594503 / 7 = 37084929
    37084929 / 7 = 5297847
    5297847 / 7 = An irrational number : 756835.2857……..

    So now the "miracle" switches from "this number is divisible by 7" over to "let's add up the digits".  I am surprised the miracle claimant didn't also say "Look, it's a 7 digit number!"

    So where is the consistency?  The pattern is "multiples of 7", for it to be a TRUE it should apply to ALL of it (in nature you allow small errors due to random mutation.)  So far it has been divided by 7^4 and then it becomes an irrational number.  If this hadn't happened how many MORE times would we have had to divide it by 7 to get down to a single digit number?

    5297847 / 7^7 = Irrational number: 6.4329937……..

    So in total you'd need to divide by 7 eleven times.  THAT would be statistically improbable.  But only 36% of these "divide by 7" steps can be performed before the pattern fails.  36% is not a pattern.



    POINT 5
    Adding up 5 digits and then dividing them by 7 gives a lot of hits.  I just wrote a quick C# program to test it not knowing what I would find.  Here it is if you are familiar with programming

          static void Main(string[] args)
          {
             int matches = 0;

             //Go through all 7 digit numbers
             for (int i = 1000000; i < 10000000; i++)
             {
                if (i % 1000 == 0)
                   Console.WriteLine("Processing: " + i.ToString());

                //Get the individual digits in that number
                int sumOfDigits = 0;
                string numberAsString = i.ToString();
                for (int charIndex = 0; charIndex < numberAsString.Length; charIndex++)
                {
                   int currentDigit = int.Parse(numberAsString.Substring(charIndex, 1));
                   sumOfDigits += currentDigit;
                }
                //See if it is exactly divisible by 6
                //If they are the same then output them
                if (sumOfDigits % 6 == 0)
                   matches++;
             }
             Console.WriteLine("{0} matches", matches);
             Console.ReadLine();
          }

    Output
    1500009 matches
    That's 15% of the numbers with 5 digits that have a sum of their digits which divide by 6. 

    I also tried this with numbers that divide by 7.  I think we both know that 7 was tried first and when it failed they tried 6.
    Output:
    1285774 matches
    That's 12% of the numbers with 5 digits that have a sum of their digits which divide by 7.

    So taking into account that you are I are not stupid and we know they would have tried the 2nd divisor if the first hadn't worked that means there is a 27% chance of those 5 digits adding together to be divisible by either 6 or 7.  That's higher than a 1 in 4 chance.

    Not very miraculous, is it?




    >I kid you not, there are over a 100 of examples JUST like these within the Quran.
    Sure, and they are all numerology tricks.  It's called numerology because they don't use a consistent approach within a single claim.  Numerology is a discredited scientific approach which is why I have never bothered looking at a single Quran numerology "miracle" claim.  In fact I think one scientist accusing another's paper as "numerology" would be seen as a derogatory term used to mock the lack of professionalism.



    SUMMARY:

    01: The verse orders in the Quran were decided by a Caliph.
    02: The order is descending in size, with a personal choice to make an exception and put the first revealed verse at the front.
    03: 80% of the chapters with "special letters" are ignored.
    04: 95% of the chapters in the entire Quran are ignored.
    05: The already artificial ordering is further distorted by reversing it, even though the number 1817161521 depends on the chapters being in the original order.
    06: There wasn't a single mathematical technique involved.  The claimant started to divide by the magic number 7 for a while, but after only 4 divisions hit an irrational number.
    07: The other 7 division operations required to get a single digit number are then abandoned.  That's 74% of the approach that failed there.
    08: The claimant then switched to "adding up the digits", but doesn't explain the MEANING of the result.  A meaningless result is a big giveaway that you are looking at a numerology trick.
    09:  15% of these 9,999,999 numbers are divisible by 6, and 12% are divisible by 7 (the other "important" number in this claim"), giving a 1 in 4 chance that we'd get a /6 or /7 hit.

    It's a little bit like that game people play where within 6 social connections you are connected to someone famous.
    Me->My friend->His cousin->His friend->Her aunt->Her friend->Brad Pitt.

    But in numerology you try a specific trick (counting occurrences that start with ALM), then you try dividing them by some number for a while, when you hit a brick wall there you switch to adding up the digits and dividing, and so on.  There are so many meaningless steps they can introduce that in many cases you can find similar numbers all over the place.

    The Quran has a lot of these because mathematicians like to find them, and their religious devotion probably encourages them to spend lots of time looking for them.  There will be more in time too.  None of them have any credibility though, I hope you can now see the numerous tactics used in the trickery of this claim?

    What you need is
    1: Consistency
    2: Indiscrimination of data
    3: MEANING - If there is no meaning to the numbers in each step then it then it is……..well, meaningless.


    I wonder what he will make of this one Smiley

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #40 - October 02, 2010, 07:57 PM

    look up numerology in the search field - we've already debunked this one pretty well

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #41 - October 02, 2010, 08:43 PM

    I think it is pretty funny that an all powerful being who created the universe has to prove the truth of a book by hiding numbers in the text like easter eggs.  Seems pretty weak to me.

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #42 - October 02, 2010, 08:48 PM

    This old video by philhellenes on this exact miracle claim should be helpful

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKy122yIKik

    Pakistan Zindabad? ya Pakistan sey Zinda bhaag?

    Long Live Pakistan? Or run with your lives from Pakistan?
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #43 - October 02, 2010, 09:35 PM

    We've moved on from Iron now.  He accepted it is not a miracle.

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Miracle: Iron is sent down
     Reply #44 - October 05, 2010, 09:30 AM

    Quote from: MuslimOnYoutube
    Sorry again for the lateness of my reply. I really should be more like you, with your prompt replies.

    Anyway, I read your answer to my mathematical claim. There are a few things that stood out to me. Though what you said had actually crossed my mind in the past. I was unsure who it was that assembled or put together the actual chapters within the Quran.

    From what I know, it was either Uthaman or Ali depending on the hadith you look at. Although one thing is certain, the Prophet Muhammad didn't organize these chapters. That being said, it takes away completely from anything I would want to say about these claims. I guess a weaker claim I could use, is that God told Uthman or Ali, to arrange the chapters in such and such way. Although, as a Muslim I don't believe anyone spoke to God, other than Allah or Gabriel.

    So, that being said any mathematical claims that relate to the chapter numbers, I will no longer consider. HOWEVER, I will double check and let you know about who actually organized the chapters and how. (I really should know this, I'm surprised I dont)


    Though on a side note, I understand what you mean when it comes to consistency in these claims. I will try and keep that in mind.

    I wanted to mention though, even with these conversations that we have been having, it has opened my mind alot more. And thankfully I have been exposed to the "fake" miracle claims that have been put out there by other Muslims. Though I thought I should let you know, none of this shakes my belief in the fact that God actually did speak to Prophet Muhammad.

    What makes a Muslims belief so concrete is not just merely these whacky science/math claims. There are many things, such as the life of prophet Muhammad which give a high level of confidence in one's beliefs. I suggest, if you do get some time, look into the kind of man he was. It will have broaden your insights on Islam. One starts to ask the question, of where did he get his words? How did he know how to say this or that?

    (yes even if they weren't proven Miracles today, there was a mysterious consistency in his claims/revelations, and at the same time, he was also poor. He lived in a tiny house, and was never concerned about power or money. In fact whats more interesting, Jesus is mentioned more times in the Quran than Muhammad. It makes you wonder, why would a man just make up a religion, to be treated the way he was?)

    So just putting that out there. Anyway I had a claim that I have come across, I was hoping if you could take a look at it, and get back to me. Its not a mathematical claim, more of a historical one.

    Chapter 28, Verse 38

    Fir'aun (Pharaoh) said: "O chiefs! I know not that you have an ilâh (a god) other than me, so kindle for me (a fire), O Hâmân, to bake (bricks out of) clay, and set up for me a Sarh (a lofty tower, or palace) in order that I may look at (or look for) the Ilâh (God) of Mûsa (Moses); and verily, I think that he [Mûsa (Moses)] is one of the liars." (38)


    The name "Haman" is mentioned here. In the Quran 600 years after Christ, and many many many years after the Pharoah's time. I'm not sure what your beliefs are regarding the ancient egyptians and so on, but obviously there are Pyramids up there for all of us to see. So, there was a time when they were being built, and there was a time when ancient Hieroglyphics were being used right?

    SO, that being said, there is a claimed discovery that I wanted to point out.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_x5C5fLg9-M


    I dont usually let the links do all the work, but this is 3 mins long and explains the concept pretty well!

    Look forward to the reply, as always.


    And my reply:

    Quote from: Me
    > I have been exposed to the "fake" miracle claims that have been put out there by other Muslims. Though I thought I should let you know, none of this shakes my belief in the fact that God actually did speak to Prophet Muhammad.

    Well if you choose to base a belief on a complete lack of evidence that is up to you, I cannot help the deluded, I am not a shrink Smiley

    But I am happy to discuss these so called "miracle" claims because they are an attempt to be factual evidence, therefore they can be assessed objectively.


    >Jesus is mentioned more times in the Quran than Muhammad

    That's because it's a dialogue on history.


    >The name "Haman" is mentioned here. In the Quran 600 years after Christ, and many many many years after the Pharoah's time.

    1: It is very common for information to be known and then at some point lost only to be rediscovered later.  Take Eratosthenes for example, before he died in 195BCE he not only knew the Earth was spherical but also very accurately estimated its circumference.  Yet for centuries people still believed the Earth was flat until this fact was rediscovered.

    This information could have been known and then forgotten over time.  History works that way, the more recent it was the more people know about it.  So to ask how someone in the past could possibly have known about something in the past is illogical, it's more impressive that we know about it now.


    2: How do we know that "Haman" was not as common back then as "Abdul" is today?


    3: The following verses also mention Haman 29:39, 40:24 but they also mention someone called Qarun.  Qarun's name was not on this discovered artefact was it? So if the presence of Haman proves a revelation from god does the absence of Qarun prove it wasn't?  It seems to me that if god wanted to use this as a sign then it would have been perfect, not only 50% accurate.  That's selective data analysis!



    4: But of course you did type "Haman" into google, didn't you?  That's a rhetorical question, because I suspect you didn't Smiley  Haman is a character in the old testament.  He was an advisor to the King of Persia.  It's not hard to confuse "Haman, advisor to the king" and think that "the king" is the pharaoh.  This is easily explained as Muhammad's misunderstanding of stories in the Torah.

    There's lots of information about the name "Haman" on this page
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haman_(Bible)

    Generally it's a name considered with a person who is very evil and wants to kill all the Jews.  He was like the arch enemy of the Jews, and therefore the name "Haman" was a well known name associated with evil.


    Tell you what.  How about for the next miracle claim you think up a miracle that really impresses you, and then try to debunk it yourself?  Put to use these new logic skills you've learned and see if you can use them to stop fraudsters pulling the wool over your eyes?  I think it will be far more interesting for you to present me with a miracle and then explain how you debunked it yourself.

    What do you think? Smiley



    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Previous page 1 2« Previous thread | Next thread »