Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Today at 02:52 PM

Gaza assault
Yesterday at 11:31 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
January 12, 2025, 09:05 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
January 11, 2025, 02:52 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
January 09, 2025, 09:33 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
January 09, 2025, 01:34 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 12:03 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 11:55 AM

News From Syria
by zeca
December 28, 2024, 12:29 AM

Mo Salah
December 26, 2024, 05:30 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
December 25, 2024, 10:58 AM

What's happened to the fo...
December 25, 2024, 02:29 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"

 (Read 314151 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 14 15 1617 18 ... 61 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #450 - May 26, 2010, 09:52 PM

    really  Huh?

    Let's see again:

    Quote
    Hmmm.. in any case, how do you know if this verse was not a commandment for then, so Muslims would walk a straight & narrow path and be victorious against the infidels?


    well, sounds to me like God, while knowing Alcohol is not really that bad, He still told them it was bad anyway, because he needed them to stay sobre.

    The language of the verse is very clear, it slammed the door on Alcohol for good.

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #451 - May 26, 2010, 09:55 PM

    As for Hell (or at least eternity in Hell), it was promised only to the proud/arrogant...


    I find this interesting.

    In 59:23, Allah refers to himself as 'al-Mutakabbar,' which can mean 'the proud,' 'the arrogant,' 'the lofty,' etc. And in 39:72, Allah says that Hell is the 'abode of al-mutakabbareena,' i.e.,. 'the abode of the arrogant/proud/lofty.'

    Isn't it rather odd that Allah sends people to hell for possessing a characteristic that he himself possesses? Smacks of hypocrisy, it seems.

    There's also a Qudsi hadith with a similar theme (This one's not from Bukhari  grin12):

    Hadith Qudsi 19:
    On the authority of Abu Hurayrah (may Allah be pleased with him), who said that the Messenger of Allah (peace be upon him) said: Allah (mighty and sublime be He) said:

    Pride is my cloak and greatness My robe, and he who competes with Me in respect of either of them I shall cast into Hell-fire.

    It was related by Abu Dawud (also by Ibn Majah and Ahmad) with sound chains of authority. This Hadith also appears in Muslim in another version.
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #452 - May 26, 2010, 09:59 PM

    really  Huh?

    Let's see again:

    well, sounds to me like God, while knowing Alcohol is not really that bad, He still told them it was bad anyway, because he needed them to stay sobre.


    how do you know if this verse about intoxicants is not just a commandment for then, to ensure muslims stayed level-headed & focused against the forces against them?

    Or do you agree its ambiguous?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #453 - May 26, 2010, 10:43 PM

    @ Zebedee (what does your nick mean, anyway? Smiley

    I have no problem with either the verse or the Hadith...

    I find it always fascinating when we project our common understanding of the word: "pride", on God's pride. Pride is bad in our sight because, proud people, no matter how successful, rich, powerful, or beautiful, etc are still people like us... and in the eyes of God their pride is detestable because it was God who gave them all of these gifts... man (or any creation of God) has no right to feel proud whatsoever.

    I don't know if you came across these verses, but in the following verses, a rich man who was too proud and arrogant because of all the gifts God gave him, was considered *Mushrik* because by being so proud as to expect God would give him special treatment because of his wealth, he effectively *deified* himself:

    18:32-18:44
    http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/018.qmt.html

    I'll only highlight a small part of these verses:

    18:35
    And he entered his garden while he was unjust to himself. He said: I do not think that this will ever perish 
    18:36
     And I do not think the hour will come, and even if I am returned to my Lord I will most certainly find a returning place better than this.
    18:37
     His companion said to him while disputing with him: Do you disbelieve in Him Who created you from dust, then from a small seed, then He made you a perfect man?
    18:38
    But as for me, He, Allah, is my Lord, and I do not associate anyone with my Lord.


    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #454 - May 26, 2010, 10:55 PM

    how do you know if this verse about intoxicants is not just a commandment for then, to ensure muslims stayed level-headed & focused against the forces against them?

    Or do you agree its ambiguous?


    Islame, intoxicants were lumped togeather with idols as filth and the work of Satan... if that's not clear enough on how the Quran closed the door for good on Alcohol, then I don't think anything else will do.

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #455 - May 26, 2010, 11:11 PM

    The idol thing could be a time related thing too.  I dont suppose you believe you should go on a visit to the India and go round smashing their idols too.  In any case intoxicants could be talking about drugs, or just not to drink anything in intoxication. 

    Like a few other similar verses, wine is not forbidden in each of them, and this is where you would have expected him to put them.

    Quote
    005.003  Forbidden unto you (for food) are carrion and blood and swineflesh, and that which hath been dedicated unto any other than Allah, and the strangled, and the dead through beating, and the dead through falling from a height, and that which hath been killed by (the goring of) horns, and the devoured of wild beasts, saving that which ye make lawful (by the death-stroke), and that which hath been immolated unto idols. And (forbidden is it) that ye swear by the divining arrows. This is an abomination.

     

    Why are they pressing wine?
    Quote
    012.049 Then, after that, will come a year when the people will have plenteous crops and when they will press (wine and oil).


    Why is the Lord drinking wine here if its so bad? Why in other verses is it offered plentifully in heaven (unlike pork & carrion)?
    Quote
    012.041 O my two fellow-prisoners! As for one of you, he will pour out wine for his lord to drink; and as for the other, he will be crucified so that the birds will eat from his head. Thus is the case judged concerning which ye did inquire.



    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #456 - May 26, 2010, 11:14 PM

    these verses are talking abut the Egyptians, you know that.

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #457 - May 26, 2010, 11:22 PM

    @ Zebedee (what does your nick mean, anyway? Smiley

    I have no problem with either the verse or the Hadith...

    I find it always fascinating when we project our common understanding of the word: "pride", on God's pride. Pride is bad in our sight because, proud people, no matter how successful, rich, powerful, or beautiful, etc are still people like us... and in the eyes of God their pride is detestable because it was God who gave them all of these gifts... man (or any creation of God) has no right to feel proud whatsoever.

    I don't know if you came across these verses, but in the following verses, a rich man who was too proud and arrogant because of all the gifts God gave him, was considered *Mushrik* because by being so proud as to expect God would give him special treatment because of his wealth, he effectively *deified* himself:

    18:32-18:44
    http://www.usc.edu/schools/college/crcc/engagement/resources/texts/muslim/quran/018.qmt.html

    I'll only highlight a small part of these verses:

    18:35
    And he entered his garden while he was unjust to himself. He said: I do not think that this will ever perish  
    18:36
     And I do not think the hour will come, and even if I am returned to my Lord I will most certainly find a returning place better than this.
    18:37
     His companion said to him while disputing with him: Do you disbelieve in Him Who created you from dust, then from a small seed, then He made you a perfect man?
    18:38
    But as for me, He, Allah, is my Lord, and I do not associate anyone with my Lord.




    Why, good debunker, it means 'gift of God' in some obscure Middle-Eastern language. But I simply got the name from the character on the Magic Roundabout, and I chose it because I thought it sounded funny.

    As for what you said about God being proud; I think it's very interesting to hear that kind of reasoning from the religious and then to see how completely unaware they are of where their reasoning necessarily takes them.

    That is, you claim that humans have nothing, and have earned nothing, and only have what they have because it has been given to them.

    Which is funny because I don't recall Allah ever mentioning that he ever earned his omnipotence or omniscience. I don't think he ever had to undergo trials, pain, and suffering in order to get where he is. No, he simply has all his power, perfect freedom and invincibility without having to lift a metaphorical finger to attain any of it. A fluke of metaphysics has given this god of yours everything; he has earned nothing.

    Yet, this same being pontificates to humans, with a truly amusing irony, about how evil and vicious and proud we are.

    Well, in any case, there is no question in my mind, that a weak and limited human, who goes through and endures pain, suffering, fear, and so much else, is infinitely more praise-worthy than a being that never even knew what it is like to fear.

    Really. Is someone who works, strives, suffers and who expends their finite energy and improves themselves equal to one who sits on his ass all day and who has never been exposed to any hardship or danger?

    Allah should add another one to the list; al-Munaafiq.

    [3:188]
    Do not think of those who are delighted with what they did, and love to be praised for what they never did - do not think they are secure from the punishment. For them there is a painful punishment.
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #458 - May 26, 2010, 11:23 PM

    these verses are talking abut the Egyptians, you know that.

    No i didnt, but please tackle the whole post, rather than just one element of it.  

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #459 - May 27, 2010, 12:13 AM

    @ Zebeedee

    Quote
    That is, you claim that humans have nothing, and have earned nothing, and only have what they have because it has been given to them.


    In the *absolute* sense, yes (why, we don't even own a single atom in our bodies).

    Quote
    Which is funny because I don't recall Allah ever mentioning that he ever earned his omnipotence or omniscience. I don't think he ever had to undergo trials, pain, and suffering in order to get where he is. No, he simply has all his power, perfect freedom and invincibility without having to lift a metaphorical finger to attain any of it. A fluke of metaphysics has given this god of yours everything; he has earned nothing.


    ?? He has earned nothing? He is EVERYTHING! Let me get this straight... are you saying that God has no right to think He's higher than ANY and ALL of His creation? Yes/No?

    Quote
    Well, in any case, there is no question in my mind, that a weak and limited human, who goes through and endures pain, suffering, fear, and so much else, is infinitely more praise-worthy than a being that never even knew what it is like to fear.


    Why are you mixing things up? What does God, being beyond pain or suffering, has anything to do with His infinite majesty? Are you really that arrogant Zebeedee? Do you realy think that God owes you or anyone, anything?

    Quote
    Really. Is someone who works, strives, suffers and who expends their finite energy and improves themselves equal to one who sits on his ass all day and who has never been exposed to any hardship or danger?


    Oh, OK... you ARE too arrogant (towards God)... not only are you arrogant enough to compare yourself to Him (why should He think He's infinitly Greater than anyone else -- allow Himself to be proud-- while us humans aren't allowed to be proud) you go ahead an claim that you are actually much greater than Him. Very interesting! Smiley

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #460 - May 27, 2010, 12:22 AM

    The idol thing could be a time related thing too.  I dont suppose you believe you should go on a visit to the India and go round smashing their idols too.  In any case intoxicants could be talking about drugs, or just not to drink anything in intoxication. 

    Like a few other similar verses, wine is not forbidden in each of them, and this is where you would have expected him to put them.
     

    Why are they pressing wine?
    Why is the Lord drinking wine here if its so bad? Why in other verses is it offered plentifully in heaven (unlike pork & carrion)?



    Ok, since you're speaking from the perspective of someone who believes in the Quran, then let's do this:

    1- NO... we cannot smash the idols of others... the Islamic claim is that the Kaaba/Mecca, was God's Temple, with time, polytheists filled it with their idols... in this sense, the Kaaba was hijacked by polytheism, so destroying these idols are is not a crime... The same cannot be said regarding India, etc... Of course we have no right to destroy their idols. 

    2- That verse was the last verse revealed regarding wine.
    http://www.missionislam.com/quran/revealationorder.htm

    3- The Egyptian king (lord) drank wine, so what?

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #461 - May 27, 2010, 08:05 AM

    and these?

    Quote from: Islame
    In any case intoxicants could be talking about not to drink anything in intoxication.

     

    Quote from: Islame
    Like a few other similar verses, wine is not forbidden in each of them, and this is where you would have expected him to put them.


    The only reason I am repeating this is that after reading the Quran recently, I truly gained the impression that Muhammed initially didnt ban alcohol, or he didnt mind drinking as long as it wasnt too intoxication. 
    And the Quran was written this way. 

    It was only post-medina when muslims turned up to prayers pissed he decided to ban it.  And the hadith concur with this I think.

    This for me again brings up questions of reliability of Muhammed again who was supposedly getting messages from an omnicient being, who would have known all the problems beforehand and not etched pro-wine verses into the Quran.

    But also makes me wonder is how hadith-only's know that alcohol is haram?  As without the hadith, they dont even know the order of the verses and for all they know, the wine verses could have been revealed the other way around?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #462 - May 27, 2010, 08:37 AM

    According to some muslims alcohol is not haram as long as you don't over do it.
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #463 - May 27, 2010, 11:48 AM

    @ Zebeedee

    In the *absolute* sense, yes (why, we don't even own a single atom in our bodies).

    ?? He has earned nothing? He is EVERYTHING! Let me get this straight... are you saying that God has no right to think He's higher than ANY and ALL of His creation? Yes/No?

    Why are you mixing things up? What does God, being beyond pain or suffering, has anything to do with His infinite majesty? Are you really that arrogant Zebeedee? Do you realy think that God owes you or anyone, anything?

    Oh, OK... you ARE too arrogant (towards God)... not only are you arrogant enough to compare yourself to Him (why should He think He's infinitly Greater than anyone else -- allow Himself to be proud-- while us humans aren't allowed to be proud) you go ahead an claim that you are actually much greater than Him. Very interesting! Smiley


    And why don't we own an atom in our bodies? Because we didn't create/make/earn it. And similarly, your god didn't create/make/earn his own   power, so has no more rightful ownership of it, than we have of the atoms that comprise our bodies.

    Allah only has what has been given to him by a fluke of metaphysics, but we at least have what we have earned through our own effort. When this god of yours wants something all he'd have to do is wish it into being. Things aren't so easy for us.

    And like I said, yes. Your god has earned nothing. And you may say that your god has a right to think that he's better than the creations in the sense that he has what they do not. Just as someone who has inherited vast wealth and power may believe themselves to be in a better position than a pauper. But the fact still he remains that he has earned and deserved nothing.

    And your god's 'infinite majesty'? Your god's 'infinite majesty' is the product of a fluke of metaphysics. He has no more rightful claim to it than anyone else, and if he existed, he would surely know that. You'd think it would be enough to humble him, to make him be thankful for just how lucky he is. Yet, he seems to prefer to gloat in his profound arrogance about what he has not earned an iota of.

    And my arrogance or lack thereof has nothing to do with it.  I'm simply stating things as they are, and I don't expect anything from your god.

    Nor did I specifically say that I am better than your god. You see, I too have been quite lucky. Not the luckiest person, but very, very far from unlucky. I simply have the tiny bit of humility that's necessary to see that. Unlike, it seems, your god.

    And of course, denying humans the right to be proud is a complete double standard on your god's part. It's also rather amusing that he condemns those who seek to be praised for what they have not done, as if he somehow earned or wrought into existence what he has. It's a clear double standard, and your pointing the finger at me and calling me arrogant doesn't change a thing.

    But to clarify, let's look at the example again.

    If there's a person who simply inherits vast wealth and power as a birth right, is that person in any way then praise worthy for all that they have? Just because they have it?

    Fair enough if someone worked their way up from the bottom and actually earned vast wealth and influence. Of course that would be a praise-worthy accomplishment. But someone who simply is given everything because of what family they were born into, when it could have just as easily been anyone else?

    Do you think people would regard such a person as being praise-worthy? Someone who has simply been given everything through no effort of their own? And what if that person then demanded the praise of others for all of that? Do you think then that they'd see that person as being worthy of praise?

    Sure, he has a lot more than a pauper on the street. But how much more has he actually earned? Nothing. He never earned, nor does he deserve any thing that he has, as it has all simply been given to him. He only possesses what he has by accident, and for no other reason.

    My arrogance has nothing to do with it. That's just the way it is, whether one likes it or not.
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #464 - May 28, 2010, 05:36 AM

    @ zebedee

    Quote
    And why don't we own an atom in our bodies? Because we didn't create/make/earn it. And similarly, your god didn't create/make/earn his own   power, so has no more rightful ownership of it, than we have of the atoms that comprise our bodies.


    lol... ok, I won't even try to respond to the bolded part, how about this: no one gave anything to God, while we have been given everything by God? Until you identify the entity who gave God His existence, power, etc, you have no argument, and in case such an enitity exists, then that's my God.

    Quote
    Allah only has what has been given to him by a fluke of metaphysics, but we at least have what we have earned through our own effort. When this god of yours wants something all he'd have to do is wish it into being. Things aren't so easy for us.


    Oh, so now you're saying God existed thanks to metaphysics? But in this case, at least as far as I'm concerned, you're making God a creation, and thus He cannot be God.

    And things aren't easy for us? What I believe is that even the easiest things for us, like every breath we take, are granted by God.

    Quote
    And like I said, yes. Your god has earned nothing. And you may say that your god has a right to think that he's better than the creations in the sense that he has what they do not. Just as someone who has inherited vast wealth and power may believe themselves to be in a better position than a pauper. But the fact still he remains that he has earned and deserved nothing.

    And your god's 'infinite majesty'? Your god's 'infinite majesty' is the product of a fluke of metaphysics. He has no more rightful claim to it than anyone else, and if he existed, he would surely know that. You'd think it would be enough to humble him, to make him be thankful for just how lucky he is. Yet, he seems to prefer to gloat in his profound arrogance about what he has not earned an iota of.

    And my arrogance or lack thereof has nothing to do with it.  I'm simply stating things as they are, and I don't expect anything from your god.

    Nor did I specifically say that I am better than your god. You see, I too have been quite lucky. Not the luckiest person, but very, very far from unlucky. I simply have the tiny bit of humility that's necessary to see that. Unlike, it seems, your god.

    And of course, denying humans the right to be proud is a complete double standard on your god's part. It's also rather amusing that he condemns those who seek to be praised for what they have not done, as if he somehow earned or wrought into existence what he has. It's a clear double standard, and your pointing the finger at me and calling me arrogant doesn't change a thing.

     

    See above, again, clearly you have a different definition for God.. To me, a created God is an oxymoron. A God who is given anything is NOT God, but only a tyrant, no matter how great he is.

    Quote
    But to clarify, let's look at the example again.

    If there's a person who simply inherits vast wealth and power as a birth right, is that person in any way then praise worthy for all that they have? Just because they have it?


    No. I thought I already made that clear... in fact, even intelligent people have no right to feel proud, because even their intelligence is given to them by God.

    Quote
    Fair enough if someone worked their way up from the bottom and actually earned vast wealth and influence. Of course that would be a praise-worthy accomplishment.

     

    yeah, you can praise them, but they still have no right to be proud.

    Quote
    But someone who simply is given everything because of what family they were born into, when it could have just as easily been anyone else?


    Such a person should not be praised, but then again, like the other person, they have no right to be proud.

    Quote
    Do you think people would regard such a person as being praise-worthy? Someone who has simply been given everything through no effort of their own? And what if that person then demanded the praise of others for all of that? Do you think then that they'd see that person as being worthy of praise?


    No.

    Quote
    Sure, he has a lot more than a pauper on the street. But how much more has he actually earned? Nothing. He never earned, nor does he deserve any thing that he has, as it has all simply been given to him. He only possesses what he has by accident, and for no other reason.


    True, but even the other person, who *earned* what they got, they earned it ultimately because God willed it, in other words, God gave it to them.

    Quote
    My arrogance has nothing to do with it. That's just the way it is, whether one likes it or not.


    All you did is making God a creation, like us, and thus even He has no right to view Himself as higher than anything else, which is true, except, like I said before, a created God is no God.

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #465 - May 28, 2010, 05:43 AM

    and these?
     

    The only reason I am repeating this is that after reading the Quran recently, I truly gained the impression that Muhammed initially didnt ban alcohol, or he didnt mind drinking as long as it wasnt too intoxication.  
    And the Quran was written this way.  

    It was only post-medina when muslims turned up to prayers pissed he decided to ban it.  And the hadith concur with this I think.

    This for me again brings up questions of reliability of Muhammed again who was supposedly getting messages from an omnicient being, who would have known all the problems beforehand and not etched pro-wine verses into the Quran.

    But also makes me wonder is how hadith-only's know that alcohol is haram?  As without the hadith, they dont even know the order of the verses and for all they know, the wine verses could have been revealed the other way around?


    The ban on alcohol, as the order of the verses suggest, was gradual... you can't tell someone to change their drinking habits overnight. and there are NO pro-wine verses, at best there are verses that are indifferent regarding alcohol.

    And I'm not a Quran only Muslim.

    Quote
    In any case intoxicants could be talking about not to drink anything in intoxication.

     

    The word in Quran is KHAMR... and KHAMR means wine...

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #466 - May 28, 2010, 10:02 AM

    you can't tell someone to change their drinking habits overnight. and there are NO pro-wine verses, at best there are verses that are indifferent regarding alcohol.

    I am not sure whether I would call this verse at best indifferent, dont you think this  quranic verse means at best that alcohol is nourishing and good for you?
    Quote
    016.067 And of the fruits of the date-palm, and grapes, whence ye derive strong drink
    and (also) good nourishment. Lo! therein is indeed a portent for people who have
    sense.


    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #467 - May 28, 2010, 01:41 PM

    Yup Islame, it does Afro

    ...
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #468 - May 28, 2010, 01:44 PM

    I don't think the good nourishment is related to the drinks though, but to the fruits of the date-palm, and grapes. Since it breaks up the sentence with AND (also).
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #469 - May 28, 2010, 01:53 PM

    The ban on alcohol, as the order of the verses suggest, was gradual... you can't tell someone to change their drinking habits overnight.


    I had the same conversation with the Muslim guy up the road about keeping slaves and fucking children.  Muhammad fucked a 9 year old girl to show that you should not fuck little children, but obviously people wouldn't like not being able to fuck any children at all so Muhammad knew that once he had increased the age limit to 9 we would over time continue to increase it to a more suitable age, you cannot expect people to change over night.

    My reply went something like this:
    Putting aside the fact that this is bollocks because there are places in the world where under Islamic culture people are still marrying (and presumably fucking) 9 year old girls, why could we not expect them to give things up immediately?  These people used to have god idols made of wood/stone, they presumably believed these idols had power over their lives, they believed that their idol god could cause them much suffering in life if they pissed it off, or worse still it might kill them outright.  If this "gradual change" hypothesis is to seriously considered we must believe that within hours of Muhammad taking control of Mecca these people could abandon their deep-routed long-held mortal fear of their idol gods, but thought that asking them to stop drinking alcohol and fucking children was asking too much?

    I rest my case Smiley

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #470 - May 28, 2010, 02:32 PM

    so how far have you guys got with this book, i look forward to it!!

    There is no God but Allah(swt) and Muhammad(saw) is his messenger.
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #471 - May 28, 2010, 02:40 PM

    I am not sure whether I would call this verse at best indifferent, dont you think this  quranic verse means at best that alcohol is nourishing and good for you?


    Nevermind that verse islame, check out the verse just before that, seems that Mo have skipped many anatomy classes!
    Quote
    And most surely there is a lesson for you in the cattle; We give you to drink of what is in their bellies-- from betwixt the feces and the blood-- pure milk, easy and agreeable to swallow for those who drink.


    ...
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #472 - May 28, 2010, 03:00 PM

    so how far have you guys got with this book, i look forward to it!!


    Only Chapter 2 and the first couple of sections from Chapter 4 have been translated so far.

    This project is going to take a very long time unless we can get more help - it is not a simple text to translate and we all have busy lives.

    Check out Aziz's thread here (but please don't post in it - It's "Read Only"):

    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=10465.0
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #473 - May 28, 2010, 03:02 PM

    no problem, i have read what has been translated so far!! and interesting reading!!

    There is no God but Allah(swt) and Muhammad(saw) is his messenger.
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #474 - May 28, 2010, 03:36 PM

    I don't think the good nourishment is related to the drinks though, but to the fruits of the date-palm, and grapes. Since it breaks up the sentence with AND (also).


    That's what I told him from the very beginning, but perhaps now that you're telling him this, he "might" believe it.  

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #475 - May 28, 2010, 03:39 PM

    no problem, i have read what has been translated so far!! and interesting reading!!


    Hello, first of all, please forgive me for the way I behaved the other day.. anyway, there is a (Muslim?) member who truly need your help... he believes that Hell is only *mental* torment and that worship now (these days) only means that we should be good towards each other (no need for prayers, fasting, etc)... please help him... his name is AbuYunus2... Smiley

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #476 - May 28, 2010, 03:42 PM

    I had the same conversation with the Muslim guy up the road about keeping slaves and fucking children.  Muhammad fucked a 9 year old girl to show that you should not fuck little children, but obviously people wouldn't like not being able to fuck any children at all so Muhammad knew that once he had increased the age limit to 9 we would over time continue to increase it to a more suitable age, you cannot expect people to change over night.

    My reply went something like this:
    Putting aside the fact that this is bollocks because there are places in the world where under Islamic culture people are still marrying (and presumably fucking) 9 year old girls, why could we not expect them to give things up immediately?  These people used to have god idols made of wood/stone, they presumably believed these idols had power over their lives, they believed that their idol god could cause them much suffering in life if they pissed it off, or worse still it might kill them outright.  If this "gradual change" hypothesis is to seriously considered we must believe that within hours of Muhammad taking control of Mecca these people could abandon their deep-routed long-held mortal fear of their idol gods, but thought that asking them to stop drinking alcohol and fucking children was asking too much?

    I rest my case Smiley


    Is there no limits for your intelligence?  wacko

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #477 - May 28, 2010, 03:50 PM

    That's what I told him from the very beginning, but perhaps now that you're telling him this, he "might" believe it. 

    I dont given the "at best" scenario to which you were referring and the fact that it says "also" i.e. "and (also) good nourishment", although admittedly I can see the other angle to it.

    So ignoring the "AND" for a second, the context of this question seems to imply Allah is proud of his ability to create it for his people.  And I wont ask why he bothered to create such things that alcohol can be created from in the first place.

    But do you accept "at best" Allah here seems proud of what he created.  If so then could he not have been ok with alcohol at that time?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #478 - May 28, 2010, 03:56 PM

    Is there no limits for your intelligence?  wacko

    I thought it was an excellent point.  So many things that are bad in the Quran are simply dressed up as everybody was doing it at the time anyway, so it had to be brought in slowly.  Same argument goes with why Muhammed had a slave, alchohol, paedophilia. 

    When we talk of an omnipotent & omnicicient God it just makes no sense, there are much better ways of stopping people from carrying out such deeds, without carrying them out yourself and blaming it on everyone else!

    Just because you have some issue with the poster, you shouldnt knock him personally, particularly when he certainly doesnt lack in intelligence!

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Discussion about "My Ordeal with the Qur'an"
     Reply #479 - May 28, 2010, 03:59 PM

    I repeat: the verse is about the miracle that fruits can be nourishments AND can make you drunk...

    the next verse, which to you all believe is a big flaw in anatomy, is emphasizing the well known fact that animals, while they carry blood/refuse in their bodies, they can still give us delcious milk, as another miracle...

    These verses are emphasizing well-known everyday "sharp contrasts" as miracles, but to you, the first one is endorsing alcohol and the second one is anatomically wrong! Believe what you want, Islame...

    in any case, I should concentrate on wrapping up and preparing to leave... the only reason I still check this forum at these busy days so often is my love for of Hassan...  Embarrassed

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Previous page 1 ... 14 15 1617 18 ... 61 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »