The only way I can accept that there is no transcendent aspect to reality if all of reality can be absolutely known at once in a rational manner.
But do you think this is a fair way of looking at it i.e. that if we dont understand it yet, then what you suppose must be true?
Unless we can prove it right away, then transcendence is by default the truth?
And yes, that awe-inspiring feeling you are talking about bd is the centremost aspect of transcendence so we are talking about the same thing
I dont get it then, what is transcendence, as that to me just sounds like it means being very amazed?
I realise its hard to define it to somebody who has never experienced it, I guess its like describing sight to a blind man.
Kant describes it as being beyond the limits of experience and hence unknowable, which obviously doesnt help