So you're African and a Muslim but married to a Christian and believes the infidels will face hellfire...did i get that right?
People are so weird but...whatever makes your marriage work dude.
I was about to put the same video up but you beat me to it!
.
Anywho....
.
I'm usually never interested in defending Muslim actions, beyond the 4th Caliph (Ali). Why should I care to defend them when they were such "great Muslims" to the point of chopping off the head of the prophet's beloved grandson (Hussein) and demolishing the Holy of Holies (the Kaaba)?!
But this video you posted is so full of lies, I don't even know where to begin. Like I said, Muslims (after Ali) are not worth defending, but I still hate lies, even if they were said about people who don't deserve any defending. How about we begin with the fucking lie that "Abd" is the Arabic word for a black man? True, it's used in some of today's local Arabic accents as a deragotary term, but "Abd", in classical Arabic, does NOT mean a black slave, it means "slave", period.
Also, this lying piece of shit, the fucking commentator in that video, said that the Muslims castrated ALL their male slaves, used them in wars and then killed them all after they captured new slaves! Like I said, I wouldn't have commented if this were true, nor would it have affected my faith anyway, since, again Muslims killing Hussein or destroying the Kaaba reflects on Muslims and not Islam... However, again, Muslim Sultans did castrate some of their slaves, but only those who were responsible for taking care of their Harems...
Muslims did use slaves in wars, in fact there were slaves with high military ranks, but the Sultans didn't routinely kill them after the wars... and the fuckwit (the commentator) had the nerve to refer to the Fatimites (of Egypt) as an example of a Muslim dynasty who did this, when the fact is, in Egypt, the Army Slaves got so powerful, they even took over the court!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mamluk_Sultanate_(Cairo)
The Mamluk Sultanate was a regime composed of mamluks who ruled Egypt and Syria from the mid-1200s to the early 1500s. By the time of the fall of the Ayyubids, most Mamluks were Kipchak Turks.[2] While Mamluks were purchased, their status was above ordinary slaves, who were not allowed to carry weapons or perform certain tasks. Mamluks were considered to be ?true lords,? with social status above freeborn Egyptians.
How can people lie so shamelessly?
Topic: Peace, All