Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Muslim grooming gangs sti...
Today at 07:08 PM

Islam and Science Fiction
Yesterday at 11:57 PM

New Britain
Yesterday at 09:32 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 08, 2025, 01:38 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 07, 2025, 01:11 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 05, 2025, 10:04 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
February 02, 2025, 04:29 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 01, 2025, 11:48 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 01, 2025, 07:29 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Evolution and Morality

 (Read 48354 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 7 8 910 11 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #240 - June 30, 2010, 04:54 PM

    As far as I'm aware, there is no irrefutable evidence which shows that men can tell when a girl has begun menstruating. So I don't see how it would be a turn off. How physically developed could she look at 9?


    As girls approach their teen years, many changes occur to prepare their bodies for adult life. The body grows taller, forms breasts, and grows hair. Another change prepares the body for pregnancy. Once the body, brain and womb
    are old enough, a monthly bleeding cycle occurs
    .. http://womens-health.health-cares.net/menstruation-age.php

    I think in pedophilia the signs of puberty is a turn off. (hence why they are exclusively attracted to pre-pubescent children)

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #241 - June 30, 2010, 05:07 PM

    Not to sound like an asshole but no I haven't. I have helped out friends but only cause they were my friend. for example I really didn't give a shit about haiti. when 9-11 happened I was pissed that they cancelled the baseball games cause I wanted to bet on them.


    :O, you asshole! (Kidding.) You should try it sometime, hopefully it will help you to understand why people do it.

    So these friends, why did you help them out?

    Quote
    Granted both of the things you and I are suggesting is all theory.


    Well if you have a refutation of the gene-centred vew of evolution, I would like to hear it. :/

    Quote
    But it seems that the most successful people in history are those that stepped on other humans to get where they were.


    It would depend on what you deem successful, and why so.

    Quote
    It's like I like you prince spinoza but if you are eating, sleeping and fucking while I'm not...I will eat your cookies (or atleast try).

    If what your are asserting is true why would we ever experience jealousy?


    Because most people only share 90-odd percent of my genes (I know what's coming here), I want to propagate all of my genes, but that isn't really possible.

    Quote
    If you have a hot girlfriend and some guy came along that was genetically superior to you in every way would you encourage your girl to mate with him for the good of humanity? And then feel good about it because humanity benefits?


    See above. ^^ I want MY genes (or rather, my genes do) to remain in the gene pool, but the same alleles are present in other organisms. So helping these other organisms to live fulfilling lives and to reproduce is beneficial to them (the genes). It gets very complicated but generally we can weigh the cost against the benefits and decide if it's worth doing X for organism Z. (I wouldn't do the above because I would consider the cost too great to my own chances of reproducing, and raising a child with her who, the likelihood is, would have more of my genes than their child would.) Have you never thought why people look after their own? Why you feel stronger for your siblings, who share a high percentage of genes with you, than, say, your second cousins, who share quite a few genes, than with distant relatives than with complete strangers?

    The mistake your making is taking the misleading statement 'survival of the fittest' literally, when it actually should be 'survival of the fit enough'. And for some reason you assume that the survival and reproduction of other organisms is not in my best interests, even if those interests may only be to replicate genes.

    Like I said, the every man for himself approach is less effective for ensuring my genes (in whatever organism they may be present) remain in the gene pool, than forming societies like we have done. I read an article recently about how early man survived through testing times, and out-competed other species, by implementing sanctions on organisms who did not share food, or work as hard, as others.

    Monkeys have a sense of rsponsibilty, they repay favours, they seem to have consiences, they can make judgements about fairness, they will even go so far as to give food to other monkeys who have very little or none at all. This is the result of evolution.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #242 - June 30, 2010, 05:11 PM

    As girls approach their teen years, many changes occur to prepare their bodies for adult life. The body grows taller, forms breasts, and grows hair. Another change prepares the body for pregnancy. Once the body, brain and womb
    are old enough, a monthly bleeding cycle occurs
    .. http://womens-health.health-cares.net/menstruation-age.php

    I think in pedophilia the signs of puberty is a turn off. (hence why they are exclusively attracted to pre-pubescent children)


    That ^^ is completely irrelevant, you said menses would be a turn off, I said paedophiles can't tell whether a girl has begun menstruatuing or not. You can argue that once a girl is outwardly developed past a certain stage, she would no longer be attractive to pedos. We obviously do not know what Aisha looked like when she was 9, but I would hazrd a guess that she had a body that pedos would find arousing.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #243 - June 30, 2010, 05:12 PM

    @DigDug
    The principe of justice may change from an era to another, as animals we evolve and can deduct by our ancestor experience what is right from wrong, what is beneficial and what is dangerous for our survive, that is the way it works, the problem with the religions it is that they claim to be the truth and be applied in any society at any era, what is ridiculous.
    A thing can be moral or immoral depend in the side you are, the point is that you have your own views that you create by your experiences and by taking what you like from other people's views and fighting what you don't like.
    It will never happen that the whole world agree to something, but some views can help some people anyway it is very probable that in the other hands it harms lot of other people, we can't do nothing about that.

    "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense. "
    "We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world. "
    --Buddha
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #244 - June 30, 2010, 05:13 PM

    And the thing about aicha having 9 years while married mohamed makes nonsense as at their era it was a moral thing but now it is considered wrong, if god were smarter he wouldn't let his messanger do something that can make people one doubt about him.

    "Believe nothing, no matter where you read it, or who said it, no matter if I have said it, unless it agrees with your own reason and your own common sense. "
    "We are what we think. All that we are arises with our thoughts. With our thoughts, we make the world. "
    --Buddha
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #245 - June 30, 2010, 05:17 PM

    That ^^ is completely irrelevant, you said menses would be a turn off, I said paedophiles can't tell whether a girl has begun menstruatuing or not. You can argue that once a girl is outwardly developed past a certain stage, she would no longer be attractive to pedos. We obviously do not know what Aisha looked like when she was 9, but I would hazrd a guess that she had a body that pedos would find arousing.


    What i took from that statement was that the signs of puberty occur before menses. Because their "body, brain and womb" are ready. So if her womb is ready to have a child common sense would suggest that her mammories were also.

    Would you yourself consider intercourse with a 12 year old girl who just had her menses to be pedophilia?

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #246 - June 30, 2010, 05:27 PM

    What i took from that statement was that the signs of puberty occur before menses. Because their "body, brain and womb" are ready.


    Ready for menses, yes. :/

    Quote
    So if her womb is ready to have a child common sense would suggest that her mammories were also.


    She may be at the stage where she is ovulating, but we were talking about outward appearances, right? I'm pretty sure girls who look 'immature' can have periods. And at 9, I doubt Aisha would look much more than a child. Girls don't mature into women and then suddenly start menstruating. They are still developing when menstruatuon starts, and it starts at different points for different girls. (If any females here can correct me, I would be grateful. I'm not exactly an expert on this...)

    Quote
    Would you yourself consider intercourse with a 12 year old girl who just had her menses to be pedophilia?


    It would depend on how developed she was.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #247 - June 30, 2010, 05:39 PM

    Ready for menses, yes. :/

    She may be at the stage where she is ovulating, but we were talking about outward appearances, right? I'm pretty sure girls who look 'immature' can have periods. And at 9, I doubt Aisha would look much more than a child. Girls don't mature into women and then suddenly start menstruating. They are still developing when menstruatuon starts, and it starts at different points for different girls. (If any females here can correct me, I would be grateful. I'm not exactly an expert on this...)


    I hope this article sheds more light on it. Although you are correct when you say they are still developing it seems that breasts/pubic hair develop before menses. (remember according to the psychologists it is the PRE-PUBESCENT qualities of children that attract pedos.)

    Normal puberty in girls is a complicated topic. To understand what is normal, we need to start with some basic information. Before any visible changes take place, hormonal changes are occurring for a couple of years. These hormonal changes start in the adrenal glands, two small organs that rest on top of either kidney. These hormones send signals to an area of the brain known as the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland. The hypothalamus and the pituitary, in turn, send hormonal signals to the gonads, which in the case of girls, are the ovaries. This system of signaling takes a couple of years to become fully established, but once it does, then the physical, visible changes that we call puberty begin to take place.
          
    Puberty follows a fairly consistent sequence in girls. Doctors stage the physical changes on a scale of 1 to 5, called Tanner staging. Children who do not show any physical changes of puberty are at Tanner stage 1. Adults who have completed puberty are at Tanner stage 5. For girls, Tanner staging is done to assess both breast and pubic hair changes. Sometimes the changes in these two areas are not at the same Tanner stage at the same time, and that is okay.

    The first visible changes are usually the development of breast buds (known as thelarche). This usually occurs between ages 7 to 13 and marks the transition to Tanner stage 2. Again ethnicity plays a factor in the age at which puberty first appears. Up to 15% of African-American girls with have breast buds by age seven years. Percent body fat is another factor associated with the earlier onset of pubertal changes. However, many overweight girls only appear to have breast development because of increased body fat deposited on the chest. This “pseudo” breast development can usually differentiated from real breast development by a doctor during the physical exam. Breast budding may begin on one side before the other and is often accompanied by tenderness. The tenderness generally goes away in a few months.
    Following breast development, most girls then have the development of coarse, dark pubic hair (adrenarche) generally limited to the labia majora. This is also Tanner stage 2. Some girls (about 15%) will have the development of pubic hair before breast development. The amount of pubic hair increases to an almost adult amount prior to the onset of the menses (Tanner stage 3).

    The onset of the menstrual cycles (menarche) begins about 2 to 2 1/2 years after the onset of breast development. Thus, the menstrual cycle can occur anywhere from age 9 to age 15 and be considered 'normal.' Most girls do not have regular, predictable menstrual cycles for another year or two.

    Quote
    It would depend on how developed she was.


    As developed as your average girl who has just had her first cycle.

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #248 - June 30, 2010, 05:50 PM

    I hope this article sheds more light on it. Although you are correct when you say they are still developing it seems that breasts/pubic hair develop before menses. (remember according to the psychologists it is the PRE-PUBESCENT qualities of children that attract pedos.)

    Normal puberty in girls is a complicated topic. To understand what is normal, we need to start with some basic information. Before any visible changes take place, hormonal changes are occurring for a couple of years. These hormonal changes start in the adrenal glands, two small organs that rest on top of either kidney. These hormones send signals to an area of the brain known as the hypothalamus and the pituitary gland. The hypothalamus and the pituitary, in turn, send hormonal signals to the gonads, which in the case of girls, are the ovaries. This system of signaling takes a couple of years to become fully established, but once it does, then the physical, visible changes that we call puberty begin to take place.
          
    Puberty follows a fairly consistent sequence in girls. Doctors stage the physical changes on a scale of 1 to 5, called Tanner staging. Children who do not show any physical changes of puberty are at Tanner stage 1. Adults who have completed puberty are at Tanner stage 5. For girls, Tanner staging is done to assess both breast and pubic hair changes. Sometimes the changes in these two areas are not at the same Tanner stage at the same time, and that is okay.

    The first visible changes are usually the development of breast buds (known as thelarche). This usually occurs between ages 7 to 13 and marks the transition to Tanner stage 2. Again ethnicity plays a factor in the age at which puberty first appears. Up to 15% of African-American girls with have breast buds by age seven years. Percent body fat is another factor associated with the earlier onset of pubertal changes. However, many overweight girls only appear to have breast development because of increased body fat deposited on the chest. This “pseudo” breast development can usually differentiated from real breast development by a doctor during the physical exam. Breast budding may begin on one side before the other and is often accompanied by tenderness. The tenderness generally goes away in a few months.
    Following breast development, most girls then have the development of coarse, dark pubic hair (adrenarche) generally limited to the labia majora. This is also Tanner stage 2. Some girls (about 15%) will have the development of pubic hair before breast development. The amount of pubic hair increases to an almost adult amount prior to the onset of the menses (Tanner stage 3).

    The onset of the menstrual cycles (menarche) begins about 2 to 2 1/2 years after the onset of breast development. Thus, the menstrual cycle can occur anywhere from age 9 to age 15 and be considered 'normal.' Most girls do not have regular, predictable menstrual cycles for another year or two.


    Interesting stuff, but it doesn't really shed much light on the issue, it just varies too much depending on the girl. Aisha could well have had some 'pre-pubescent' qualties as well as some mature 'qualities'. We do not know what she looked like, or what it was about her that attracted Mo, but considering all the 9 year old girls I've seen in my life, there is a very strong chance he had some attraction to prebuscent features. (I still don't see why it has to be exclusive.) There was a hadith too, was there not, where he lay claim to some toddler, and said he would marry her when she was 'ready'.

    Quote
    As developed as your average girl who has just had her first cycle.


    What would that be then? I honestly have no idea.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #249 - June 30, 2010, 06:17 PM

    Interesting stuff, but it doesn't really shed much light on the issue, it just varies too much depending on the girl. Aisha could well have had some 'pre-pubescent' qualties as well as some mature 'qualities'.


    "Following breast development, most girls then have the development of coarse, dark pubic hair (adrenarche) generally limited to the labia majora. This is also Tanner stage 2. Some girls (about 15%) will have the development of pubic hair before breast development. The amount of pubic hair increases to an almost adult amount prior to the onset of the menses (Tanner stage 3).

    The onset of the menstrual cycles (menarche) begins about 2 to 2 1/2 years after the onset of breast development. Thus, the menstrual cycle can occur anywhere from age 9 to age 15 and be considered 'normal.' Most girls do not have regular, predictable menstrual cycles for another year or two."

    Basically breasts and pubes develop before the menstrual cycle starts. So I don't know what else other features you could use to describe a post-pubescent girl. Or on the other hand what qualities would she have that are considered "pre-pubescent"? (i.e. pre-pubescent qualities are the absence of signs of puberty)

    Quote
    We do not know what she looked like, or what it was about her that attracted Mo, but considering all the 9 year old girls I've seen in my life, there is a very strong chance he had some attraction to prebuscent features. (I still don't see why it has to be exclusive.)


    If you and me are sitting in a bar we can call him a pedo all we want. But if we make a website that criticizes Islam we have to be fair in our arguments.

    He does not fit ANY of the criteria that define a pedophile.

    A more fair accusation would be to call him a hebephile but he is still not even a "full blown hebephile"

    Hebephilia refers to the sexual preference for individuals in the early years of puberty (generally ages 11-14, though puberty can vary). It differs from ephebophilia, which refers to the sexual preference for individuals in later adolescence,[1]  and from pedophilia, which refers to the sexual preference for prepubescent children.[2]  While individuals with a sexual preference for adults (i.e., teleiophiles) may have some sexual interest in pubescent-aged individuals,[3]  the term hebephilia is reserved for those who prefer pubescent-aged individuals over adults.


    Quote
    There was a hadith too, was there not, where he lay claim to some toddler, and said he would marry her when she was 'ready'.


    Yes this hadith exists.

    Firstly, it was (and still is) a custom of the Arabs to marry someone based on tribe/lineage. (which is what I believe the hadith to refer to)

    If Muhammad was attracted to her "toddler" features they would surely have disappeared when he married her anyways so I think this is irrelevant.

    Quote
    What would that be then? I honestly have no idea.


    To share a personal story...

    The first sexual experience I had was when i was 12. The girl was in my class and was also 12. The whole thing was initiated by her and I really had no clue waht I was doing.

    She was fully developed (big breasts and pubic hair). She really had no (noticeable) changes occur to her body since then (even height).

    Believe it or not she wasn't a virgin and first had sex when she was 10. (with another child)

    This was the same thing for more than half of the girls in my class and many were (for the most part) phisically developed and some were sexually active (whether that be actual intercourse or oral sex ect..) my point is these girls felt themselves sexually mature and they desired to seek out sex.

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #250 - June 30, 2010, 06:34 PM

    "Following breast development, most girls then have the development of coarse, dark pubic hair (adrenarche) generally limited to the labia majora. This is also Tanner stage 2. Some girls (about 15%) will have the development of pubic hair before breast development. The amount of pubic hair increases to an almost adult amount prior to the onset of the menses (Tanner stage 3).

    The onset of the menstrual cycles (menarche) begins about 2 to 2 1/2 years after the onset of breast development. Thus, the menstrual cycle can occur anywhere from age 9 to age 15 and be considered 'normal.' Most girls do not have regular, predictable menstrual cycles for another year or two."

    Basically breasts and pubes develop before the menstrual cycle starts.


    "Onset." They could still look immature when their period begins. They could still be almost flat-chested when they have their first period.

    Quote
    So I don't know what else other features you could use to describe a post-pubescent girl. Or on the other hand what qualities would she have that are considered "pre-pubescent"? (i.e. pre-pubescent qualities are the absence of signs of puberty)


    Lots of things. Waist-to-hip ratio, for instance.

    Quote
    If you and me are sitting in a bar we can call him a pedo all we want. But if we make a website that criticizes Islam we have to be fair in our arguments.

    He does not fit ANY of the criteria that define a pedophile.


    Really? He was sexually attracted to a 9 year old. This is a 9 year old (apparently).



    Of course we don't know what Aisha looked like, but most 9 year olds I've seen look like the above.

    Quote
    A more fair accusation would be to call him a hebephile

     

    Yeah, that doesn't really have the same ring to it, and I could care less what a 1400 year old corpse is accused of being.

    Quote
    Yes this hadith exists.

    Firstly, it was (and still is) a custom of the Arabs to marry someone based on tribe/lineage. (which is what I believe the hadith to refer to)

    If Muhammad was attracted to her "toddler" features they would surely have disappeared when he married her anyways so I think this is irrelevant.


    I'm not saying he was attracted to her because she was a toddler, I'm saying he seemed to want to marry her when she reached a similar age to Aisha.

    Quote
    To share a personal story...

    The first sexual experience I had was when i was 12 22. The girl guy was in my class and was also 12 22. The whole thing was initiated by her him and I really had no clue enjoyed waht I he was doing.


    Yo dude, there's no need to make stuff up, tell it like it is. Tongue

    Quote
    This was the same thing for more than half of the girls in my class and many were (for the most part) phisically developed and some were sexually active (whether that be actual intercourse or oral sex ect..) my point is these girls felt themselves sexually mature and they desired to seek out sex.


    It really does not seem like Aisha was the kind of nine year old to seek out sex with a man in his fifties. And here we are talking about relationships with other 12 year olds. I don't know about you, but I am no longer sexually attracted to girls below a certain development point, even though I was when I was younger.

    Edit: got some really dodgy looks for looking at pics of 9 year girls... thanks for that....
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #251 - June 30, 2010, 06:55 PM

     

    "Onset." They could still look immature when their period begins. They could still be almost flat-chested when they have their first period.


    Did you not read what was written. Menses develops 2-2.5 years after breast development. Menses is one of the later stages of puberty.

    Quote
    Lots of things. Waist-to-hip ratio, for instance.


    1. Are we really being honest with ourselves here.

    2. many grown women have don't have an hourglass figure. Waist to hip ratio is due to bodyfat in the hips/thighs. The article mentioned bodyfat. Maybe you should read it again.

    3, could you please mention more of them if there are lots?

    Quote
    Really? He was sexually attracted to a 9 year old. This is a 9 year old (apparently).


    hotlink fail. and showing a picture of a 9 year old really has no bearing on what aisha looked like.

    Quote
    Of course we don't know what Aisha looked like, but most 9 year olds I've seen look like the above.


    This is not a fair argument.

     
    Quote
    Yeah, that doesn't really have the same ring to it, and I could care less what a 1400 year old corpse is accused of being.


    This is exactly my point. You would rather lie and slander someone than make intellectually honest arguments. (this is the behaviour of many ex muslims). This may be due to lack of knowledge in regards to the religion.

    Quote
    I'm not saying he was attracted to her because she was a toddler, I'm saying he seemed to want to marry her when she reached a similar age to Aisha.


    He would have wanted to marry her when she reached puberty ss did every other arab at the time. (and the rest of the world.)

    Quote
    Yo dude, there's no need to make stuff up, tell it like it is. Tongue


    Haha you can believe whatever you want but if you don't think that 12 year olds are having sex you are crazy. I really don't want to waste my time proving this to you either.

    Quote
    It really does not seem like Aisha was the kind of nine year old to seek out sex with a man in his fifties. And here we are talking about relationships with other 12 year olds. I don't know about you, but I am no longer sexually attracted to girls below a certain development point, even though I was when I was younger.


    I agree with your views. I was referring to a relationship i had WHEN I WAS 12.

    But if you call say a older man has a problem if he marries a 12 year old you are basically saying that most men in history are sexual deviants. (i provided proof of this practice...I could provide more if you want)


    PS: it seems when you were confronted with rational arguments that you couldn't answer you began to get irrational and act hostile. You are throwing intellectual honesty out the window due to your emotions.

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #252 - June 30, 2010, 06:59 PM

    I saw the pic. That girl is obviously pre-pubescent so it is irrelevant and posting it is only intended as shock tactic and this type of argument is intellectually bankrupt.

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #253 - June 30, 2010, 07:07 PM

    Wow DigDug. You are spending 11 pages to argue that rape is an evolutionary mechanism that should be employed more, or that it had its advantages. As if there was no other way of propagating genes. That short men with small penises are only here thanks to the Mercy of Religion and Laws Grin

    And now you are spending more time than a muslim would defending Muhammad's action. As if that is a good argument against Islam.. Let me guess there are bunch of muslims reading this and shaking their heads going if only this forum made the kind of arguments DigDug liked I would apostatize on the spot. Well guess what if there are people like that FUCK EM.

    What's next you're gonna get upset and insult the forum?

    No but seriously carry on. It's very interesting.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #254 - June 30, 2010, 07:09 PM

    I saw the pic. That girl is obviously pre-pubescent so it is irrelevant and posting it is only intended as shock tactic and this type of argument is intellectually bankrupt.


    Did it shake your foundations? It should.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #255 - June 30, 2010, 07:10 PM

    My 2c if anyone is interested is that hadith are not a reliable source of history given the way they were transmitted i.e. orally for at least the first two centuries after Muhammad's death. Imagine no TV, no media, - no nothing except stories being passed down by word of mouth for generations. Why the heck should anyone think they would be reliable (including Muslims). Professional hisotrians would laugh at you if you told them you were going to use them to build a historical account of things. Is it really worth having an argument over them? For all we know Aisha could have been in her late teens and people who were telling the stories could have been exagerating about how young she was.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #256 - June 30, 2010, 07:12 PM

    They could have Abu, but why would they?  Its not as if the hadith narrators/writers wanted to make Mohammed look bad, quite the opposite.  So why would they make him sound like  a perv if there was no truth to it?

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #257 - June 30, 2010, 07:13 PM

    Wow DigDug. You are spending 11 pages to argue that rape is an evolutionary mechanism that should be employed more, or that it had its advantages. As if there was no other way of propagating genes. That short men with small penises are only here thanks to the Mercy of Religion and Laws Grin


    You seem to have missed the point of the thread (abuyunus understood it perfectly)

    Quote
    And now you are spending more time than a muslim would defending Muhammad's action. As if that is a good argument against Islam.. Let me guess there are bunch of muslims reading this and shaking their heads going if only this forum made the kind of arguments DigDug liked I would apostatize on the spot. Well guess what if there are people like that FUCK EM.


    It's not about making arguments I "like" its about makin arguments that are TRUE.

    Seriously bro...you seem to dislike me now just because I don't agree with the forum hivemind. Please be fair to me me...are we no longer friends now because I disagree with you?

    I presented you a rational argument. Why don't you respond to it instead of making sarcastic post like this

    Quote
    What's next you're gonna get upset and insult the forum?


    really im not the one getting upset here.


    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #258 - June 30, 2010, 07:15 PM

    Did it shake your foundations? It should.


    its like ok lets forget all logic or medical definitions of hebephilia or pedophilia and post a pic of a child that has not gone through puberty.  Roll Eyes

    Ok forget logic did you see the pic  Roll Eyes

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #259 - June 30, 2010, 07:17 PM

    Logically speaking, DigDug, can you see the difference between the example you quoted - of two 12 yr olds getting it on - and a man in his 50s having sex with a nine yr old?

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #260 - June 30, 2010, 07:17 PM

    They could have Abu, but why would they?  Its not as if the hadith narrators/writers wanted to make Mohammed look bad, quite the opposite.  So why would they make him sound like  a perv if there was no truth to it?


    It is indeed true. But they saw nothing wrong with it. (nor did any of the Arabs at the time)

    Because nobody in history has used this argument (aishas age) in history before recent times. If you are interested in the matter why don't you do a little research.

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #261 - June 30, 2010, 07:19 PM

    Logically speaking, DigDug, can you see the difference between the example you quoted - of two 12 yr olds getting it on - and a man in his 50s having sex with a nine yr old?


    Let me state again I do not think that it is right for a man to have sex with a child.

    But what I am saying is that

    1. post pubescent girls desire sex.

    2. child marriage has been the norm throughout history so why is muhammad being treated like a deviant?

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #262 - June 30, 2010, 07:23 PM

    Wow DigDug. You are spending 11 pages to argue that rape is an evolutionary mechanism that should be employed more, or that it had its advantages.


    I think that's unfair - he didn't say that at all. And i think his whole 'don't go round calling Mo a Pedo' thing is only with the intention to build better relationships with Muslims i.e. there are many moderate peaceful Muslims who are very decent people, who still beleive that Muhammad had sex with a nine-year old but that it was not paedophillia at that particular time. I think what he is saying is that if we then go on calling Muhammad a Pedo - this will alienate even those peaceful moderate Muslims from a more secular environment.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #263 - June 30, 2010, 07:26 PM

    Quote
    1. post pubescent girls desire sex.


    There is no evidence that Aisha was post pubescent.  Even if she was, I never came across a nine yr old who desired sex with an old man of 53, no not even one who had her first period.

    Also, getting away from Aisha to the larger point - when we're talking about humans rather than other primates, consent is a factor.  So regardless of whether a girl is biologically post pubescent she may or may not be psychologically mature enough to give consent.  

    Quote
    2. child marriage has been the norm throughout history so why is muhammad being treated like a deviant?


    Because it is not the norm now, and people are still holding him up as the perfect example to follow.

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #264 - June 30, 2010, 07:28 PM

    I think that's unfair - he didn't say that at all. And i think his whole 'don't go round calling Mo a Pedo' thing is only with the intention to build better relationships with Muslims i.e. there are many moderate peaceful Muslims who are very decent people, who still beleive that Muhammad had sex with a nine-year old but that it was not paedophillia at that particular time. I think what he is saying is that if we then go on calling Muhammad a Pedo - this will alienate even those peaceful moderate Muslims from a more secular environment.


    OK I'm not going to respond to that out of respect to you. I was going to write something very rude. I'm done with this thread.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #265 - June 30, 2010, 07:34 PM

    They could have Abu, but why would they?  Its not as if the hadith narrators/writers wanted to make Mohammed look bad, quite the opposite.  So why would they make him sound like  a perv if there was no truth to it?


    In general people have a tendency to exaggerate when telling stories - even I do it sometimes. If having sex with nine-year olds was no big deal at the time - they wouldn't necessarily be making Muhammad to look like a perv by saying it was something he did.

    Another possibility might be that down the years after Muhammad's death, men might have exaggerated how young Aisha was to make sex with 9-year olds seem more normal - so that they could do the same without inhibition. This might be a cynical view - but it's certainly possible.

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #266 - June 30, 2010, 07:36 PM

    Quote
    Another possibility might be that down the years after Muhammad's death, men might have exaggerated how young Aisha was to make sex with 9-year olds seem more normal - so that they could do the same. This might be a cynical view - but it's certainly possible.


    That's actually a very good answer.  Cynical maybe, but it rings truer than any other response I've heard.  Glad I asked you now.   Afro

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #267 - June 30, 2010, 07:39 PM

    There is no evidence that Aisha was post pubescent.


    I have been unable to find a hadith where aisha literally says "and then I had my menses" but I think everybody knows that this is the cultural practice of the arabs at the time. Even the extreme critics don't try and suggest Muhammad had intercourse with her before her menses.

    Abu bakr gave permission for her to be married The fact that aisha's own mother prepared her for the marriage show that there was no problem with the marriage. If there was a problem, the Muslims would have questioned him (as they did with his marriage to zaynab) let alone his enemies using this to attack him.

    Also there is evidence from the quran

       Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if ye have any doubts, is three months, and for those who have no courses (it is the same): for those who carry (life within their wombs), their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make their path easy.

    This shows that women are not to be married until they have had their courses. The part of that ayah that refers to women who have no courses is those that menopausal.

    Quote
     Even if she was, I never came across a nine yr old who desired sex with an old man of 53, no not even one who had her first period.


    This is a fair point.

    But it would also be unfair to assume that it is not possible.

    But saying "I never came across a nine yr old who desired sex with an old man of 53, no not even one who had her first period." is in itself a totally fair argument and I even suggested something similar to this earlier in the thread.

    Quote
    Also, getting away from Aisha to the larger point - when we're talking about humans rather than other primates, consent is a factor.  So regardless of whether a girl is biologically post pubescent she may or may not be psychologically mature enough to give consent.  


    This is a fair point.

    But noone has presented that. They were saying he was a "pedo" which I'm arguing against.

    Also, we have to paint all of mankind (until recent history) with the same brush we do as muhammad. (i.e criticizing them for marrying girls who were to young "psychologically" to properly give consent)

    Quote
    Because it is not the norm now, and people are still holding him up as the perfect example to follow.


    Let me ask (please respect me and answer this questions)

    Do you believe homophobia to be OK?

    Is homophobia allowed on this forum? and if not why?

    I'm an asshat.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #268 - June 30, 2010, 07:43 PM

    Before we get to the homophobia thing, I want clarification....

    Quote
    Also there is evidence from the quran

       Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses, for them the prescribed period, if ye have any doubts, is three months, and for those who have no courses (it is the same): for those who carry (life within their wombs), their period is until they deliver their burdens: and for those who fear Allah, He will make their path easy.

    This shows that women are not to be married until they have had their courses. The part of that ayah that refers to women who have no courses is those that menopausal.


    The first part of the ayat refers to those who are menopausal, ("Such of your women as have passed the age of monthly courses").  Who does the second part refer to?  You seem to be claiming that the ayat refers to menopausal women twice. 

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Evolution and Morality
     Reply #269 - June 30, 2010, 07:43 PM

    In general people have a tendency to exaggerate when telling stories - even I do it sometimes. If having sex with nine-year olds was no big deal at the time - they wouldn't necessarily be making Muhammad to look like a perv by saying it was something he did.

    Another possibility might be that down the years after Muhammad's death, men might have exaggerated how young Aisha was to make sex with 9-year olds seem more normal - so that they could do the same without inhibition. This might be a cynical view - but it's certainly possible.


    This is an interesting theory.

    But I know you call into question alot of hadiths and you are entitled to your opinion.

    But for we who criticize Islam we can't call this hadith into question but then use it as a fact to say "muhammad is a pedo"

    If we don't believe hadiths are true we can't then turn around and use those hadith to criticize Islam.

    I'm an asshat.
  • Previous page 1 ... 7 8 910 11 12 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »