That's right, XxThaminaxX. So the proper comparison IS, as Tlaloc says, between Mecca and Rome and NOT between Mecca and the vatican city. Building a mosque in the Vatican would be like building a church within the Ka'aba area and not in Mecca per se.
As it is a mosque HAS been permitted to be built in the "Holy City" of Rome:
(Clicky for piccy!)Therefore, requesting to build a similarly imposing christian structure in Mecca would be a reasonable request from  Christians to Muslims for reciprocation in kind.
As we have established that the proper comparison is between Rome and Mecca (rather than the Vatican City and Mecca), then it follows as  perfectly reasonable for American Christians and Jews to demand reciprocation from Muslims wanting to build an imposing mosque in New York by being granted permission to build likewise imposing non-Islamic places of worship in Mecca or Medina.
Don't play nonsense and utter shit propaganda with me. Rome is not a "holy city" of any sort. The Vatican is. Therefore the comparing of Mecca to the Vatican is a perfect comparison.
But even so comparing the two is remotely retarded, because Ground Zero isn't to us what Mecca is to Muslims or Vatican is to Catholics.
Ground Zero to us is just a place where once the twin towers existed. Most New Yorkers don't even call it ground zero. Its some nonsense wish washy name given by the media. So keep religion out of the ground zero conversation.
Gotta love these right wing imbeciles. Democrats backed legislature just got turned down because not enough of Republicans. It was a bill that would compensate the many New York emergency responders who were completely affected by the twin tower debris. Those retards all voted it down last week.
But when it comes to their agenda, that's when they only care about 9/11 or anything to do with it