Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


What music are you listen...
by zeca
Yesterday at 06:05 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 22, 2024, 02:51 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 22, 2024, 06:45 AM

Gaza assault
November 21, 2024, 07:56 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
November 21, 2024, 05:07 PM

New Britain
November 20, 2024, 05:41 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 20, 2024, 09:02 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Pantheism

 (Read 19922 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 4 5 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #30 - November 01, 2010, 07:23 PM

    Oh dear, dont start DH'ing on me - not answering questions, and instead asking questions of the questions asked.


    Sorry, habit. Tongue

    Quote
     Alright let me have a go...

    Lets take a paranormal event x, that cannot be explained by y.  Because of that we assume p is made of q.  The leap of faith is assuming the 2 statements above are intrinsically linked.  Relgionists do the same thing too..


    I shall invoke Voltaire's maxim again and ask you to define 'paranormal'.

    Quote
    I used it to mean the opposite of stardust i.e. something metaphysical.



    Ok in that case I don't believe fairydust exists... but I could be wrong... Smiley
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #31 - November 01, 2010, 07:26 PM

    ok whatever  Tongue


    Hey, don't give me a lecture about the ubiquity and universality of science and then run away when I ask you about your 'extra physical' stuff. Tongue
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #32 - November 01, 2010, 07:47 PM

    ok whatever  Tongue

    ''we are morally and philisophically in the best position to win the league'' - Arsene Wenger
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #33 - November 01, 2010, 07:50 PM

    Sorry, habit. Tongue

    I shall invoke Voltaire's maxim again and ask you to define 'paranormal'.

    I normally use a dictionary if I dont understand words

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #34 - November 01, 2010, 07:54 PM

    I don't want the dictionary's understanding of the word, I want yours.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #35 - November 01, 2010, 07:55 PM

    ok whatever  Tongue


    pussy
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #36 - November 01, 2010, 07:57 PM

    Pantheism is the belief in and worship of panties. Hence panty-ism
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #37 - November 01, 2010, 07:58 PM

    I don't want the dictionary's understanding of the word, I want yours.

    magical/mystical/transcending reality

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #38 - November 01, 2010, 08:00 PM

    "transcendent" is a cool word to mask supernatural as a technical and respectable concept.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #39 - November 01, 2010, 08:02 PM

    Pantheism is the belief in and worship of panties. Hence panty-ism


    There is no object of worship except panties.

    We must implement the doctrine of pantheism by deception or by coercion.

    Where the ladies at?

    I have evidence for pantheism.

    I can sniff panties. "Mmmm goood..."
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #40 - November 01, 2010, 08:03 PM

    Pantheism is the belief in and worship of panties. Hence panty-ism

    Where do I sign?  worship

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #41 - November 01, 2010, 08:06 PM

    magical/mystical/transcending reality


    Ok in that case, to the best of my knowledge, I have never experienced a paranormal event.

    "Transcending reality" is a phrase that has the same problem as the word 'supernatural' - it means nothing.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #42 - November 01, 2010, 08:08 PM

    so whatever you experienced could be explained 'rationally' - so why the need for this pantheistic leap of faith?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #43 - November 01, 2010, 08:09 PM

    You never explained how it is a leap of faith.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #44 - November 01, 2010, 08:21 PM

    You never explained how it is a leap of faith.

    FFS, communicating with you is like extracting teeth.

    Here is how I answered before..

    Lets take a paranormal event x, that cannot be explained by y.  Because of that we assume p is made of q.  The leap of faith is assuming the 2 statements above are intrinsically linked.  Relgionists do the same thing too..


    Just delete the word paranormal if it doesnt apply

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #45 - November 01, 2010, 08:26 PM

    FFS, communicating with you is like extracting teeth.


    You got off lightly.  grin12

    Quote
    Here is how I answered before..

    Just delete the word paranormal if it doesnt apply


    Ok well I will stop you at 'cannot be explained by y'. I fully believe it can be explained by nature. I don't have the explanation... but I didn't claim, or expected, to have it.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #46 - November 01, 2010, 08:30 PM

    thankyou, we're making progress

    Ok well I will stop you at 'cannot be explained by y'. I fully believe it can be explained by nature. I don't have the explanation... but I didn't claim, or expected, to have it.

    in which case explain the logical thought processes that lead you to be a pantheist  Huh?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #47 - November 01, 2010, 08:40 PM

    Am lazeh.

    Long story short - it's an approach, not a belief. God does not exist outside of abstraction - he is a philosophical construct. To define God is to create God.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #48 - November 01, 2010, 08:45 PM

    Am lazeh.

    does this laziness occur with opportunistic timing?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #49 - November 01, 2010, 08:47 PM

    Don't edit posts after I answer you sneaky bugger.  040
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #50 - November 01, 2010, 08:52 PM

    Long story short - it's an approach, not a belief. God does not exist outside of abstraction, he is a philosophical construct. To define God is to create God.

     Huh? Scrub this - I have no idea, what it means. Does this God exist or not?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #51 - November 01, 2010, 08:54 PM

    If so, what makes you beleive it does?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #52 - November 01, 2010, 08:57 PM

    Sure he does. Smiley

    I invented him. Pay attention.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #53 - November 01, 2010, 09:03 PM

    You invented him to make sense of things?  So this 'God' is not applicable to others?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #54 - November 01, 2010, 09:03 PM

    A man once asked a famous Zen master what happens when we die.

    The master answered, "I don't know."

    "What do you mean, you don't know?" the man replied angrily, "aren't you a famous Zen Master?"

    "Yes", said the master, "but I'm not a dead one."

    Too fucking busy, and vice versa.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #55 - November 01, 2010, 09:08 PM

    You invented him to make sense of things?


    No. Remember - approach, not belief.

    Quote
    So this 'God' is not applicable to others?


    Now you're getting it.   Afro

    Some others, but not all.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #56 - November 01, 2010, 09:11 PM

    If its not a belief, dont you believe it?  It's just an alternative approach you use to 'see' things?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #57 - November 01, 2010, 09:13 PM

    If it's not a belief, what's there for me to 'not believe'?

    My only approach, I have no alternative.
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #58 - November 01, 2010, 09:18 PM

    I dont understand what you believe.  Lets start again.  Are you a pantheist, a panentheist or a monist?

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Pantheism
     Reply #59 - November 01, 2010, 09:22 PM

    Pantheist.
  • Previous page 1 23 4 5 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »