Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
February 17, 2025, 11:51 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 15, 2025, 04:00 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 13, 2025, 01:15 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Debunking embryology to my father

 (Read 3360 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Debunking embryology to my father
     OP - November 22, 2010, 11:21 AM

    Hey guys,

    Last weekend I was, as usual because of my critical attitude towards the Holy Words, bombarded with the repetitive cliché miracles by my father, so I decided to take my time and line up my arguments against this nonsense.
    Below you can read the mail I sent him last night. What do you think?
    Are the debunking arguments correct, and do you have more to add?

    Greets
    ----------------------------------------------------------

    Hello,

    http://www.islamicmedicine.org/embryoengtext.htm

    This website explains how an embryo develops according to the Quran.
    The most important verses are Sura 24, verse 12 to 14
    "Verily We created man from a product of wet earth; (12) Then placed him as a drop (of seed) in a safe lodging; (13) Then fashioned We the drop a clot, then fashioned We the clot a little lump, then fashioned We the little lump bones, then clothed the bones with flesh, and then produced it as another creation. So blessed be Allah, the Best of creators! (14)"

    The stages are, according to the website:
    1) Nutfa: sperm/drop, which starts to grow to an Alaqa from approx day 15 till day 23
    2) Alaqa: which translates to formless clot, becomes mudgah from day 24 till day 26
    3) Mudgah: this grows  till the end of the 6th week (day 42). The heart starts beating from week 5.
    4) Bones: in a few days (end of the 6th week) these grow and form a skeleton in the embryo
    5) Muscles: after the skeleton is formed, the muscles form around the bones (day 48 and further)


    Criticism

    1) The stages are (vague as they are) in line with modern embryology, except for the last 2 stages. On the website it says that we used to think bones and muscles were formed somewhat simultaneously, but recent microscopic research has shown that the skeleton is formed first, and only after it's formed the muscles grow around it.
    "Until very recently, embryologists assumed that the bones and muscles in an embryo developed at the same time. For this reason, for a long time, some people claimed that these verses conflicted with science. Yet, advanced microscopic research conducted by virtue of new technological developments has revealed that the revelation of the Quran is word for word correct.  These observations at the microscopic level showed that the development inside the mother's womb takes place in just the way it is described in the verses. First, the cartilage tissue of the embryo ossifies. Then muscular cells that are selected from amongst the tissue around the  bones come together and wrap around the bones"

    However, the author gives NO reference to support last statement. I've searched the internet to find a definitive answer to the question if the skeleton is indeed formed first, but couldn't find any right away. What I did find is that bones and muscles are derived from the same layer, the Mesoderm layer (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesoderm). This COULD indicate that a simultaneous growth is possible, but I can't say for sure.
    An assignment for you then: find me scientific proof that the skeleton is formed first, and only after this the muscles grow; and that the growth doesn't happen simultaneously.


    2) When you scroll all the way down the first linked page, you'll see references, but those are just the usual references to the same Islamic propaganda: the so called scientist who proved the Quran is scientifically accurate. I have 2 remarks about this.
    First, the references date from the 80's and 90's.
    Second, all those scientist were at the same conference in Saudi Arabia, they are not independent scientists. Is it crazy to think they were paid by the Saudi's to say the things they said? If you search a bit, you'll find that they didn't convert to Islam. Why not, if they believe the Quran is the word of God?
    For example: Keith Moore, so called scientist who claims the Quran is indeed the word of Allah, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DhJYxI2dlGQ
    My reaction to this can be summarized in the next video, made by a guy who researched a bit about Dr. Moore, see
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mCaMnCGmAU


    3) On the website explaining Quranic embryology, the author quotes from Sahih Muslim, which says that after about 42 days the embryo is formed, which more or less is in line with science. However, what the author doesn't quote is the next one from Sahih Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 549 (http://www.quranenglish.com/hadith/Sahih_Bukhari/055.htm):
    "Allah's Apostle, the true and truly inspired said, "(as regards your creation), every one of you is collected in the womb of his mother for the first forty days, and then he becomes a clot for an other forty days, and then a piece of flesh for an other forty days."

    This contradicts with both Sahih Muslim, the statements in the Quran and science, as the embryo is only formed after three times 40 days.


    4) As I said earlier today, the stages mentioned in the Quran were known long before Muhammad dictated them. To compare the stages as described by the Greek centuries before, visit this site:
    http://www.scribd.com/doc/15730963/Embryology-Myths-in-the-Koran#


    People need to learn to research and think. There is nothing unreligious about this, this is just critical thinking.

    Greets

    <dust>: i love tea!!!
    <dust>: milky tea
    <three>: soooo gentle for my neck (from the inside)
    <dust>: mm
    <three>: it's definitely not called neck
    <dust>: lol
    <three>: what's the word i'm looking for
    <dust>: throat
  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #1 - November 22, 2010, 01:06 PM

    Theres already an unofficial video series debunking all claimed quran miracles.

    link in my signature.

    Still, great post though  Smiley
  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #2 - November 22, 2010, 02:09 PM

    the embryology miracle is just plain plagiarism from the ancient greeks, like many other things in kuran... Maby it is hard to say it is plagiarism... I think it is more correct to say that this knowledge was at their time their current scientific stance, and they used all of it to make their claims more realible... Imagine today some prophet comes along and says that some voice in his head is saying "We who haveth created a unique receipt for each human in molecular basis (DNA), we also gaveth them (humans) a unique spirit for each of them and those spirits shall be judged when the universe, which we have created with a big explosion that brought space,matter and time into begin, implodes.

    Just look at the sun and the moon, rotating around the earth perfectly! Out of all the never ending space in the universe, the sun and moon ended up close to earth rotating around it perfectly.!!

  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #3 - November 22, 2010, 03:59 PM

    Hey three3, you can add the 3 part videos of embryology from mighty_cats channel.
    Also as Badhi said, the sources in the quran about embryology came from ancient Greek scientists, who actually operated on many pregnant women on various stages of their pregnancy.
    So when they were inline with science, it gave more credibility to quran. But there were many pieces of information were missing at that time. And there were mistakes. And same mistakes were repeated in quran like there is absolutely no mention of female egg.

    Admin of following facebook pages and groups:
    Islam's Last Stand (page)
    Islam's Last Stand (group)
    and many others...
  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #4 - November 22, 2010, 04:45 PM

    Hi all,

    I'm well aware of mighty's fantastic collection of debunking video's ;-) I've watched many of them, including the embryology clips.
    However, it wouldn't be effective to just send him a couple of links by mail to videos debunking them miracles, because he wouldn't pay a lot of attention to it, thinking in advance the maker of such videos MUST be a lying infidel. No kidding, when I told him about the existence of such videos, his first reaction was "such people are jews, it's a plot against Islam, and you're falling for it".
    Talk about being paranoid and close-minded...oh religion :-)

    I can imagine his reply already to this email
    1) the website says bones develop first, then muscles; you say you don't know, which means so far the website is correct (haven't been proven false)
    2) there are no scientist who say the Quran is FALSE, so the Quran is still correct, even if those men aren't real scientists (doesn't matter if I find someone who does criticize the Quran, he'll just count him with the Jews with their plot against Islam)
    3) The prophet was also only human, he might have made a mistake in Sahih Bukhari saying development requires 120 days; this doesn't disprove his prophethood or the correctness of the Quran.
    4) I wonder how he'll react to that... Smiley

    @Muddy: it's true that it doesn't mention an egg in that verse, but if i'm not mistaking I think there's a verse that says "mingling" somewhere, which is interpreted as the mixture of the sperm with the egg.

    I'll post his reply in this thread as soon as I get one.

    Oh, one more thing: because of my attitude towards dem miracles he decided to organize a lecture with an imam guest speaker (followed by Q&A) about the existence of Allah. It's going to be called "God exists!"  Cheesy
    Haven't decided yet if I'll go, but if I do, I'll be well prepared debate the so called miracles  dance

    <dust>: i love tea!!!
    <dust>: milky tea
    <three>: soooo gentle for my neck (from the inside)
    <dust>: mm
    <three>: it's definitely not called neck
    <dust>: lol
    <three>: what's the word i'm looking for
    <dust>: throat
  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #5 - November 22, 2010, 06:21 PM

    That mixing is about female blood if I remember correctly.
    Where do you live by the way, may be someone of us in your area would also love to join the debate.  grin12

    Admin of following facebook pages and groups:
    Islam's Last Stand (page)
    Islam's Last Stand (group)
    and many others...
  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #6 - November 22, 2010, 06:36 PM

    deleted

    <dust>: i love tea!!!
    <dust>: milky tea
    <three>: soooo gentle for my neck (from the inside)
    <dust>: mm
    <three>: it's definitely not called neck
    <dust>: lol
    <three>: what's the word i'm looking for
    <dust>: throat
  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #7 - November 22, 2010, 06:51 PM

    oh, ok..

    I hope that imam is only one, and don't bring a whole team with him.

    Admin of following facebook pages and groups:
    Islam's Last Stand (page)
    Islam's Last Stand (group)
    and many others...
  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #8 - November 22, 2010, 07:04 PM

    By the way, I found this great article which will fill in the gaps.

    http://www.bible.ca/islam/islam-myths-embryology.htm

    Admin of following facebook pages and groups:
    Islam's Last Stand (page)
    Islam's Last Stand (group)
    and many others...
  • Re: Debunking embryology to my father
     Reply #9 - November 23, 2010, 03:40 AM

    Dr. Keith Moore is a fraud. In the 3rd edition of his book The Developing Human, he refer Dr. J Needham and his book The History of Embryology. In that book Dr. Needham states:

    "Arabic science, so justly famed for its successes in certain fields such as optics and astronomy, was not of great help to embryology." (J. Needham (Cambridge, 2nd edition), A History of Embryology, p. 77)

    After listing some of the verses in the Qur'an about embryology he dismissed them as merely:
    "a seventh-century echo of Aristotle and the Ayer-veda",

    There are also two different editions of Moore's book:

    The standard edition which is used in the west and the Islamic edition which is used in Muslim colleges. The Islamic edition of his book cannot be found in the British Library, nor it be found in the US Library of Congress, nor in Medical Libraries in western country. Moore does not want to risk his reputation as a prominent academic in the western world, which is why the Islamic edition of his book cannot be found these places.

  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »