Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Ex-Muslims on Mythvision ...
by zeca
November 02, 2025, 07:58 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 02, 2025, 09:14 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 01, 2025, 12:31 PM

ركن المتحدثين هايد بارك ل...
by akay
October 30, 2025, 08:24 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
October 23, 2025, 06:54 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
October 23, 2025, 01:36 PM

New Britain
October 21, 2025, 01:10 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
October 07, 2025, 09:50 AM

What's happened to the fo...
October 06, 2025, 11:58 AM

Kashmir endgame
October 04, 2025, 10:05 PM

الحبيب من يشبه اكثر؟؟؟
by akay
September 24, 2025, 11:55 AM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
September 20, 2025, 07:39 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed

 (Read 12179 times)
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #30 - December 15, 2010, 02:43 AM

    Would you kill your son if god commanded it?

    19:46   <zizo>: hugs could pimp u into sex

    Quote from: yeezevee
    well I am neither ex-Muslim nor absolute 100% Non-Muslim.. I am fucking Zebra

  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #31 - December 15, 2010, 02:51 AM

    Yes but he would never command me to do such a thing. it would never happen. May be if i was a prophet, i might follow his command word by word but I'm a simple human being.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #32 - December 15, 2010, 02:54 AM

    Emphasis on simple.

    fuck you
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #33 - December 15, 2010, 03:07 AM

    But he wouldn't ever command me to do such a thing


    Why not?

    Are you claiming to know what god will and wont do? Dude you're defo going to hell now.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #34 - December 15, 2010, 03:16 AM

    Would you kill your son if god commanded it?

    Yes but he would never command me to do such a thing. it would never happen. May be if i was a prophet, i might follow his command word by word but I'm a simple human being.


    I as a christian would not give a F if my Christian son converts to paganism. I wouldnt kill him.

    But a muslim father will.


    But for now if you don't mind me one final question: How does an atheist know that he will be punished if he has sex with his own mother? I'm not being disrespectful or anything, but I find it impossible that it's possible for an atheist to differentiate between good and bad. I mean he thinks he will cease to exist the day he dies. So what's the point in helping others out anyways? And what's so wrong with raping my own mother as my book of atheism, (which doesn't exist), doesn't prohibit me from doing so nor considers it as a crime or sin.


    Let me get this straight...

    So... if you son becomes a "pagan" or atheist, he is suddenly perfectly able to fuck his own mother.

    You would not kill him if he becomes a pagan who is able to fuck his mother, but you would if the local priest tells you or God appears in your dream.

    The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #35 - December 15, 2010, 03:22 AM

    And where in the bible does it say that prince spinoza of CEMB in 2010 will decide/judge who will go to hell and who wont? Hmm...just asking a honest quetion that's all.



    Have you read the whole of the bible yet?
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #36 - December 15, 2010, 03:23 AM

    Yes but he would never command me to do such a thing. it would never happen. May be if i was a prophet, i might follow his command word by word but I'm a simple human being.

    Well there is a precedent for God commanding people to kill their sons. I wouldn't count yourself out of being a prophet just yet, Armanduk. I have a feeling your forum posts are prophetic revelations from the fucked up Abrahamic God.  Afro

    19:46   <zizo>: hugs could pimp u into sex

    Quote from: yeezevee
    well I am neither ex-Muslim nor absolute 100% Non-Muslim.. I am fucking Zebra

  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #37 - December 15, 2010, 03:44 AM

    Let me get this straight...

    So... if you son becomes a "pagan" or atheist, he is suddenly perfectly able to fuck his own mother.

    You would not kill him if he becomes a pagan who is able to fuck his mother, but you would if the local priest tells you or God appears in your dream.


    Nope. You are simply putting words into my mouth, or making assumption that I would do This and that. if reality was as stupid as your assumptions, christians would have lynched you alive and deported muslims back to Saudi from UK in the year 1900. You know it and I know it too. Relax! Smiley
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #38 - December 15, 2010, 03:49 AM

    Well there is a precedent for God commanding people to kill their sons. I wouldn't count yourself out of being a prophet just yet, Armanduk. I have a feeling your forum posts are prophetic revelations from the fucked up Abrahamic God.  Afro


    Well Jesus said he was the first and the last, the alpha and omega. He died at the cross and came back three days later. so therefore, since  he is the first and the last, there would be no more sons/prophets etc sent to earth. All other fake false prophets who claimed to be prophets after Jesus's 12 apostles died have been proved false, including Muhammed, from the very own books they authored.

    So therefore, you can't say that I'll ever be a prophet and if God tells me in my dream that I am, then he would be contradicting himself. So nope, you made a fucking fool out of yourself again. Come back with some other good stuff and try again. Good luck Smiley
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #39 - December 15, 2010, 03:50 AM

    So many smart and intelligent people in this forum it's amazing. I'm having a field day lol Smiley
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #40 - December 15, 2010, 04:14 AM

    Nope. You are simply putting words into my mouth, or making assumption that I would do This and that. if reality was as stupid as your assumptions, christians would have lynched you alive and deported muslims back to Saudi from UK in the year 1900. You know it and I know it too. Relax! Smiley


    What exactly did I get wrong?

    Hey, they did. For example, what is known in history as witches hunts, their torture and burning - by the christians, commanded by local (and not local at all) priests.
    Y'know, it had to be done with those who sold their soul to the devil, and do not profess the true faith.

    Of course, today, it is different. Only Muslims would do that, you would only kill your son if God himself speaks to you... Did I get it right this time?

    The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #41 - December 15, 2010, 05:47 AM

    Goodness this is like a car wreck; I know I should turn away but I can't. I tell you, there is nothing like the zeal of a convert! It's both amusing and tragic.

    "And lo, verily hath they spoken, not one of this tribe, upon whom these entreaties were beseeched for the Lord, could giveth a shit."


    Read my blog here: http://dimunituvediva.wordpress.com/
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #42 - December 15, 2010, 06:01 AM

    What exactly did I get wrong?

    Hey, they did. For example, what is known in history as witches hunts, their torture and burning - by the christians, commanded by local (and not local at all) priests.
    Y'know, it had to be done with those who sold their soul to the devil, and do not profess the true faith.

    Of course, today, it is different. Only Muslims would do that, you would only kill your son if God himself speaks to you... Did I get it right this time?


    Read the posts above you.

    Let's say I have a son and God told me to kill him. I would ask him why I should do such a thing. If God tells me to kill someone, do you understand that He (god) would violate his own commandments? Only God has the supreme authority to kill or give life to someone/something. I don't. In the commandments he gave me, he told me not to kill. I'm a human being, not God or a prophet. According to the commandments, I shall not kill.

    By telling me to kill, God would contradict himself. If someone claiming to be God told me to kill, I would think he is satan (Muhammed) pretending to be God, not God.

    Yes may be If I was a prophet BEFORE Jesus came and had a sepcial relationship and covenant with God like Moses did, I might have had to take his orders at face value and kill my son. Problem is: You wanna-be richard dawkin atheist smart-asses don't want to understand that whatever happened to moses died with moses, and his laws are not to be followed by us the Christians.

    Also, Jesus said he is the first and the last, the alpha and omega. He is the fullfilment of our lives on earth. There will be no more revelation after him and that claim has been proven as all other self-proclaimed holy books after the bible has been proven to be false. So therefore, I am not suppposed to receive any revelation from God telling me to kill my son.

    Coward Richard Dawkins is too scared to debate world famous christian apologetic Dr. William Lane Craig. Enjoy! Smiley http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JFamS4RGE_A&feature=related
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #43 - December 15, 2010, 06:05 AM

    Goodness this is like a car wreck; I know I should turn away but I can't. I tell you, there is nothing like the zeal of a convert! It's both amusing and tragic.


    Carwreck what and who? Them asking me stupid non-sense questions like "will you fuck ur mom?" or "will u kill ur son" and calling me names to make themselves appear smarter than their ape daddies ?

    You guys should win the Darwin award Smiley
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #44 - December 15, 2010, 06:28 AM

    Let's say I have a son and God told me to kill him. I would ask him why I should do such a thing. If God tells me to kill someone, do you understand that He (god) would violate his own commandments? Only God has the supreme authority to kill or give life to someone/something. I don't. In the commandments he gave me, he told me not to kill. I'm a human being, not God or a prophet. According to the commandments, I shall not kill.

    By telling me to kill, God would contradict himself. If someone claiming to be God told me to kill, I would think he is satan (Muhammed) pretending to be God, not God.


    Ask him? Think he's a fraud?

    So... you would question God if he tells you something that you understood differently.
    Now isn't that a blasphemy, and a dangerous game, because if you understood wrongfully the commandments of the life wanted by God, then you would question your own God when he tells you it ain't so.
    You know already better, and if someone tells you differently, then it's Satan.

    Ah the sin of Pride...

    The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #45 - December 15, 2010, 06:54 AM

    I didn't understand anything wrongfully, and I don't know anything better. All I know is that I as a child of God have been given commandments to follow and none of them teaches me to kill. You are asking me to know if I would kill my son if he tells me to. Well news flash: He already told me not to kill anyone. Not only that, he not only told me not to kill or hurt my enemies but love and bless them. He told me to follow his life and the examples. Also, you didn't understand what I said about revelations. The final revelation (the bible) was given to us by God. If God now sends me more revelation telling me to fuck my mother or kill my son, that would mean he was a liar when he said he was the alpha and the omega, the first and the last.

    Now you and your monkey god decide whether God should follow what he said and remain consistent with it, or send me further revelations telling me to fuck your monkey mother thus contradicting himself.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #46 - December 15, 2010, 06:58 AM

    Hint: It is because the Abraham religions hold as the highest example of faith a father who would willingly murder his son to expiate his own sins.  To kill another to relieve one's burden is psychopathic in the absolute sense.  Hence, when the foundation of a tradition is a father who is absolutely insane, people tend to raise an eyebrow when we here about what God wants us to do and not do.  Personally I don't trust the guy. 

    So once again I'm left with the classic Irish man's dilemma, do I eat the potato or do I let it ferment so I can drink it later?
    My political philosophy below
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwGat4i8pJI&feature=g-vrec
    Just kidding, here are some true heros
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBTgvK6LQqA
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #47 - December 15, 2010, 08:20 AM

    I read that link (wiki) and it's not a broad explanation. Anyways Let me quote an example of "No true scotsmen" from that link

    A simpler rendition would be:

        Teacher: All Scotsmen enjoy haggis.
        Student: My uncle is a Scotsman, and he doesn't like haggis!
        Teacher: Well, all true Scotsmen like haggis.

    When the statement "all A are B" is qualified like this to exclude those A which are not B, this is a form of begging the question; the conclusion is assumed by the definition of "true A".

    I humbly request you to find out the definition of true A. if you are the student in this case, ask the teacher to give you the definition of the true scotsmen, what they taught, what they did during their lifetimes and so on and so forth. You cant take the teacher's definition at face value. you have to investigate it.

    to make it more simpler, where is the evidence that ALL TRUE SCOTSMEN will like heggies, heggles or whatever it is?

    Ok, so you've totally missed the point. Cool.  Afro

    The point was that you made a blanket statement about Christians. I then pointed out an example of a Christian who had done what you said Christians didn't do. You then changed your definition of Christians to suit the new information. That is classic NTS fallacy.


    Quote
    Okay so you would think I'm an arab by what it says on my passport/birth certificate etc. But since I can't read/speak a single word of arabic, nor look like an arab, you will call me a fake arab just like when a Christian murders an innocent person I will call him a fake christian.

    Does your chewing gum lose its flavour on the bedpost overnight? parrot


    Quote
    I am thankful that you actually took the time to study the bible and have realized that OLD testament's laws are not to be followed by Christians. Many people don't understand that.

    I was raised by Christians. 


    Quote
    I'm not too sure about whether a criminal, who violated the ten commandments and jesus's teachings should be forgiven. I never looked into the "sin" part of Christianity. I will have to ask my local priest and then come back to you on that issue.

    You don't seem to know a lot about your chosen religion. Why did you choose it then?


    Quote
    If jesus supported those laws, why didn't he stone that female adulterer to death when she was arrested and brought to him by the Jews? The jews wanted her dead. But jesus forgave her and let her go. I can quote the verses/story/commentary if needed. But I think you know the woman i'm referring to because it's evident you read the bible.

    Couple of points here. First, it's uncertain if Jesus did do that. It could be one of the later additions to the Bible. Bear in mind that none of the people who wrote the Gospels were eyewitnesses. The Gospels were written some decades after Jesus' death and they were written from hearsay.

    Second, there's only one god in Christianity, right? Father, Son, Holy Ghost are all the same god, who has existed forever. Right? So, if God wrote the Old Testament laws that means Jesus wrote them. They have a lot of stoning in those laws. You could get stoned for all sorts of things. Even rape victims could be stoned. So, if God (meaning Jesus too) wrote those laws, and those laws have stoning as a punishment for lots of things, then Jesus must have supported stoning at the time. Sure, he may have changed his mind later, but for thousands of years (according to the Bible) Jesus must have supported stoning.


    Quote
    "Furthermore, the Old Testament is full of rape and murder and stealing being done at God's command" << Agreed. but they are there for a reason. you have to take a look at them and read the explanations one by one. For example, in Genesis, notice that LOT's daughters make him drink wine and have sex with him (their very own father) and become impregnated.

    Ok, so mass murder of babies and children is cool if you think God is telling you to do it. Thanks for clarifying that. Remind me to keep you away from babies and children. Wink


    Quote
    Now tell me where in genesis did GOD approve incest? Here, God is merely reporting an incident. He didn't approve of that.

    If you're going to quote Genesis, and since you don't believe in evolution, then God had to approve incest because you believe all people came from the same two parents. There is no way of getting the entire human race from two parents without incest. Lots of incest. Hey, it's your belief system. You deal with it.


    Quote
    I have to find out whether a christian would cease being a christian if he violates the laws. But for now if you don't mind me one final question: How does an atheist know that he will be punished if he has sex with his own mother? I'm not being disrespectful or anything, but I find it impossible that it's possible for an atheist to differentiate between good and bad. I mean he thinks he will cease to exist the day he dies. So what's the point in helping others out anyways? And what's so wrong with raping my own mother as my book of atheism, (which doesn't exist), doesn't prohibit me from doing so nor considers it as a crime or sin.

    If you can't figure that out without an instruction manual then you have severe problems.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #48 - December 15, 2010, 08:28 AM

    Armanduk - were Lot and his daughters atheists?

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #49 - December 15, 2010, 06:03 PM

    ^^^^Fuckin schooled, duck

    fuck you
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #50 - December 15, 2010, 07:10 PM

    Good, good, Armanduck.
    You cannot be wrong. If you're told by the local priest (a human being... by accident) that your understanding of what the bible is (the exact "word of God"), and that your understanding of the bible's text (i.e. that God created the world in seven days) are correct, then of course you cannot be wrong. Even though the bible's words changed in time (throughout history), even though the meaning of the bible's text is different even from translation to translation, of course the bible in your language and your time on Earth is "the word of God". The rest are liers or misguided, poor them.
    You cannot be wrong in your understanding of the word of the bible/God, because of course as human being, you have unlimited intellect and no possibility to error.

    ...

    The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #51 - December 15, 2010, 09:02 PM

    ^^^^Fuckin schooled, duck

    schooled on what?

    "Ok, so you've totally missed the point. Cool.

    The point was that you made a blanket statement about Christians. I then pointed out an example of a Christian who had done what you said Christians didn't do. You then changed your definition of Christians to suit the new information. That is classic NTS fallacy."

    ^^^I didn't change the definition. Read again. I asked you to find out the true definition of scotsmen. The teacher claims all scotsmen loves heggies. But is that true? if my local priest tells me to burn a witch, would that be biblical? he might say "it is biblical, jesus ordered us to murder witches and anyone who doesnt murder witches is not a Chritian. All true christians will murder witches" << But is the priest's definition of a true christian correct? To find that out, I would have to refere to the Bible, not scotsmen!

    Few hours ago i had a muslim come in and tell me that proverbs 5:15 orders christians to drink their own pee. If you read the verse, it will indeed look like god is telling you to drink your own pee. But then I read the previous and next 5 verses and it was pretty clear god was telling me to make use of my own wife and not commit adultery with whores. See? the muslim had his own explanation/definition and God had his own.

    You are forcing me to believe that I'm committing NTS fallacy.  Yes I made a blanket assumption on Christians that those who will follow the true teachings and interpretations of the Bible will stick to the ten commandments and will not pay heed to the sexual urge of a local priest who dreamt that I should give him my 4 year old for sex. He will be skeptical and doubtful if a priest tells him to murder people. sorry but bible doesn't teach murder and stuff that Quran teaches.

    Then you say I changed the definition? Who am I to change the definition? I have always stuck to the one and only definition which is that Jesus atoned for our sins and fulfilled the old laws and brought with him new laws in the New testament and we must adhere to his law, not Moses.

    Plagarazing from the internet:

    1) “You shall have no other gods before me.” This command is against worshipping any god other than the one true God. All other gods are false gods.

    2) “You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.” This command is against making an idol, a visible representation of God. There is no image we can create that can accurately portray God. To make an idol to represent God is to worship a false god.

    3) “You shall not misuse the name of the LORD your God, for the LORD will not hold anyone guiltless who misuses His name.” This is a command against taking the name of the Lord in vain. We are not to treat God’s name lightly. We are to show reverence to God by only mentioning Him in respectful and honoring ways.

    4) “Remember the Sabbath day by keeping it holy. Six days you shall labor and do all your work, but the seventh day is a Sabbath to the LORD your God. On it you shall not do any work, neither you, nor your son or daughter, nor your manservant or maidservant, nor your animals, nor the alien within your gates. For in six days the LORD made the heavens and the earth, the sea, and all that is in them, but he rested on the seventh day. Therefore the LORD blessed the Sabbath day and made it holy.” This is a command to set aside the Sabbath (Saturday, the last day of the week) as a day of rest dedicated to the Lord.

    5) “Honor your father and your mother, so that you may live long in the land the LORD your God is giving you.” This is a command to always treat one’s parents with honor and respect.

    6) “You shall not murder.” This is a command against the premeditated murder of another human being.

    7) “You shall not commit adultery.” This is a command against have sexual relations with anyone other than one’s spouse.

    Cool “You shall not steal.” This is a command against taking anything that is not one’s own, without the permission of the person to whom it belongs.

    9) “You shall not give false testimony against your neighbor.” This is a command prohibiting testifying against another person falsely. It is essentially a command against lying.

    10) “You shall not covet your neighbor's house. You shall not covet your neighbor's wife, or his manservant or maidservant, his ox or donkey, or anything that belongs to your neighbor.” This is a command against desiring anything that is not one’s own. Coveting can lead to breaking one of the commandments listed above: murder, adultery, and theft. If it is wrong to do something, it is wrong to desire to do that same something.

    Source: http://www.gotquestions.org/Ten-Commandments.html

    Now read my posts and show me where I changed my definition of a true christian. it's not like i said "christians should murder" and then later changed it to "they shouldn't"

    The christian guy who killed the bride and bridegroom didn't follow a single commandment of the above. If the muslim was his enemy, he not only NOT love and bless him, but he killed him.

    How do you expect me to call him a true follower of Christ, his teachings and his examples?

    Compared to that, read 600 non-abrogated verses of the Quran that teach muslims how to behead non-muslms' head wherever and whenever they are found given that they don't believe in Allah and the last day.

    And where in your monkey god's holy book does it say "though shall not lie with your own mother"? Excuse me even if he doesn't have book, did he ever at least tell you such a thing before he died?

    Like einstein said, "Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind"


    -----------------------------------

    "Does your chewing gum lose its flavour on the bedpost overnight?" << no. stop trying to appear like a smart ass. you didn't answer the question.

    "You don't seem to know a lot about your chosen religion. Why did you choose it then?" Oh u think I'm all-knowing? i'm a human being and imperfect. not everyone knows everything. I was being honest. If i don't know something or not sure of something, i will do a heavy research before commenting on it. I will need evidence to back up my claim. I will not simply not listen to a random wanker who said my ancestors came out of a monkey's ass

    I will talk with the reverend of my church and get back to that topic.

    "Couple of points here. First, it's uncertain if Jesus did do that. It could be one of the later additions to the Bible. Bear in mind that none of the people who wrote the Gospels were eyewitnesses. The Gospels were written some decades after Jesus' death and they were written from hearsay. "

    ^^^^That's what muslims also say when speaking of the bible: "brother brother bible has been corrupt. this has been deleted and this has been added omg our quran is uncorrupt brother!"

    So the verses containing stoning and violence in both the OT and NT are uncorrupt according to you, and the verse in which jesus forgives the adulterer was added to it later? Do you see the double standard here? You are saying one part of teh bible is uncorrupt, to strengthen your argument. Then you're saying that another part of the bible is corrupt/modified to weaken your opponent's argument. What sets you apart from the muslims who will quote verses from the Bible to prove Muhammed was mentioned in it and then says that other verses where jesus claimed divinity were corrupted/modified/added? I don't see a lot of difference between you and a suicide bomb-belt wearing muzzie I'm afraid! Preach on brother!

    we are under the law of Christ (Galatians 6:2), which is to “love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind…and to love your neighbor as yourself” (Matthew 22:37-39). If we obey those two commands, we will be fulfilling all that Christ requires of us: “All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments” and all the laws and prophets don't hang on to Osmanathus's laws, which is that adulterers should be stoned to death

    yes he did support all those but for a reason. Human beings are sinners. And god becomes angry when what he created commits sin. He is righteous and so his punishment is just. If he doesn't judge a criminal, he is not a perfect judge. We know god can not be imperfect. And so therefore, he must punish his children when they go against the laws. That's what we find in the OT.

    Are you saying that your parents never beat you or scolded you when you as a child committed childish mischief (stealing money from dad's pocket, having a fight with fellow siblings, arguing with parents about stuff etc etc). Did you expect to go against the laws of your parents and get away with that? Were you never given a probation by your parents? Was I not beaten up in school by teachers by not doing my homework? Did my mom never beat me up when I didn't eat food regularly (when I was a kid)

    Let me ask you question: So do the above-mentioned acts commited by my teachers and parents mean they didn't LOVE me and hated me instead? Nope. they did that all to help me differentiate the good from the bad, the right from wrong.

    When you steal money from your work and/or fail to perform a duty that you are supposed to carry out, why does your boss get angry and fire you or punish you? ohhhhhhhhhhhh he is so violent right? a boss can't be so violent right? Do you want him to give you a candy when you turn up late for work?

    So, therefore, god sent his son to earth to atone for all our sins and also fulfill the prophecies and the old laws of Moses. we are now under the new laws including the ten commandments, not the laws of the Moses. Get it out of your brain that adulterers, homosexuals etc etc should be stoned to death. whoever says that is outright going against God's teachings. Refer to the ten commandments.

    What I find to be very funny is: Here in the west and europe muslims are being violent and murderous simply by following the quran and hadith and people are defending them. And christians are peaceful, non-murderous and non-violent by default and people are out to make them look violent.

    9/11 didn't teach you people enough lesson. I am telling you...tomorrow if you wake up to find your mother raped by a true follower of muhammed and brother beheaded by a muslim, you will find yourself blaming muhammed, not jesus Smiley





  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #52 - December 15, 2010, 09:03 PM

    QUESTION: Does the bible condone incest? No (see Leviticus 18v6). Incest is illegal and God's People must obey the law of the land.

    Of course in the beginning of mankinds history Adam and Eve were commanded to populate the earth. Adam and Eve had MANY sons and daughters. Since God did indeed intended Eve to become the mother of all mankind (so that the human race would be one family) for the first generation ONLY it would have been necessary to marry a sister or a niece.

    (There was absolutely NO need for any of the children and PARENTS to have sex with each other. Remember, Adam and Eve were, according to Jesus' later testimony, husband and wife and that union was sacred. Anyone having sex with someone elses partner would have been breaking that sacred 'yoke' and acting contrary to God's arrangement)


    For the first children born to ADAM & EVES ONLY =>
    =>first generation ONLY : sister or niece.
    ====>Second generation is first cousins.
    ========>Third generation second cousins.
    =============> Fourth generation (distant cousin - legal in most States even today)....

    ****So only ONE GENERATION needed to partner with someone in their immediate family. Second and third generations with cousins. From there on in there would have been no need to marry anyone in your immediate family ***

    While the timescale and explanations vary, genetically, scientists suggest that all humans living at the moment are in fact related and decendents of what they refer to as "Mitochondrial Eve".

    http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/09/040930122428.htm

    QUESTION: So God would have condoned incest for one generation of people?

    The term "incest" comes from the middle English of the Latin 'incestus' meaning sexual impurity. Who declares something 'impure'? Since God initially (for that first generation) did not declare it yet to be impure it was not incest.

    In its modern sense incest is sexual relations between people closely related forbidden by law to marry; in the absence of law there is no incest. The law of incest came much later in mankind's history* although socially and morally clearly having sex with ones immediate family was socially unacceptable.

    Child-parent incest has NEVER been socially acceptable (thus Lot's daughters saw the need to get their father drunk and try and cover their actions when they sought to have sex with him).

    In time God gave a law code to his people clearly stating that any sexual relations with ones immediate family was highly displeasing to him. (see Leviticus 18:6; Leviticus 20:11-21)

    * Sarah was Abrahams half-sister

    QUESTION: Did God approve of the actions of Lot's daughters? No, there is no indication that God either instructed these women to have sex with their father or that he approved in any way of what they did. The very fact they felt the need to trick their father by getting him drunk indicates that the women were fully aware that what they were doing was totally unacceptable behaviour.

    Some presume that if an account if REPORTED in scripture it automatically means that God approved of that action. This is faulty reasoning since the bible reports Cain killing his brother and even the rebellion of Adam and Eve. Indeed, when a newspaper reports a rape or a murder it is not presumed that the journalist approves of the action.

    Granted God did not immediately destroy the women, but lack of immediate judgement is not synonymous with approval; punishment did come in the way of the illigitimate nation they bore eventually being destroyed.

    The human story is full of murder, rape, violence, incest and many other things that God hates, eventually God communicated his law through the prophet Moses, a law that reflected his righteous standards but before this time, each one followed his own morale compass and the bible does not shy away from reporting the sometimes disasterous consequences of this fact.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #53 - December 15, 2010, 09:06 PM

    "Ok, so mass murder of babies and children is cool if you think God is telling you to do it. Thanks for clarifying that. Remind me to keep you away from babies and children."

    No I don't think that's cool. And unlike you and your monkey god who think it's okay to commit any kind of sexually immoral act and get away with and come out of it guilt-free, i wouldn't killl babies. I'm not god. it's God who did it and he had reasons for it. I already said that in my previous posts. You are like that muzzie who told me "brother brother proverbs 5:15 tells u to drink ur own pee". You are deliberately twisting scripture and taking them at face vallue instead of investigating why god did such things and why god don't do these things and haven't told me to do those things now. and so therefore, retards in this forum who asked me "would u fuck ur mother if god told you to do so?" and "would u kill ur son" are just what they are: retards

    Why did your monkey goad kill innocent babies and lives in the recent earthquake in haiti by the way?
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #54 - December 15, 2010, 09:08 PM


    If you can't figure that out without an instruction manual then you have severe problems. << if you think your ancestors came out of a monkey's ass, and you can't prove to me where in atheism it says it's immoral to have sex with your own mother, then you have a problem much more severe than the muslims do at the moment.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #55 - December 15, 2010, 09:22 PM

    How is doing/not doing something out of fear (of hell) moral?

    Morality comes from empathy and wanting to do good because it's the right thing to do, not because your sky daddy told you to.
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #56 - December 15, 2010, 09:25 PM

    armanduk, if you think you need an instruction manual to be moral, fine but please do not try to justify it like you've done right now. Are you saying you won't commit incest because the bible tells you it's wrong? The wide majority of people have an inherent morality and are good people since they're born but by that logic, shouldn't they all be taught the bible's word because they'll grow up as incestious etc. if they don't?

    "I measured the skies, now the shadows I measure,
    Sky-bound was the mind, earth-bound the body rests."
    [Kepler's epitaph]
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #57 - December 15, 2010, 09:25 PM

     empathy and the willingness to do the right comes from who? Your monkey daddy? see you didn't answer my question but tap-danced around it. I am not dancing with ya but good luck  Afro
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #58 - December 15, 2010, 09:27 PM

    armanduk, if you think you need an instruction manual to be moral, fine but please do not try to justify it like you've done right now. Are you saying you won't commit incest because the bible tells you it's wrong? The wide majority of people have an inherent morality and are good people since they're born but by that logic, shouldn't they all be taught the bible's word because they'll grow up as incestious etc. if they don't?


    "please do not try to justify it like you've done right now" << Is that an order?  Huh?
  • Re: Christian Family in Bangladesh Attacked, Charged with Crime, Bible Destroyed
     Reply #59 - December 15, 2010, 09:27 PM

    Quote
    2) “You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me, but showing love to a thousand generations of those who love me and keep my commandments.” This command is against making an idol, a visible representation of God. There is no image we can create that can accurately portray God. To make an idol to represent God is to worship a false god.


    A jealous God? That's your perfect being, with the human trait of jealousy, a trait many times considered egotistic, self-centered and quite prone to other consequences.
    A nice definition of the perfect being there.

    What branch of christianity are you, armanduck? Many christians make icons and other images of a God, portraits of an old wise man with a beard, images of saints painted on churches, y'know, all that - idols to represent God or the saints, angels, whatnot. And they pray to them, and they bow to them, and they make a humble cross when they go near them.
    Do you do any of those, armanduck?

    Quote
    Few hours ago i had a muslim come in and tell me that proverbs 5:15 orders christians to drink their own pee. If you read the verse, it will indeed look like god is telling you to drink your own pee. But then I read the previous and next 5 verses and it was pretty clear god was telling me to make use of my own wife and not commit adultery with whores. See? the muslim had his own explanation/definition and God had his own.

    (my bolding)

    Wow. So your interpretation IS the word of God.
    You are the one who understands what God is really saying, while others are "only interpretations".

    Well, well. Shall I say again, beware the sin of Pride, armanduck dear? Yer shall end up in Hell for your sins, y'know. That's not living up to the vengeant God's expectations.

    The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, it is the illusion of knowledge.
  • Previous page 1 23 4 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »