I'm kinda on the same wave length.
Ive never found the need to just always criticize how Muslims did things.
I think that empathy is the best way to see it.
There are some amazingly great Muslims out there who follow Islam in the path they believe to be right.
There are those who are genuine and just good people.
Not all Muslims are bad.
Just because most of us are ex-Muslims, it doesnt mean we know everything.
For me, I'm agnostic, so in definition, that means I DONT really know,
so why criticize those who feel that they do know.
Idk, wen ii read this, this is what ii was thinking about.
I want others to respect that im agnostic, and Muslims want to be respected for being Muslim.
Just cuz we chose this way, it doesnt mean its the only way and that we are free to think we are better.
If religion was just a person to person deeply held personal belief about life or the world, or hopes and dreams for their spiritual self, or personal preference or taste, and was unobtrusive and harmless to everyone else, it wouldn't be worthy of so much open criticism. But it's not just that is it? It's a collective, often hysterical and irrational mass belief and school of thought that has so much stranglehold on the world that it affects millions of lives every day whether they agree with it or not, whether they want it to or not. It affects things from who gets to govern the most powerful secular (apparently) nation on earth, to if homosexuals deserve to live or die on the other side of the planet.
When the religions of the world offer themselves up as a complete system of life - law, policy, social, economical, educational, philosophical, even military, and with pretty much the sole aim of converting and controlling the masses - we can criticise them as thoroughly, shamelessly and ruthlessly as we can any constitution or political ideology, or any collection of ideas and principles. As soon as we can’t, we can no longer consider ourselves a democracy.