@Bard
In a post of three paragraphs you score an impressive four departures from fact out of which you build a coliseum of imbecility. But despair not my lovely, I propose to cure you from your imbecility. Let your medical treatment beginneth …
Eventhough talking about sexism and racism which are NOT NATURAL STATES OF THE HUMAN BUT SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIONS versus EATING MEAT WHICH IS A EVOLUTIONARY GIFT/ADVANTAGE THAT MADE US TO THOSE WHO WE ARE TODAY
Setting aside the syntactical atrocity you've created here, the meat industry is no less a social construct than slavery. Animals are herded into cages in which they don’t belong from the cradle to the grave. It’s constructed for the social gain of their exploiters. There’s nothing natural about their captivity.
Going further, if the killing of one species by another is justified on evolutionary grounds so can the killing of one race by another. Human beings have evolved differently and have always killed each other. Aggression against outsiders is perfectly natural. All of which comes back to the fallacy which has been debunked a thousand times: Appeal to nature.
Black slaves were enslaved by their black fellows and sold to black markets even be4 the europeans (or arabs) came over there... So how do you explain that?
The transatlantic slave trade was the process by which one race conquered and enslaved another. Africans may have sold off other Africans to make a buck just as Muslim women are complicit in the subjection of other women by men but it does not alter the fact that racial difference was the driving reason that whites made slaves of blacks because they felt their difference robbed them of their natural rights. The same justification holds for speciesism. And you miss the wider point. Racism is the notion that a man of a different colour does not have the same rights owing to his difference. Ditto Speciesm. To proceed on the grounds of biological difference is to accept the justification for all forms of bigotry.
I doubt you can dismember my body dear mab, since statistically , knowing that you are Turkish, even if you are average Turk, you would be one head smaller than me  + i am younger and have more advantage to kick your ass... But anyway, you would risk getting infected since diseases are transmitted very easy if cannibalism is the norm
I did not say that cannabilism was nutritious. Got that? Mashallah! I said that morally speaking there is no difference between eating a different species or a different race. If you can tell me the difference in moral terms between the one or the other I'm all ears. The only argument against exploiting another race is because their difference does not matter. Only their sentience.
and a last question what do you think about hypocrisy paraded as virtue mab?
What hypocrisy are you talking about? That I've not always been faithful to my diet? I'm beginning to suspect that you don't understand what the word means. A hypocrite is a man who espouses one thing publically and does the converse privately. I'm openly frank with my past moral failures. I haven't dined on flesh for years and don't brow-beat those who do. I'm here to school those who want to defend the indefensible in the true, the good and the beautiful. And we are making progress.
I eat animals because they taste good and because I CAN
I like raping young boys because it feels so good and because I CAN. Would you care to swallow my nine inch meat?
Topic: Being Vegetarian (continued from shout box)