So the CSC has joined with The Henry Jackson Society
http://www.socialcohesion.co.uk/files/1302514904_1.pdfhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_Jackson_SocietyNow, before you dismiss The Henry Jackson Society before you've read the seventh word in the wikipedia article, (i.e. The Henry Jackson Society is a
neo-conservative[citation needed] think tank ...) I would agree citation is needed for that remark because it's Statements of Principles I guess could be interpreted rather Hawkish but it isn't clear cut (well, since they've been updated):
Statement of principlesBelieves that modern liberal democracies set an example to which the rest of the world should aspire.
Supports a ‘forward strategy’ – involving diplomatic, economic, cultural, and/or political means -- to assist those countries that are not yet liberal and democratic to become so.
Supports the maintenance of a strong military, by the United States, the countries of the European Union and other democratic powers, armed with expeditionary capabilities with a global reach, that can protect our homelands from strategic threats, forestall terrorist attacks, and prevent genocide or massive ethnic cleansing.
Supports the necessary furtherance of European military modernisation and integration under British leadership, preferably within NATO.
Stresses the importance of unity between the world’s great democracies, represented by institutions such as NATO, the European Union and the OECD, amongst many others.
Believes that only modern liberal democratic states are truly legitimate, and that the political or human rights pronouncements of any international or regional organisation which admits undemocratic states lack the legitimacy to which they would be entitled if all their members were democracies.
Gives two cheers for capitalism. There are limits to the market, which needs to serve the Democratic Community and should be reconciled to the environment.
Accepts that we have to set priorities and that sometimes we have to compromise, but insists that we should never lose sight of our fundamental values. This means that alliances with repressive regimes can only be temporary. It also means a strong commitment to individual and civil liberties in democratic states, even and especially when we are under attack.
The society's statement of principles have been changed from those first signed by supporters in Cambridge on 11th March 2005, to de-emphasise military methods and to more recognise the legitimacy of international organisations. The original versions were:[9]
Supports a ‘forward strategy’ to assist those countries that are not yet liberal and democratic to become so. This would involve the full spectrum of ‘carrot’ capacities, be they diplomatic, economic, cultural or political, but also, when necessary, those ‘sticks’ of the military domain.
Supports the maintenance of a strong military, by the United States, the countries of the European Union and other democratic powers, armed with expeditionary capabilities with a global reach.
Believes that only modern liberal democratic states are truly legitimate, and that any international organisation which admits undemocratic states on an equal basis is fundamentally flawed.[/li][/list]