You are putting all these religions in the same basket when there's obviously quite important differences. As for example, the concept of martyrdom, a book being the word of God or not, the supposed lives, characters and what those supposed prophets did, as many followers are trying to emulate their examples, .etc.
You don't think that that 99% of suicide bombers being Muslims is just an accident, right? There are external factors of course but still... Also that the majority of terrorist organisations are Islamic. Also an accident?
The concept of martyrdom certainly does exist in Judaism. But it's a less good option than just murdering your enemies. That's also a factor in the suicide bomber rates: if you look at just the number of civilians being killed by ALL bombs and missiles, then Israel is certainly being at least as aggressive, if not more aggressive. But they happen to have missiles that they can use from further away (well, it's not really that it just "happened", it's that they're being bankrolled by American evangelical Christians, but that's another story). Both sides are using the tools that are available to them. The Israelis have tools that mean they can kill without getting their hands dirty from pretty far away. The Palestinians have limited access to missiles, but they're nearly impossible to aim, meaning that if they want to actually do damage, they basically have to get close enough to be in the blast radius to use an explosive.
As for the concept of a book being the word of God, why on earth would you think Jews don't have that? In fact, they have something that is arguably worse: the belief that God's word is fallible (or at least, human understanding of God's word is fallible), but the rabbis (meaning sanhedrin, not the modern usage, but a lot of modern usage rabbis try to argue that they should be included too) are infallible, and you must obey them.
As for the supposed lives of the characters/prophets: you're talking complete drivel. Moses killed civilians and ordered the deaths of civilians. His nephew's son, Phinehas, murdered a man for having sex with a non-Jewish woman, and God was apparently so pleased, he made Phinehas' descendants the high priests. Joshua, the successor of Moses, led and ordered wars of extermination. He promised his daughter in marriage to whoever could murder an entire city the fastest. The first Israelite king, Saul, was dethroned and murdered with his whole family by God for not exterminating an entire city and sparing the lives of some non-combatants and animals. There are tons more stories like that. So I have literally no clue where you're getting the idea that the lives of the prophets in the Bible aren't violent. You've obviously never read the Bible.
As for the majority of terrorist organizations being Islamic--that entirely depends on your definition of "terrorism". If you only use it to include religious extremist groups containing more than X hundred members, then maybe. But if you use it to describe any group whose intention is to use fear to achieve a goal of controlling, intimidating, silencing, or otherwise destroying people or groups that are in opposition to their stated goals, be they political, financial, etc...then no, it absolutely is not true, the South American drug trade contains a much, much higher number of terrorist groups, and Christian extremist groups that are small cells of insanity inflicting their violence on insiders and their close contacts outnumber Muslim terrorist groups.
Poll
Topic: Pro Israel or Pro Palestine?