Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Yesterday at 11:13 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
Yesterday at 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 13, 2025, 01:15 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 08, 2025, 01:38 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Most idiotic "scientific" comment

 (Read 1877 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Most idiotic "scientific" comment
     OP - July 06, 2011, 12:08 PM

    Some guy named "Wormhole" has been hounding my "Speed of light" video for some time now trying to convince me that I am wrong and the Quran does contain the speed of light.

    I stated that the sum in the video is not an equation because slowing the Moon down by 50% should result in 50% of the speed of light but it doesn't.  He just replied with the following...

    Quote
    "For example slowing the moon down by half should result in half of the speed of light." That's not true. The moon only slows down if ocean friction transfers Earth's rotational kinetic energy to the moon. The moon would recede and Earth day would increase but the ratio Lunar Orbits/ Earth Day remains unchanged.


    He thinks that the rotational momentum of the Earth being transferred to the Moon via tides would slow the Moon down - the fact that the Earth rotates more often than the Moon orbits the Earth has obviously escaped him, and too the fact that this phenomenon has already been cited as the cause for the Moon speeding up AND for the number of hours in an Earth day getting longer over time.

    Wow, what utter ignorance!

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Most idiotic "scientific" comment
     Reply #1 - July 07, 2011, 07:44 PM

    I have started writing the idiotic arguments I hear down.
    Some of them are obviously made up on the spot, and I have often been quite impressed by the creativity.

    There does not seem to be a limit to the idiocy. Every few days i hear the most idiotic thing I have ever heard
  • Re: Most idiotic "scientific" comment
     Reply #2 - July 07, 2011, 09:55 PM

    Nope, it seems this claim is correct.  As the Moon recedes to a greater distance it gains potential energy as it becomes further away from the Earth - this additional potential energy is paid for by kinetic energy of the orbital velocity.  I've learned something new and interesting today.

    Still doesn't change the fact that cosine(90) is zero Smiley

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • Re: Most idiotic "scientific" comment
     Reply #3 - July 07, 2011, 10:19 PM

    Quote
    The moon only slows down if ocean friction transfers Earth's rotational kinetic energy to the moon

    I don't understand what is meant by this.
  • Re: Most idiotic "scientific" comment
     Reply #4 - July 08, 2011, 12:38 AM

    Monsieur, "For example slowing the moon down by half should result in half of the speed of light." That's not true. The moon only slows down if ocean friction transfers Earth's rotational kinetic energy to the moon. The moon would recede and Earth day would increase but the ratio Lunar Orbits/ Earth Day remains unchanged.
    Therefore God exists.
    Reply!

    I'm open for debate (of why we should re-/embrace Islam), but I will no longer participate in this forum. Message me if you need anything. Good luck and may you all find your way... again...
  • Re: Most idiotic "scientific" comment
     Reply #5 - July 08, 2011, 01:10 AM

    luftazure, a veritable contemporary Euler! Who shall be your Diderot?

    قل للمليحة في الخمار الأسود
    مـاذا فـعــلت بــناسـك مـتـعـبد

    قـد كـان شـمّر لــلـصلاة ثـيابه
    حتى خـطرت له بباب المسجد

    ردي عليـه صـلاتـه وصيـامــه
    لا تـقــتـلــيه بـحـق ديــن محمد
  • Re: Most idiotic "scientific" comment
     Reply #6 - July 08, 2011, 11:09 AM

    Monsieur, "For example slowing the moon down by half should result in half of the speed of light." That's not true. The moon only slows down if ocean friction transfers Earth's rotational kinetic energy to the moon. The moon would recede and Earth day would increase but the ratio Lunar Orbits/ Earth Day remains unchanged.
    Therefore God exists.
    Reply!


    In a scenario where there are exactly 4 lunar months in a sidereal year what would the theta angle be between the Moon and Sun at the end of the month as per the miracle claim?

    I don't come here any more due to unfair moderation.
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=30785
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »