but imo there is a key point we might be missing here, and that is the fact we are dealing with young youth. in fact a lot of the rioters are teens and some are even adolescents. they are young youth who have no money, have no prospects, have no part in society - they've been cast aside and forgotten about.
How did all those black, asian, ethnic minority and immigrant victims of the rioters burned out of their homes manage to make something of their lives in the inner city, given that they lived in the same areas of 'neglect', and were not given any handouts and were certainly not born with a silver spoon in their mouths?
I'm not saying that investment and attention should not be paid to these areas. I'm saying the victims of these riots are poor, marginalised, working class, and more often than not, women, men and children from ethnic minorities.
I'm saying that the violent rioters should not be given the status of being primary victims.
. i just think it's a big mistake to ignore the possibilty that recent government spending policies have contributed to the anger we are seeing on our streets.
This government has been in for just over a year. If you're making the structural argument, the eleven years that Labour were in power just about accounts for the age of the youngest of the rioters.