Nice intro, although approached from a angle that is not the same approach ii would take (these anti natalist from a hedonistic perspective which i think fails) whereas Schopenhauer (not a nihilist) approaches it from a better perspective - as the very condition of existence hence satisfaction in hedonism does not exist in the first place
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqOeHYeNezQperspective of so-called scientist Richard dawkins dissected
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vats_PpuI4A&feature=channel_video_title"If children were brought into the world by an act of pure reason alone, would the human race continue to exist? Would not a man rather have so much sympathy with the coming generation as to spare it the burden of existence, or at any rate not take it upon himself to impose that burden upon it in cold blood?"
— Arthur Schopenhauer
what is your view
As for the subject of this thread, here's my stance:
If you're thinking about having a baby, and you know it will it will suffer horribly its whole life, don't concieve. It's digesting to wait to abort it.
I know someday you'll have a beautiful life, I know you'll be a star
In somebody else's sky, but why, why, why
Can't it be, can't it be mine
https://twitter.com/AlharbiMoe