Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Today at 04:00 PM

New Britain
Yesterday at 11:13 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
Yesterday at 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 13, 2025, 01:15 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: The 'Chance' argument : Refuted in 5 easy steps.

 (Read 1661 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • The 'Chance' argument : Refuted in 5 easy steps.
     OP - September 04, 2011, 08:17 PM











  • Re: The 'Chance' argument : Refuted in 5 easy steps.
     Reply #1 - September 04, 2011, 08:35 PM

    Nice way to put it. I remember reading some similer comment on  the video "beating astronomical odds".

    very well put. You should make a blog ad list these all these little arguments there.




    Lost somewhere between immensity and eternity is our tiny planetary home. [carl sagan]
  • Re: The 'Chance' argument : Refuted in 5 easy steps.
     Reply #2 - September 06, 2011, 11:49 AM

    would be better with the actual probabilities.

    even just getting the first card is 1 in 52.
    getting the first and second (whatever they are) is 1 in 52 X 51
    the whole thing is 1 in 52 x 51 x 50 x 49 x 48 x 47 x 46 x 45 x 44..........x 3 x 2

    1 in 80658200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000

    i think the argument is the texas sharpshooter fallacy, where you draw the target around the bullet after you have fired it

    Assigning probabilistic significance to an event already happened (wherever your bullet lands/whatever order the cards are in/however life or the universe i is arranged) is meaningless.

    mundane events with astronomical probabilities happen all day, every day.
  • Re: The 'Chance' argument : Refuted in 5 easy steps.
     Reply #3 - September 06, 2011, 02:57 PM

    Yes. Almost every apologist uses the chance argument as if it is the clincher - a full frontal punch in the nose kind of thing without ever understanding this in the context of biological evolution.

    The Big dna molecule was not built up in one go! To claim it was is false!

    Little Fly, Thy summer's play
    My thoughtless hand has brushed away.

    I too dance and drink, and sing,
    Till some blind hand shall brush my wing.

    Therefore I am a happy fly,
    If I live or if I die.
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »