What forces these people to sell their labor in such an unequitable way, other than their own desperation? In a western democracy, the answer is nothing.
Being desperate for money and material goods isn't good enough for you? The only other way for most people to make basic subsistence would be to live on hand-outs/social services, scam the state for benefits, or steal/engage in other crimes.
Try telling a Bangladeshi woman, who until recently couldn't get a $1 dollar loan to kick start her basket weaving trade, about the paucity of economic choices of western peoples.
This is a straight-up retarded argument-- that Third World labor is obviously exploited worse than labor in developed nations in no way refutes any point I made.
Its not a meritocracy, but its certainly the closest we've gotten in recorded history.
Evidence?
Much of that has had to do with letting those who create value keep the wealth that is the fruit of their efforts.
Um, what? Fact is labor does not get the full value of their work, not even close, and if what you mean is that business owners are allowed to profit makes our society more of a meritocracy, well, you'd need some evidence to convince me of that.
This interim solution is never going to work in a rapidly globalizing economy in which there is a nearly unlimited number of workers who are willing to do more for less and less.
International labor unions? Revolutionary movements taking power in enough developing countries to start shifting the balance?
Well, what's your alternative? Adopt your defeatist attitude that this is the best of all possible worlds and even if it isn't there's not shit we can do about it so we should stop bitching?
Actually it sounds rather absurd that the ownership-working class power dynamic might even be changed, just because we "ask for it".
I never made such a claim.