If you reject Bukhari and muslim .. and hadiths.. then majority of the muslim scholars would deem you an apostate anyways..
I don't care..
well those majority of the Muslim scholars with big beard and pot bellies can call me apostate or any other name., I call them BEARDED BRAINLESS BABOONS
so their really isn't anything left to debate.. because majority of muslims accept them as authentic .. so they believe their prophet was like in bukhari and muslim and other hadith books..
Many of them have not read Quran and 99% so-called Muslims are brains washed by Hadith, They often became Muslims for no fault of theirs.
that's one of the reasons i left islam.. i couldn't accept all the barbaric hadith..
well reject Hadith and Read Quran only....
their is even a verses in the quran that specify worldly punishments for sin.. i don't see how you can deny that fact.. when muslims themselves acknowledge it..
I don't deny the fact there is some rubbish in Quran but those words may have come from OT & NT and on top of it Quran it self was written after the death of Prophet of Islam 20 to 30 years after his death. A careful reading of Quran tells me most of it is from OT, NT and Arabian Pagan stories of that time, So there is some good and some bad in it as you will find in any religious scriptures..
I see you changed the name of the thread as "Muhammad's urine".. Thank you.. would you mind changing it to
Bukhari Bull Shit and Muhammad's Urine.. with best regards
yeezevee