What?
Nothing, just reading between the lines. Maybe things that arern't there.
Anyone willingly disregarding the greater injustices against women - the suppression and oppression of women, the segregation, the dehumanisation, the physical and psychological coercion, and the abuse and violence - from which acts of defiance like this are born is not only doing nobody any favours, but also laying down unnecessary conversational speed bumps.
This personal act of protest is about a wider sense of those injustices. It is you who are over-simplifying this, if anyone, by not making reasonable distinctions between individual acts of nudity and maintaining that they are all equal for the sake of your argument regardless of place, circumstances, social and moral climate, age, etc.
The level in which you mistook my point suggests something else.
It is not a question of her protesting those things, it's why NUDE is a weapon? Nude protests are a global thing. Her cause is not the issue, I'm obviously FOR her cause, but the cause of anything is not the method. We don't defend walking when we march for causes. As an analogy, a similar question would be to ask for an explanation on the origins of marching. And even more interestingly, why thousands marching, often has less effect han a nude protest.