The size zero model is favoured by non gay designers, straight designers, female designers. Its perpetuated by model agencies run by women, and fashion magazines edited by women.
Whilst there is a debate to be had about the size zero image, isolating gay designers as the progenitors of this is an example of bigotry. To suggest that what represents an aesthetic ideal of our era is down simply to the preference of gay designers is simply ridiculous.
I remember reading somewhere that the women who work in the model agancy does have more than it's fair share of female ephebophiles, perhaps it was in a biography of Kate Moss. The operative words being 'fair share'.
So if we go along this fair share, I put it to you that the fashion world has more than its fair share of gay men. What is the number of gays in society, some would say 10%, i'd think it was more nearer 5%, now I would bet that the fashion world has more than 5% working in it, from top to bottom of the chain. They are over-represented. Is it not fair to apportion more blame.
Again I reiterate that other aspects of the media do have more curvier women, women with a better hip-to-waist ratio, women who have boob jobs, women who don't look like tall boys. A lot of these fulfil the visual needs of these men, say Chuck Lorre lol.
Dirty old rich media men are too blame, be they straight or gay. Just that the size zero on the catwalk is in contrast to the boob jobbed honies in the rest of the media. 9Yes I know some straight men prefer a bag of bones, one of my friends does but I am talking generally.
perhaps if I am wrong and it is stick-thin women wanted in front of the camera by straight men then I would guess these type of straight men are looking for women who look like girls. The older some men get......Again it is a combination of dirty old men(staright or gay) and a combination with consumerism/feminism/free society that is to blame for my ultimate nemisis - sexualisation of children.
Allat accused me of being insecure/confused because I come across time to time rattling the cages of the gay lobby on here, wonder what people would have accused me off if I banged on about sexualisation of the young??
To jump the gun about who is responsible for anorexia, found this on the net >>>>>>>>>Girls get anorexia 'because their brains are wired differently'
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-502705/Girls-anorexia-brains-wired-differently.html#ixzz1mP0asVW4Brains wired differently ? Scientist say that about gays and peadophiles.
I have no problem with gay people - I understand why partriarchal society would 'frown' against this practice, cause the line of heritage went through father to son ergo doesn't help society if homosexuals abound, but we don't have that problem anymore. I have friends who are gay, or did have at university - grew right friendly with a lesbian, her sister and female flatmate(both straight - visited quite a few gay asian gay clubs with said company plus their younger sister and boyfriend, admittedly at first, a bit wary but grew more comfortable. met gay asian male couples through them. Never forget the lesbain friend fretting over her dinner table setting asking 'do you think it looks right?' 'do i look alright?' lol being nervous like as if a boy was coming round.
One thing though, as there are two men involved and in general men have higher sex drives than men, does this not mean homosexuals are generally going to be more sexed, there must be some evidence that they have more partners than heterosexuals.
Topic: Isabelle Caro, the face of anorexia, dies at 28