Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Yesterday at 11:13 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
Yesterday at 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 13, 2025, 01:15 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 13, 2025, 01:08 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 08, 2025, 01:38 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
February 06, 2025, 03:13 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
February 03, 2025, 09:25 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: kalam cosmological argument

 (Read 2730 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • kalam cosmological argument
     OP - February 01, 2012, 07:53 PM

    if i m not wrong this is kalam cosmological argument

    1) Everything that begins to exist has a cause
    2) Universe beings to exist
    3) Universe has a cause and that is god

    I argue with them like this

    "Okay I agree that universe begins to exist , but not everything in this universe we observe begins to exist , as we have a law 'energy can neither be created nor destroyed'

    1) why the cause of universe cannot be energy ?
    2) why it has to be a conscious being to be the cause of universe?
    3) why it has to be only one cause and not multiple that can exists in parallel ?


    are my arguments right ?

    Disbelief doesn't justify getting tortured in eternal hell
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #1 - February 02, 2012, 01:07 AM

    Here you go something very good I found recently:

    http://angramainyusblog.blogspot.com/2012/01/kalam-cosmological-argument-once-again.html

  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #2 - February 02, 2012, 01:31 AM

    if i m not wrong this is kalam cosmological argument

    1) Everything that begins to exist has a cause
    2) Universe beings to exist
    3) Universe has a cause and that is god

    I argue with them like this

    "Okay I agree that universe begins to exist , but not everything in this universe we observe begins to exist , as we have a law 'energy can neither be created nor destroyed'

    1) why the cause of universe cannot be energy ?
    2) why it has to be a conscious being to be the cause of universe?
    3) why it has to be only one cause and not multiple that can exists in parallel ?


    are my arguments right ?




    The origins of Kalam/Discussions/discourses/debates is nothing to do with Islam/Quran/Hadith  that was allegedly started or alleged words of Muhammad. This Kalam started   at least 100 years after the death of Muhammad. It is nothing to do with Islam.  In fact Muslim folks with common sense started it Inspite of Islam not due to Islam.

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #3 - February 02, 2012, 11:02 AM

    @ yeezeve:

    Do you have that book in PDF format?

  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #4 - February 02, 2012, 11:13 AM

    @ yeezeve:

    Do you have that book in PDF format?

    you seem to read lots of stuff dear sturmgewehr.

    down load it from here..

    with best wishes
    yeezevee

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #5 - February 02, 2012, 12:23 PM

    @ yeezeve:

    You are the man and you know it Smiley

    Thanks a lot Smiley

  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #6 - February 02, 2012, 12:51 PM

    ............

    Thanks  .................

     This thread is discussing a very important subject that is often neglected to discuss and  tell the truth to the world dear sturmgewehr.    Very few know  about  this subject including those intellectual Muslims. The point is  it is very important for Muslims, Non-Muslims, Zebras, Dogs, cats and baboons  with beards   learn about the subjects like origins of Kalam in Islam or   Gold - Golden times-Golden Science of early Islam  after the Caliphs the son in-laws and father in-laws of Muhammad... The in-breeding  heroes of Islam  get killed.

     Muslim intellectuals consider Quran is from  Kalam of Allah, that means Allah penned the Quran. But with reference to Abrahamic  religions the origins of Kalam is actually from Judaism.  Off course  by default  our Muslim Intellectuals  making Abraham, Moses, Jesus as Prophets of Islam, they consider "Kalam" is from Quran/Muhammad/Islam.  That is so funny to think,    not only Muslims/Islam   usurped philosophical thoughts of other religions, (they still doing it) but also  they took over  THE REAL ESTATE such as Mosques in Jerusalem.   Muslims/Islam  considering Islam as Abraham religion by default,  they can take over/convert  All Judea-Christian lands in to Islamic nations and their churches/Jewish temples  in to Mosques. Islam is a total package  to take over books , men, women and property in the name of Allah for the sake of Allah.. lol.. Cheesy    

     Usurping  good stuff and philosophical thoughts of other religions is OK, but when you start aiming at women and real estate of other religious folks and you do that in the name of Allah/God then wars/problems human genocides sets in ., well that is real life.,  Any ways going back to Kalam, let me add few links here from Islamic perspective.

    The Classical Islamic Arguments for the Existence of God by Majid Fakhry

    Tawhid: Kalam cosmological argument, Early Islamic philosophy

    Time in Islamic Kalam

    well that is enough to start with ...
     

    Do not let silence become your legacy.. Question everything   
    I renounced my faith to become a kafir, 
    the beloved betrayed me and turned in to  a Muslim
     
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #7 - February 02, 2012, 11:42 PM

    ^^

    Are those Pro KCA or Against the Kalam Argument? I don't think I am willing to read another pro KCA paper, the KCA is flawed anyways.

  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #8 - February 04, 2012, 06:44 PM

    demise one is factually incorrect. People really need to learn about quantum mechanics.
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #9 - February 06, 2012, 09:40 PM

    Quote
    demise one is factually incorrect. People really need to learn about quantum mechanics.


    not everyone can do that eh ?..... and I assume you are talking about Virtual particals ?




    Lost somewhere between immensity and eternity is our tiny planetary home. [carl sagan]
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #10 - February 07, 2012, 12:46 AM

    I am no physicist, but from my own layman research I gathered there are so-called "stochastic" (random) processes in quantum physics. Radioactive decay, for example; it's impossible to predict when a particular atom will decay. Whether or not such processes constitute enough support for the notion of 'uncaused events' is debatable though, I think.

    Have you heard the good news? There is no God!
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #11 - February 12, 2012, 09:41 PM

    It doesnt matter because the conclusion is inherently faulty.
    It's just a cosmological 'god of the gaps' argument. Nothing more, nothing less

    The foundation of superstition is ignorance, the
    superstructure is faith and the dome is a vain hope. Superstition
    is the child of ignorance and the mother of misery.
    -Robert G. Ingersoll (1898)

     "Do time ninjas have this ability?" "Yeah. Only they stay silent and aren't douchebags."  -Ibl
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #12 - February 12, 2012, 09:57 PM

    It doesn't matter because the initial premise is flawed, before you even get anywhere near the conclusion.

    "1) Everything that begins to exist has a cause"

    There is no possible way that you can definitively prove that this will be true in all possible cases. It's an attempt to extrapolate our everyday notions of cause and effect far outside of the realms in which we can prove they apply.

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #13 - February 12, 2012, 10:03 PM

    You are correct.

    The universe has a cause (this does not imply said cause was space ghost....but anyway), that is largely accepted.
    However, that everything has a cause is not, especially given that "everything" includes things outside of this universe.

    The foundation of superstition is ignorance, the
    superstructure is faith and the dome is a vain hope. Superstition
    is the child of ignorance and the mother of misery.
    -Robert G. Ingersoll (1898)

     "Do time ninjas have this ability?" "Yeah. Only they stay silent and aren't douchebags."  -Ibl
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #14 - February 12, 2012, 10:33 PM

    anyway,
    I prefer the Kazam cosmological argument instead


    and that cause was a Shaq Attack!




    why not, makes as much sense

    The foundation of superstition is ignorance, the
    superstructure is faith and the dome is a vain hope. Superstition
    is the child of ignorance and the mother of misery.
    -Robert G. Ingersoll (1898)

     "Do time ninjas have this ability?" "Yeah. Only they stay silent and aren't douchebags."  -Ibl
  • Re: kalam cosmological argument
     Reply #15 - March 25, 2012, 03:09 PM

    this is interesting Smiley

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o9DLcTfYBcQ&feature=player_embedded

  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »