Yasir Qadhi, a popular conservative cleric and dean of academic affairs at Houston-based AlMaghrib Institute, holds the latter view. A lecture on progressives that he has given at Islamic conferences has garnered thousands of views on YouTube.
"The very fact that the movement is so small or marginal speaks volumes about their sway and influence," says Qadhi, who lives in Memphis, Tenn., and whose institute trains 6,000 students annually. "It's pretty clear the mainstream of Muslims of North America, who are under no pressure or threat of physical violence, have clearly identified with traditional voices."
"'Let's look at the text of the Quran and see what Allah and his messenger want us to do rather than to project our ideas onto the text," Qadhi says. "We traditionalists firmly believe the Quran is the book of Allah and the speech of Allah."
Dalia Mogahed, director of the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies, also takes a critical view of the progressives.
Muslims for Progressive Values "are little more than a footnote or a special interest," she writes in an email. "Their actual influence in the [Muslim American] community is virtually non-existent," adds Mogahed, who spent six years collecting 50,000 interviews for the book "Who Speaks For Islam? What a Billion Muslims Really Think."
So, how do they overcome this ^^^
Judaism survived as a living faith precisely because it allowed Liberal and Reform schools to formally breathe away from the Orthodox. That is, Judaism allowed that liberal space to be institutionalised, and allowed a plurality of interpretations to co-exist, even if they disagree, they are still 'Jewish'
It seems to me that this is a kind of impulse towards a formal space for Reform Islam. The problem is that this is viewed as bidah, innovation, and deviant. And that is almost the worst thing that you can be, according to orthodoxies.