Well I didn't want to get into a theological discussion here. That is outside the scope of this thread. The Qu'ran is not a book of science, however, the science it does contain is accurate and in some cases, miraculous. If you don't see that or refuse to believe that, then that is your choice. It's the same for me feeling that evolution as described by mainstream science is not accurate.
You contradict yourself, you claim to follow a logical faith yet time and, time again you make logically flawed comments. You say that Qu'ran is not a book of science, and then in the same breath contradict that statement by saying, that the science it does contain is accurate, and then you make a comment which is so absurd by saying miraculous science, science does not deal with the supernatural, miraculous is a different field to science they are not even compatible. I refuse to believe something which is scientifically inaccurate.
So evolution by mainstream science isn't accurate? Would you care to point out which body of evidence you can falsify to show that your statement is true? When I said the Qu'ran is scientifically inaccurate, I showed an example, you on the other hand are just making claims without even baking them up, when you make a positive claim the onus is on you to proof that claim.
Also saying that discussion is outside the scope of this thread is at most silly and at worst disingenuous.