It wasn't just Jews, it a core concept of Christianity. Two of those verses are from the Gospels. This lays to rest the idea that bloodlines were important in both religions. The Bloodline is part of the prophecies Jesus uses to validate his claims of being the messiah
Yes I know the bloodlines are needed as a requirement for the Messiah.
Then religion has no practical use or purpose. Any purpose or way of life a person can discover using their own intelligence and conscience. If I can life a good life without Jesus I have no need to pay lip service to religion. Also I can easily shift from a theist concept to a deist one that everything important is already part of human natural. If we can devise our own morality then direct intervention of a God is not required.
Religion is humanity's attempt to reach God. Christianity is God's attempt to reach down to humanity. That is why there are various religions in the world. Yes you can live a good life without religion.
Yes one can live a good life without believing in God.
The purpose of Christianity is to bring reconciliation between God and humanity through Jesus.
Your statement contradicts the numerous laws passed directly to various prophets and even Jesus's own words. It also highlights flawed thinking as morality has never been agreed upon by humanity wholesale. What was morale centuries ago is not now. Also numerous laws and morales God set out in the OT have been dismissed as archaic in the modern world. Why communicate laws and morales that only apply in a short time frame. Why not pass on concepts that would hold for all time rather than for Moses' Judaism only.
Gee I don't remember Jesus giving us laws. Which laws of the prophets are you referring to?
Morality has never been agreed upon by humanity as a wholesale? If I say murder is wrong will you agree or disagree with me?
Which numerous laws and morales God set out in the OT are archaic?
Bogard there is a reason why the OT is referred to as the old covenant.
How do you explain different views of morality held by different cultures. Are your views held the only one correct? Are the other views in error? Is your own view wrong? Does humanity only agree over certain morales such as murder but not other views such as marriage
Give me an example.
Hypothetical situation. In the future overpopulation is a threat to our species and planet. Is it morally right to enforce population control in order to avoid global famine or support freedom of choice? My own view is the greater good overrides all person choice in this situation. Is my view morale? Are the views of freedom of choice morale? The point of this situation is to show that morales become shades of grey rather than the black and white views proposed by religions.
It is not morally right to enforce population control because it will give the government control over our bodies and take away our freedom. There are ways to avoid disaster without the government taking control of our lives.
By the way I don't believe in the overpopulation myth.
Why ask for Christian beliefs and concepts that pre-date Christ if you are familiar with said concepts? Your answer doesn't make sense in light of the question in the first place.
Because I am trying to figure out what you are trying to prove.