Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Do humans have needed kno...
Today at 03:50 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
February 23, 2025, 09:40 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
February 22, 2025, 09:50 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
February 22, 2025, 02:56 PM

German nationalist party ...
February 21, 2025, 10:31 AM

New Britain
February 17, 2025, 11:51 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
February 14, 2025, 08:00 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
February 13, 2025, 10:07 PM

Muslim grooming gangs sti...
February 13, 2025, 08:20 PM

Russia invades Ukraine
February 13, 2025, 11:01 AM

Islam and Science Fiction
February 11, 2025, 11:57 PM

Gaza assault
February 05, 2025, 10:04 AM

Theme Changer

 Topic: An early pioneer of Islamic excuse making

 (Read 1256 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • An early pioneer of Islamic excuse making
     OP - October 14, 2013, 07:09 PM

    Why the quran sucks in parts, and why it sounds just like an Arab guy talking

    Quote
    Whilst agreeing that the Qur'an expresses the highest forms of rhetoric they differ
    as to whether it is uniformly eloguent. Thus, would there exist verbal structures
    more suitable and symmetrical for the transmission of some given meaning?
    The Judge disagrees, and maintains that each of its words represents the apex
    of meaning, even though some may be more perceptive of this than others. Abu
    Nasr 'l-Qushairi prefers the view that it does indeed vary. He thus says: "We
    make no clairms that everything in the Qur'an is of the purest eloquence. Others
    have also said the Qur'an comprises of material that is both eloquent as well as
    most eloquent. The scholar "\tl 'l-Din b. 'Abd 'l-Salarm has inclined to his view,
    and posed this question: "Why is the Qur'an not most eloquent in its entirety?
    The master, Mauhub 'l-Jazari furnished a reply which in essence states that the
    Qur'an, structured in this way, would have contradicted the conventional speech
    patterns of the Arabs which combines both eloquent and most eloquent
    discourse. The challenge as such would have remained incomplete. Thus, it
    followed their speech patterns so that their inability to rmeet its challenge could be
    manifest. And this then precluded them from countering: "You produce that over
    which we essentially lack ability! This is tantamount to a seeing person saying to
    the blind: I have overcome you by way of my sight. The blind one will simply
    respond: "Your victory would be complete only if I too was able to see, and your
    sight was stronger than mine! But seeing that I am totally deprived of sight, how
    is it possible to take up the challenge! [/quote}

  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »