Frank Herbert's Dune NOT Kevin Herbert's, please
Reply #37 - October 18, 2013, 01:48 AM
Not at 2:45 am. You'll have to make do with some thoughts I made earlier...
[Frank Herbert] evokes a sense of place and 'elsewhere' in such lifelike beauty. You are living and breathing the air of his universe, hearing the sounds, smelling the aromas. He doesn't waste time with lengthy exposition. He just opens the door into another land, complete with foreign words and concepts that might not become clear until much later. This puts some readers off. Some readers like to know the background information, like to have jargon explained as soon as its introduced; What the hell is a Kwizatz Haderach? Who the hell are the Bene Gesserit? But his exposition comes organically, through action, drama, dialogue of the characters as they talk off-hand, as though you're eavesdropping on a completely alien world and catching a glimpse of daily life there. I like that. It teases and tantalises me rather than spoon feeds me. Treats me like an adult rather than a child.
Fantasy authors tend to meander and get bogged down with the exposition when conveying a story. Contemporary writers tend to indulge in themselves and too much. But writers like Smith and Herbert write like a movie edit. Lean and mean. Only scenes that add something essential to the story threads. Just enough to give solid details, to spur the imagination, and plenty of room for the reader to fill in with their own colour and creativity.
Too fucking busy, and vice versa.