Going with the assumption that you’ve never conversed with him before, once you’ve learned Arabic, what criteria will you be using to determine if the author of the Qur’an is indeed God?
Good question, and the truth is I don't know. I'd probably see first if it lives up to its reputation and completely demolishes anything written by Homer, Shakespeare, et al. and work from there I suppose.
I'm hoping some of those will help you out.
Will check them all out, thank you! Shout out to kutta for the links he provided by PM too
you were probably presented with Hamza Tzortzis's linguistic miracle.
I'm aware of Tzortzi's shenanigans. His advocacy of Quranic science fell flat on its face which doesn't really do wonders for his credibility, but I didn't want to dismiss his 'linguistic miracle' claims on those grounds alone. A broken clock is still right twice a day (not that I'm saying the man
has to be right about something).
Is a thorough rebuttal to his claims in the works or is it
really not worth the trouble as far as anyone is concerned?
Hey wait a minute... Wasn't the Quran an oral tradition before it was codified. Opps
The rebuttal I've heard to this is that supposedly a lot of people had committed the verses to memory before it was written down, and that the amount of consensus between those people removed all reasonable doubt. Again, no idea how true this is, which is lazy on my part.
Both pharoah as well as the embryology miracle is deeply flawed than the rest of the miracles.
...
Their news also show fake conversion of celebrities to islam such as in the case of cristiano ronaldo and messi .
I've heard of Tzortzi's antics with his embryology paper which got demolished by the skeptics. And the follow-up article where he basically denounces the 'scientific miracles', but somehow clings to the idea of 'reconciling the Quran with nature', ergo not full of contemporary pseudoscience and outright bullshit (not sure if he was being sincere or a textbook case of damage control).
I haven't really looked into the pharoah miracle. I read that it has its roots in Bucaille's book, which is pretty telling. There's an article debunking it on answering-islam.org, but I'm a little dubious about their methods since they lie on the same end of the fundie spectrum.
I'm aware of the fake celebrity conversions - sometimes on youtube I see such videos popping up in the sidebar with some sensationalist, caps-locked title such as "RONALDO CONVERTS TO ISLAM".
One religion cancelling out the other and vice versa . Its like combining both acid and base and the result is a neutral simple water .
Something about it reminds me of Schrodinger's cat. Both could be wrong, but at the very most, only one of them can be right.
What does everybody make of the Sana'a manuscripts? On the one hand, I've heard it completely demolishes the claim that the Quran has remained unchanged since its conception, and on the other it only shows some insignificant variations in spelling.