^ Oh, sorry. I must have read you wrong.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/333e4/333e449a6106d47fff617e3998cf382ca795a628" alt="wacko"
I guess we will have to...it's really frustrating to have to talk about this as though Islam were true? But if I
had to assume it were true and that the Quran were true, and I knew here were the remnants of a game of telephone that had these gross scientific errors and inaccuracies and, not to mention, some deplorable stuff that contradicts other hadith and contradicts the Quran, I'd find it, personally, to be the
only option. I could not in good conscience say, "Yeah, stone that guy to death, Mohammed thought it was a good idea...but the one about him drinking urine,
meh. His mistake/false hadith. The other one, though...totally cool. Definitely fine." I accept that this is just an opinion, though.
Nowadays, I'm definitely of the perspective that the hadith accurately represent how Islam was kind of designed to be by the man himself, but when you're actually a believing Muslim in this position, that's neither here nor there. You recognize you've got to rule out the impossible and accept the improbable, that the perception of Islam has got to evolve or die.
Also, I don't know, serpentofeden isn't the first to say that to me in this thread, I think he (she?) is just making a point...and totally valid. I get it. You should get rid of both, not just one, if you're going to claim to be intellectually honest and logical.
I'm so glad I don't really have to worry about this stuff anymore.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/54797/547971f3fae7a432d33d2ded6ca6528a5ed13186" alt="Grin"