.
Sure I'll have a browse around. I'm eying that philosophy section =). I want to look at that arabic section, but it seems to use informal arabic and I really only have (very limited) knowledge of classic arabic. I'll probably need help traversing it.
Oh and I'm answering you separately because you asked so much!
I used the term Muslim because that's really the only appropriate term to use for a Muslim, and all the internal labeling I see amongst Muslims I find problematic because its so divisive and not based on Islam anyways. I think people ran out of things to disagree on they would simply make something up just so they could disagree some more =/.
So for your questions:
I believe the universe has a Creator, as opposed to there being nothing or an eternal universe. I don't presume much else except that the traits mentioned in the Qur'an like 'Al-Jabbar,,' 'As-Salaam,' or 'Al Moomin.' That's really it, because I can't really perceive anything beyond that (limitation of human beings and whatnot!)
I believe in free-will in the sense that human beings make choices within that which they control, and they do not within that which they do not control. So they control their decision to stab someone, but they don't control the color of their eyes when they are born or the attribute of burning that exists in fire.
I'm not sure what is meant by predestination here, because I think the term means different things to different people. Lots of semantics you know? So perhaps you could elaborate. Or maybe it was similar to the free-will question?
I accept micro-evolution (adaptation), but I reject macro-evolution (special change by category). However, for me this topic has nothing to do with Islam, rather it is my view based on a look at the scientific and logical evidences on the topic. In other words, I would hold this view whether I was a Buddhist, Atheist, Communist, Muslim, etc. Well maybe not if I was Buddhist, cause lots of stuff changes from a epistemological perspective with them. I have some family members who are in this sort of field so I've ended up having lots of conversations in the topic. Sometimes it makes my head spin =S.
Yes I believe in hellfire, but as this is the 'unseen' I believe in this by rational thinking and not by way of empiricism or pure logic.
As for Ahadith, that depends. It is a chain of narration, so it depends on the level of strength. For example, if one person tells me of an event that happened at my work I'll listen but take it with a grain of salt. But if its on every news outlet in the world and no one is disagreeing with it, then I will accept it. Ahadith are the same way. I accept 'mutawatir' ahadith, and am cautious with 'ahad' ahadith. Its really case-by-case =).
I believe in the Qur'an, but as for literal and interpretation, again like ahadith it depends. Some things are very clear and there is no interpretation involved (like the prohibition on usury). Others require investigation, and even after investigation might leave room for doubt. This gets into the nitty-gritty because there are a lot of rules in 'sarf (morphology) and nahw (grammar) so it depends on the verse.
As for science, science is a fantastic field, but its sort of goes into its own bucket. Science is a science, which mean it is built upon other premises from philosophy. A fantastic tool to learn about reality, but the scope is decided by the one wielding the tool as opposed the tool itself. Does that make sense?
Angels and jinn is like the answer to hellfire. Interestingly enough I know a fair amount of atheists who seem to believe in what they say are 'spirits' or a 'higher' energy. Of course this sounds rather odd to me because they are for the most part pure empiricists so I'm not sure how they justify that. Perhaps influence from eastern philosophies? Allahu Alam.
Sooooooo... do I have a label yet? =P.
Cheers!
Topic: Re-introduction