Let us go back to Mecca. My comment about Ibn al-Zubayr is by no mean controversial .
Ask Sean Anthony, Daniel Beck, Ian D. Morris, Emran El-Badawi, on Twitter if they think that Zubayr have founded "Mecca"! Thanks to copy they respond here. I think I've forgotten someone... Ah yes! the great and formidable scholar May Shaddel ! Yes May, Ar Raqim is Petra. Petra was known by the Quranic authors of course...
If they say yes, they have to abandon all the narrative. Because it does not fit, as "Mecca" is the place of the "prophet", etc. Nor elsewhere >>> all the history have to be reconstructed.
Zubayr (660-692) is anti caliph after "Kerbala", not before. So 680, not 660.
Unlike Dan Gibson, we don’t see Petra as birthplace of Islam (he locates there Ka‘ba, Zamzam, Bakka etc. without any topo-paleographic argument)
Yes.
The link of Petra with the primo-Islam only is Al-Zubayr. In their disarray after waiving Jerusalem as qibla and after ‘Ali’s murder, his supporters must have turned to his capital for praying. And that’s all!
No.
All these data clearly suggest that Mecca was founded later than 660 (as a place of pilgrimage); when precisely?
That is the question.
Several revisionist scholars argue that Mecca was founded by Ibn al-Zubayr in ca. 670 to counter Mu3awiya.but he managed to at least mention two: Ohlig and Crone
Crone? Source?
so he should be to Altara's liking.
I like or dislike nobody.
John of Fenek (more commonly known as John bar Penkāyē) describes the site as “Abrahamic”
Source?
Anastasius of Sinai notes the occurrence of sacrifices there
Not located by Anastasius .
These scholars whom I relied upon all agree with Altara that Mecca did not exist and none of them follow the traditional narrative.
Are you sure that I agree with them dear Mahgraye? Really? If yes, you misread me.