Islam, Terrorism, Nazism and Blasphemy

OP - September 12, 2015, 08:29 AM

Islam, Terrorism, Nazism and Blasphemy

Just a while ago, a friend of mine started a debate which eventually proceeded to mild skirmish as I pointed out a scientific error in Quran and calling it a medieval medical fallacy (Talking about 86:6-7 where Quran states that Allah created man from a drop emitted from backbone and ribs). That friend of little stature went frenzy and attacked me with every little brute force he got and was easily turned down as I outmatched him at ease. I grasp him in a tight embrace in my open arms so he can’t throw any more punch at me. There I could actually feel his heartbeat and the hatred it raised with every pulse. After a brief struggle he got exhausted and I let go with laughter. He was not a practicing muslim rather a moderate one. And ironically he is a vet himself. He knows it all. He knows sperm comes from testes not from backbone and ribs. But he got infuriated while pointed at that lies.

Islam claimed to be a religion of peace and a complete code of life. But it consciously evade every inquiry (where possible it forcibly subdue it) to justify that claim. Sometime I wonder how a religion can be so peaceful when there is relentlessly at least one fratricidal war going on within its population solely on the basis of it’s religious dogma? How come this religion of peace has the maximum number of dogmatic religious terrorist organizations operating as an implication of its peaceful doctrine? When asked about the atrocities of Taliban, Al-Kaidah, ISIS, Hamas, Hizbullah, Lashker-e-Tayebah, Harkatul Zihad, Ansarullah Bangla, etc the so called moderate Muslims (who appears to be the angel of peace) so abruptly and authentically accuse them of being the divergent who doesn’t represent the true Islam. But on the contrary I think after centuries of crimes against humanity, Islam needs to learn of taking some responsibilities of its deeds. If they are a misrepresentation of Islam then who are the authentic Muslims?
Some Muslims would drag that casuistry even further claiming Quran and Hadith are the authentic source of Islam and those following it are the Authentic Muslim. But is there any authentic version of that holly book of lies? We can only depend on the Ottoman version of Quran compiled by Kaliph Othman which is barely complying with the original Qurayish version (You can actually check out my claim by comparing the recently discovered copy of the oldest Quran with today’s Quran). Again there is no authentic interpretation of Quran that can be unanimously declared as the acceptable one. Understandably so, as no language can ever be 100% accurately translated into another language. But there’s supposed to be an authentic translation to which maximum scholar accede, like we can find in case of Bible or other scriptures. And talking about hadith (which is supposedly the most authentic explanation of Quran) is a complete disaster. There are hundreds of hadiths that directly contradicts with science & history and most of them are quite so often dismissed by the Muslims themselves as non authentic weak statement of corrupted or oblivious narrators. I get astonished by the effrontery of today’s Muslim scholars in denying the claims of those men who actually been there during Mohammed’s lifetime to carefully memories his messages and pass them flawlessly to their legatees. But still a good sign as Islam has started to reform its fallacies to some extent where it can appear compatible to science. But certainly it can’t make it more acceptable than before.

Islam has a close semblance with Nazism, a good reason why Hitler endorses it as an acceptable one. I understand a religion can’t be compared with a political ideology or propaganda like Nazism, but if you replace Mohammed with the name Hitler you will barely find any difference. Both are anti-Semitic and full of hatred to their opposition. Either it’s Islam or Nazism there is no space for opposition. Just like Hitler, Mohammed issued assassination and execution for his criticism. Asma bint Marwan and Abu Afak, are two conspicuous examples out of many whose are actually assassinated by the order of Mohammed for their sarcastic poetries.
A normal man when challenged with truth would go ahead and accept it and that is the best thing to do if you consider yourself a sane human. But in case of insanities like Nazism/Islam if a truth appears on it’s contrary it needs to be subdued. It explain why my vet friend got infuriated at the semen related fallacy of Quran when so verily stated front of him within quotation, despite having a decent knowledge on reproductive physiology and the location of corresponding reproductive organs. Because Nazism and Islam are the doctrine that is according to its followers can’t be challenged with a contradicting truth. Either of these doctrines pile upon the feeble basement of lies and truth can strike right on that base to pulverize that edifice. So they don’t face truth, as we all know lies can never face truth otherwise it will demolish forever. Instead they subdue it with force. The exact thing my friend tried to do.

However I effectively discovered a basic difference between Nazism and Islam of which I am so proud of and narcissistically consider myself a contender of Nobel Prize. While comparing the founders I was astonished to find Hitler as a monogamous, comparing to his amorous medieval counterpart Mohammed, who was by definition a polygamous sexual pervert, a lecher and a pedophile. Otherwise Islam is absolutely identical to Nazism and quite impossible to differ regardless to their ethnic origin. Just like Hitler Mohammed started his career as an evangelist who quickly rise on top of the rank after migrating to Madina, and shifted to be a plunder as he used to loot trespassing Qurayish merchants around the Arab suburbs and deserts. Just like Hitler brigandage the Rich Stark and stripped off all of his opposing political parties from the parliamentary membership. Then they both proceed to imperialism where they undermine the scheme to conquest their surrounding states/tribes and assimilate them under one massive empire. They both invariably killed Jews but Islam was slightly more lenient on this case. For example I would mention the Banu Quryzah massacre where victorious Muslims killed all of the capitulated male prisoners of war above puberty with one swift blow of sword rather than a slow agonizing death in gas chamber. They enslaved the remaining women and children and made them their sex/house slave, just like Nazis imposed forced labor on their captives in various deathcamps/laborcamps.

Alongside subduing the oppositions and decimating criticism, either of these doctrines demands vindication of their supremacy even from their non followers. They both are guilty of lame conceit of holding superior position on earth. Just like Nazism which considered Germans as the best race, Islam narcissistically claims to be the best nation evolved to rule the earth. They proclaim to be the intercessors of all human being. Their narcissism requires cajolery to be satisfied, so they demand respect without being ready to provide it.
I can’t understand how Muslims demands the right to freely preach their fallacies in Europe after knowing the fact that their prophet Mohammed forcibly evicted Christians, Jews and Pagans just for holding different belief after his supreme victory in Mecca and Medina despite being the righteous inhabitants of those cities by pedigree. And still up to this very day these cities are concealed to all non believers. Muslims will never allow preaching of any other religion in their land but will demand full constitutional right to preach Islam in Christian territory. What else can be so capricious, if you can find? Alongside eviction, Muslims would impose heavy taxation upon non-Muslims in their conquered land, a good source of their income after banditry, so as to render the non-Muslims safe from Islami attacks in their own homeland! Still would they demand tax lifting from the property of mosque?
Islam is like a tumor. It renders no good other than destruction of parenchyma, but it will consume nutrients at an increasing rate and multiply. It will multiply and multiply until every natural resource is consumed and anarchy breaks out. Then it will propagate to another country. The exact thing happened in my country of birth.
If you compare missionary and Sufi version of preaching Christianity/Islam, you will find a massive similarity. The pattern is quite similar if you have a good sense of analogy. First a bunch of peaceful harbinger will approach with the message of love and peace. Soon they will alter the objective to their mission which was so far being the charity, into mockery of the preexisting religion of the local inhabitants. As like as Christianity/Islam preexisting local religions was just another form of lies that can’t withstand criticism. As a result locals would get infuriated and persecute the peaceful preachers. And here comes the Muslim Kaliph/Christian Emperor with his massive military might to aid those persecuted preachers and to exempt them out of their miseries. Local would gather around whatever they can afford to defend their sovereignty but easily get crushed beneath the invading military might. After a brief war the defeated would be captured and threatened death or heavy taxation else they renounce their own faith and accept Islam/Christianity instead. In order to preach these religions primarily required to destroy the local culture and heritage to create a vacuum so that they can shove their own culture to fill in that gap. Even today you can find the same scheme in progress at Syria and Iraq where ISIS destroying historical heritages like age old temples and churches, so they can lay foundation of their mosque in that vacant space. It’s a cultural cleansing to be exact, as according to Irina Bokova, The director general of UNESCO.
Not just the cultural heritage, the language, music, dressings, history and literatures of the conquered tribe would be erased and then replaced by the Arabic version. Here I would emphasize a fact that all Music is absurdly prohibited in Islam. How bad a music can be? What else can sooth your tired ears after a long hard day? Well. For me it seems to be the aliment of soul. Just the very way we need to eat and drink to maintain our health, soul needs music to be in sanguinity. Every culture has its own music that is implicate their thoughts and values. Their loves for their woman, their joys, their sorrows, their sufferings, their every day struggle and hunting skills, all are indented on music. But Islam banns the whole things right away! ”No music” they say. However drum beating might be allowed for a limited extent. And the reason behind this embargo is as absurd as it sounds like. The cause Mohammed presented on banning music actually astonished me at my childhood! According to him Music is a celestial stuff so it should better be enjoyed in heaven rather than earth. What an insane reasoning! There are whole lots of other stuffs that are available in both heaven and earth. Again they aren’t banned in Islam. For example, women. 72 celestial whores are available in heaven but still their supplementary women are available in earth as well. And Mohammed was quite well known for his taste of women. Why not women are banned for men in this temporal life? Why not water, milk, honey, isn’t banned for being the celestial stuffs? Some Muslim apologist wanted to make it rational by declaring Music as an addictive and time consuming phenomenon. But I don’t understand what the hell is wrong with music addiction? How such an important part of our culture can be considered as a waste of time. Those things don’t really fit with sanity. He banned every other music except drum beating. Isn’t drum beating is addictive too? He actually allowed his own culture and music to flourish but banned all the remaining. It represents the extreme narcissistic instinct of Islam and it’s underlining bigotry.

Talking about Islam another thing quiet inevitably comes into way that often left me agape. As I was raised in a fanatic Muslim family, I was often told the Islam is a complete code of life. You can find all necessary instructions ranging from nail trimming to bureaucracy, purging in toilet to foreign policy, all in one singular form. How the hell a faith can be the solution of all the problem? Sounds like Aristotle in medieval era. At that time the knowledge was intentionally confined within Aristotle so as to facilitate ignorance to thrive since ignorance was most likely to bread masochism which will easily submit to dominance.

Besides Quran is so insolently claims to be 100% accurate and without any suspicion, despite having hundreds of scientific, mathematical, historic, grammatical and self contradicting errors that would require hours to mention. A vigorous display of totalitarianism like this are actually born and planned to fail the entire concept. Like every other absolutism it’s primary objective is to gain absolute control over people by confident manipulation, and every free thinkers ought to stand against it. There are varying degree to make a stand, for example the Peshmerga women who are currently fighting against the rapacious ISIS as we speak. But fighting and bloodshed are not always preferable. Muslims are the primary victims of Islam and they are needed to be helped, not to be killed unless it is really necessary as an act of self-defense. The best way to eradicate Islam is to exempt Muslims from it’s grip by patient reasoning. Killing or applying military might is just trimming Islam, but debating is actually uprooting it once and for all. And as I mentioned earlier, diabolic fallacy like Islam never had the gut to accept truth and criticism. That is why it implies Blasphemy laws when being confronted and criticized. Some Muslims tries to justify it as the proper punitive measure for denying an axiom truth! I can’t understand how a universal truth would require punishments like that to be established. People accept truth, just because it is true. It doesn’t need to be shoved in their throat. For example there are many peoples who don’t believe in evolution rather criticizing it. Have you ever seen a single man being slain for it? Of course not. Did it prevent the establishment of evolution as one of the basic branch of biological science? Of course not. You need punitive measures to establish lies, not truth. Truth is established by it’s own virtue. If Islam was more axiom than evolution (which Islam so forcibly refuses), then it wouldn’t require Blasphemy at all.

God didn't created us in his Image. We created God as our own reflection.