Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Today at 01:32 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
Today at 09:01 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Today at 08:53 AM

New Britain
Yesterday at 08:17 AM

Gaza assault
by zeca
November 27, 2024, 07:13 PM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
November 24, 2024, 06:05 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 22, 2024, 06:45 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
November 19, 2024, 11:36 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: What's your argument?

 (Read 1767 times)
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • What's your argument?
     OP - December 11, 2015, 11:19 PM

    As I discuss some of the uncomfortable topics of Islam with my Muslim friends and relatives, they come up with some of the arguments that I'm sure everyone has heard at one point in time.

    The purpose of this thread is to capture not just what arguments they make, but what your counter argument to that is. Is it reasonable? Why do you think their argument is bad?

    E.g. Today I was talking to a good Shia Muslim friend and when confronted that one of us is going to hell to be lashed with whips of fire for eternity would you be happy about that? He said that "don't go so deep. We cannot understand the intricacies of the texts. Translations can misguide us until we understand the whole of it as a scholar"

    I don't think that argument is reasonable but I don't have a better counter argument. Maybe I do but I wanna hear from you guys.

    1. What is it that you think is wrong with Islam?
    2. What is the argument for that you get from Muslims?
    3. What's your counter argument to that?

    To keep it simple, let's do one issue Per post.

    The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those that cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. - Alvin Toffler
  • What's your argument?
     Reply #1 - December 11, 2015, 11:25 PM

    A while ago a muslim member asked for our five strongest arguments against the quran. This was my reply.

    So I thought I'd expand on the above, because I honestly meant these to be arguments.

    1) The quran:

    The quran claims itself to be the perfect uncorrupted word of god. That's it's biggest flaw. It invites challenge in a way other holy texts don't, and is really to arrogant for it's own good. The level is enough that it doesn't have the flexibility needed to stand the test of time. The fact that it doesn't have this flexibility, and that it needs it in the first place, is an argument against it in my opinion.

    2) Sanity

    There's only so much a human being can reasonably be held accountable for when it comes to spiritual matters. There's a verse in the quran which says allah has not given us two hearts. I personally view this as metaphorical, not literal. We view and believe certain things a certain way. I cannot at the same time believe in the quran while seeing flaws in it.

    3) Reality

    The quran, like all the other holy texts, claims to be the word of god. The way to verify this is testing it, see if it stacks up. Quite frankly it doesn't. Dust devils and jinns, spontaneous human creation, great flood, there's a lot to choose from, but I'll pick a few.

    The story of the arc and the great flood. This would have happened around 4000 years ago. It's quite simply impossible for the number of races, ethnicities and the huge amount of genetic traits to come from one incestuous family in just 4000 years. It cannot happen. Something else that puts a hole in the story is the amount of people who were thriving at this point. God flooded the entire world. Except for the Chinese who were developing at an incredible rate and remained unaffected from a global flood that wiped out every human on the planet. The Japanese were also unaffected. And the Africans. And the Europeans. And the Native Americans. And the Aztecs. And the South Americans. And most of the middle east.  The flood never happened. It's not real.

    The quran teaches that humans were created from clay in a specific creation. If you're to count on the hadiths, then it's just even more ludicrous. We know the first human was not a 90 foot tall clay giant. Even if you don't take the hadiths into account, it also doesn't account for evolution, the proof of which is overwhelming. Nor does it account for the number of people today who have Neanderthal DNA in them from before the Neanderthals went extinct. Everything I know to be proven fact contradicts the claims of the quran. The only logical conclusion I can come to is that it was a story told by ancient societies because they didn't have any answers. Adam never existed. It's not real.

    The sun orbits the Earth...yeah, we've known that's bullshit for a few centuries now.

    It says in the quran that in the embryo/foetus the bones are the first thing to form. "So we made the clot a morsel, so we made the morsel bones, so we clothed the bones (with) meat". This is wrong. The skeleton is actually among the last to be formed. You'd think the all knowing creator of everything would realise this. It's wrong.

    The stars are missiles to be hurled at jinns. Or they hunt demons. I haven't read the quran in a while so I can't remember the exact quote, but you can look it up to see exactly what it says. This is also wrong. The stars are just stars, they do the exact same thing as the star we orbit, the sun.

    Women are defective in intelligence. Coming from a culture where gender mixing is the norm and close relationships aren't looked down upon, I can tell you this isn't true from my own experience. And then there's current trends in school grades, sciences, IQ and employment performance, the fact there are women in MENSA (if you don't know MENSA is like a super genius club, only 2% of the human population globally have a high enough IQ to qualify for membership). Now we live in an age men and women have equal rights, women are on the same level and even starting to out preform men. So I'm going to say this is wrong.

    4) Nonsense

    Do you believe that allah puts a veil over our hearts? If the answer to this is yes, then my reply to that would be that I'm blameless. If the reason I don't see the truth of islam is because allah put a veil over my heart, then it stands to reason I'll be punished (by being sent to hell) for a crime I didn't commit. My reason for saying I'm being punished for a crime I didn't commit is that allah delibertly put a veil over my heart so I would never know him, therefore the fault is allah's, not mine.

    Do you believe nothing happens accept by allah's will? If so then it's the same as above. If nothing happens except by allah's will, then allah made sure I wouldn't believe in him. So again the fault lies with allah, not myself.

    Do you believe islam teaches there's no compulsion in religion? If so does that mean if you don't accept islam as true, then you go to hell? If so, this means that allah has told us something to be taken as truth, and he punishes us for taking him at his word instead of assuming he was lying.

    Do you believe in the virgin birth? If so, can you understand why I might think it's more likely that a teenage girl told a lie rather than a virgin magically conceiving a child, carrying it to term, birthing it, and the child while still an infant speaking?

    Can you also understand why it may be confusing that said infant would only speak once to a few people and refuse to speak again to others, which would cause all doubt in the divinity of allah to be wiped away?

    Here's a situation. Let's say there's something in your house you don't like. It offends you. Let's also say you have the power of a god. Would you A) throw away the thing you didn't like or give it to charity, or B) bring it to life, give it intelligence so it can understand what's happening, enable it to feel pain, and torture it forever and ever and ever? Which is more merciful?

    5) Common sense

    It becomes a common sense issue. Let's say that I'm wrong. Let's say all the things I'm of the opinion are true are wrong. It doesn't change the fact that I find the quran unbelievable. I can't have more knowledge than what's available to me. Let's take evolution. I find it believable. I'm convinced of it. The quran goes against it. I have no reason whatsoever, nothing at all compelling me to believe the quranic story over proven scientific fact.

    Or another, let's take the big bang. I'm convinced by what knowledge I have that before the universe, and after the universe, there was no Earth. This planet did not exist. It took a very long time for our star to be born and for our planet to form. This seems plausible to me. From what I know of physics and cosmology, I can accept this. I have no reason whatsoever to believe that the Earth existed from the start and was ripped apart from heaven.

    Or another. The quran and hadiths suggest a flat Earth. At one point it's spread out like a carpet, at another the Earth is like an ostrich egg (had to pick the bird that buries it's egg and flattens the soil), allah will roll up the Earth like parchment/paper, and on and on it goes. Everything I'm aware of tells me this is wrong. It becomes less and less believable to me. So with all this in mind, common sense tells me that the only truth that lies hidden in the quran is simply the truths of the cultural norms and mindset of that society and time. Historically and psychologically it's interesting, but that's all it is. No more, no less.

    And I have to admit, these aren't even my strongest arguments. I haven't thought about this endlessly, I haven't delved into the theology to throw things at you. The above is just what came to mind as I sit here filling the time on a lazy Sunday evening.


    `But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
     `Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: `we're all mad here. I'm mad.  You're mad.'
     `How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
     `You must be,' said the Cat, `or you wouldn't have come here.'
  • What's your argument?
     Reply #2 - December 11, 2015, 11:30 PM

    Technically the Flood in the Qur'an isn't IIRC claimed to be worldwide. The Qur'anic Noah is a Prophet, not a Patriarch. So his crisis involves only his community, like that "Flash Gordon" hailstorm which afflicted the people of Lot. In that respect the Qur'an does better than the Bible (or those old Babylonian myths which the Bible ripped off).
  • What's your argument?
     Reply #3 - December 11, 2015, 11:35 PM

    I think it's quite clear the quran indicates the same flood story. Waves as high as mountains, unbelievers washed away, no land above water, two of every creature, etc.

    `But I don't want to go among mad people,' Alice remarked.
     `Oh, you can't help that,' said the Cat: `we're all mad here. I'm mad.  You're mad.'
     `How do you know I'm mad?' said Alice.
     `You must be,' said the Cat, `or you wouldn't have come here.'
  • What's your argument?
     Reply #4 - December 11, 2015, 11:40 PM

    1. What is it that you think is wrong with Islam?


    Great post. You can get so many different answers.. But I start with the concept of Hell along with many other people. No way an All-Merciful God can burn people for eternity. And to know that "Allah" is Omnipotent, Omniscient, and All-Powerful.. While knowing that Allah misguided someone like Abu Jahl for example, it doesn't demonstrate that He's All-Merciful at all. A muslim can argue, "Abu Jahl was used as an example so that we can learn to perfect our character and avoid Hell." It just doesn't make sense that Allah would use someone just so others could worship Him.

    And that's another concept in itself. Allah "is deserving of all-worship." It's a bit narcissist. I know muslims will say, "We need Allah, not the other way around" but I feel these statements contradict. Allah is telling us He is "deserving."

    And not to mention all of the doctrines Muslims create.. It's just way too complicated to be a universal truth for all of humanity to follow.

     

    "If you don't like your religion's fundamentalists, then maybe there's something wrong with your religion's fundamentals."
    "Demanding blind respect but not offering any respect in reciprocation is laughable."
    "Let all the people in all the worlds be in peace."
  • What's your argument?
     Reply #5 - December 12, 2015, 12:34 AM

    Dear brother or sister in humanity,

    Slavery. That one can own a human being! That a child or adult can be your property! That the so-called 'divine' law can allow you to rape any female child (aged 9 or above!) or adult without fear of punishment or censure from the law.

    They'll come back with rubbish about how Islam ensures that slave must be well treated (clothed, fed, not beaten etc). More laughably, they'll try to come back with: "Oh what about modern wage slaves?" Wage slavery is bad but at least you can choose who you marry, don't generally expect to get raped by your employer, can leave your house whenever you want etc. There are so many f-ed up rules imposed upon slaves in the classic works of fiqh (irrespective of sect). It's pure dhulm/oppression. Honestly, the arguments in favour of slavery by Muslims are a carbon copy of the slave owners of the Confederacy.

    Forget their sophistry based on fiqh and modern apologetics. Just ask them: how would YOU feel if you were a slave? if your mother or sister were a slave? Look at their faces when they respond and maybe repeat those two questions a few times.

    Slavery, whatever the modern apologists argue, is an established FACT of Islam. If one believes that chattel slavery is immoral then the prophet, his companions and family members (who bought and owned slaves) were immoral. Muhammad owned and gave out slaves like items!

    This slavery thing is across the board, classic Sunni, Shi'i, Zaydi and Ibadi works of fiqh and hadith attest to the fact that slavery is an established sunna of Muhammad. One can't run and hide from this.

    History witnesses that the end of slavery in the Islamic world (although, sadly, it still continues in places like Mauritania) was imposed upon Dar ul Islam. It wasn't because of any original ijtehad on the part of the fuqaha.

    There's a hadith (in both Sunni and Shi'i collections) that the halal and haram of Muhammad are established until the day of judgement. I've paraphrased the hadith but it can easily be found courtesy of Shaykh Google  Wink

    Honestly, there is no moral or philosophical argument that can be made for slavery unless one's intellect and heart are blind to decency. A non slave arguing for the morality of slavery is a violation of the Golden Rule. Although I'd argue that a slave arguing in its favour has been chained (literally) by false consciousness.

    Peace and love (& Liberty, Equality & Fraternity)
  • What's your argument?
     Reply #6 - December 12, 2015, 12:37 AM

    Quote
    No way an All-Merciful God can burn people for eternity.

    Precisely why it's even more important to hold on to the rope of Islam strongly. One could argue "You were warned!".
    Wouldn't you say it's just fair?
    Say, a man approaches a cop and says "Stop, or I'll shoot", and the man keeps approaching. Cop shoots.
    He was warned wasn't he?
    God is also a "just" God. He laid out the rules and accounting people based on them.

    Quote
    Allah "is deserving of all-worship."

    The argument that I heard against it is that we need to worship him so that we stay on the path and feel connected. He doesn't need the worship. It's rather a reminder to us. Could you quote/reference me on where Allah says he "deserves" the worship?

    Quote
    It's just way too complicated to be a universal truth for all of humanity to follow.

    Yes, to obtain a great reward in the afterlife for eternity, the test has to be challenging. Maybe the complexity is a part of the plan of God to test the faith. Logically it fits.

    The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those that cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. - Alvin Toffler
  • What's your argument?
     Reply #7 - December 12, 2015, 12:46 AM

    Quote
    That the so-called 'divine' law can allow you to rape any female child (aged 9 or above!)

    Could you give me a reference to this? I'm not sure of the veracity of that claim.

    Quote
    They'll come back with rubbish about how Islam ensures that slave must be well treated (clothed, fed, not beaten etc).

    Isn't that a step up? I've heard arguments that slaves were really ill-treated during those times so it seems like Islam did one better for the slaves.

    The extended argument that I hear is that Islam set the ball rolling because slavery was so deep rooted within the culture of Arabia that it couldn't have been ended in one chop cold turkey (although I don't understand how idol worship, which seems a lesser evil, was chopped off immediately). Certainly there's a hole in that argument.

    Quote
    Honestly, there is no moral or philosophical argument that can be made for slavery unless one's intellect and heart are blind to decency.

    Absolutely.

    The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those that cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. - Alvin Toffler
  • What's your argument?
     Reply #8 - December 12, 2015, 12:50 AM

    One could argue "You were warned!".
    Wouldn't you say it's just fair?


    It's a malformed analogy to compare a cop standing for justice to shoot someone and a God who tells people how to live or else they'll burn for eternity. Sounds like a Muslim came up with that argument. Why do I say that? Because he's dodging the main point. And one can get into a useless philosophical discussion about cops shooting criminals.

    There's a yes or no answer to this question that I posed. Can an All-Knowing, All-Wise, Omnipotent, and Omniscient God be Merciful and burn people in Hell for eternity at the same time? The answer is No.

    Could you quote/reference me on where Allah says he "deserves" the worship?


    It's in the testimony of faith, "La ilaha ill Allah." The meaning is saying "There is no deity worthy of worship except Allah." I would say that if this Muslim doesn't know where it says Allah deserves to be worshipped, I wouldn't waste my time debating.

    Maybe the complexity is a part of the plan

    I would ask the Muslim if he's "assuming" if complexity is part of the plan or if he knows for certain that complexity is part of the plan. Because when you claim you have "the religion of truth" you can't just tell me that you're going to start guessing with god. You better know for sure.

    "If you don't like your religion's fundamentalists, then maybe there's something wrong with your religion's fundamentals."
    "Demanding blind respect but not offering any respect in reciprocation is laughable."
    "Let all the people in all the worlds be in peace."
  • 1« Previous thread | Next thread »