Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Lights on the way
by akay
Today at 05:55 AM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Yesterday at 07:11 AM

Gaza assault
Yesterday at 04:36 AM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
May 14, 2025, 02:25 PM

New Britain
May 13, 2025, 07:40 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
May 13, 2025, 08:38 AM

الحبيب من يشبه اكثر؟؟؟
by akay
May 10, 2025, 01:22 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
May 10, 2025, 10:45 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
May 10, 2025, 08:24 AM

Pope Francis Signals Rema...
May 09, 2025, 05:32 PM

Kashmir endgame
April 24, 2025, 05:12 PM

عيد مبارك للجميع! ^_^
by akay
March 29, 2025, 01:09 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Thank you, Hassan

 (Read 8363 times)
  • Previous page 1 2« Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Thank you, Hassan
     Reply #30 - February 19, 2009, 05:05 AM

    I am with Emerald that I can not see or detect any source of contradiction.

    A bunch of people came in a transport, and were happily surprised to find a boy in the well. The brothers were not in that transport, since they would not have been surprised at all and probably not happy either.

    As to why Yusuf introduced the 'brothers' in the verse, that is a testament to Yusuf's fallibility and a testament that the Saudi used one of the weaker translators to represent islam to the English speakers.

    Now BMZ, what else was in Abu-Al-Qasim's article that you are still debunking, and what else is in his article that you debunked.




    Actually. I am not doing anything. I just emailed the clown and asked him if he knew how to read and understand in Arabic and he was decent enough to confirm that he does not understand Arabic. Like many others, he bases his silly contradictions on various translations, when he cannot understand.

    Myxtic is doing a great debunking on FFI. Go read and figure.

    Cheers

    Excellent, that is at least honest of him, now what else was in his article that was wrong. Beside this mistake and the contradiction you found in his name.

    Cheers,



    Read his hilarious contradictions here, Baal  Cheesy

    http://mukto-mona.com/wordpress/?p=69

    Translate his name Abul Kasem in English and see what you get?  Cheesy

     
  • Re: Thank you, Hassan
     Reply #31 - February 19, 2009, 07:28 AM

    2:21
    Allah created the mankind; they should worship Him.
    Contradiction: 3:97, 35:15 say Allah does not need mankind and the jinns; He is free of all want.

    This is not a contradiction. Existence of Allah is independent of human and jinn, a Muslim is free not to pray, Allah is not dependent upon his praying. It is Muslim who shpould pray if he wants Jannah.

    Contradiction in Quran should focus upon opposite message in Meccan and Madina suras. Just taking lines, without going through tafsir, makes the attemt laughable. Personally I find medssage of Quran pretty consistent.
  • Re: Thank you, Hassan
     Reply #32 - February 19, 2009, 08:37 AM

    2:21
    Allah created the mankind; they should worship Him.
    Contradiction: 3:97, 35:15 say Allah does not need mankind and the jinns; He is free of all want.

    This is not a contradiction. Existence of Allah is independent of human and jinn, a Muslim is free not to pray, Allah is not dependent upon his praying. It is Muslim who shpould pray if he wants Jannah.

    Contradiction in Quran should focus upon opposite message in Meccan and Madina suras. Just taking lines, without going through tafsir, makes the attemt laughable. Personally I find medssage of Quran pretty consistent.

    +1. Which is why I found Atheist/Christian attempts to "refute" the Qur'an so hard to follow, they didn't read carefully enough to see what they were saying was weak Roll Eyes. If you're going to "refute" something, you should do so on strength, and not flimsiness Tongue.

    I chose to get circumcised at 17, don't tell me I never believed.
  • Re: Thank you, Hassan
     Reply #33 - February 20, 2009, 01:39 AM

    Sarwar's is okay but I strongly recommend Muhammad Asad's translation for readers, who do not know Arabic.

    Thanks Baig. So you're saying that my method of compiling a list of native Arabic speakers and bothering them to within an inch of their sanity via PM is not the best strategy for understanding the Quran then? *adds Baig to the list*

     Wink

    Also, what's with the translators using old english? I seriously hate reading it...it's so tiring lol

    Pickthall's Koran is written in Ye Olde English, Sarwar translation in 1981 is more readable being in Plain English.

    I nominated Hilali Khan because their Koran was written with annotations from Tabari and Ibn Kathir to help explain the verses. It cuts to the point much more clearly.

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Re: Thank you, Hassan
     Reply #34 - February 20, 2009, 02:28 AM

    I prefer Yusuf Ali, footnotes, poetry and all. I find Hilali-Khan so hard to read now, stupid commas. Roll Eyes

    I chose to get circumcised at 17, don't tell me I never believed.
  • Previous page 1 2« Previous thread | Next thread »