Law Lords back Qatada deportation

1« Previous thread | Next thread »
- Nour
- Ex-Muslim
- Misanthropic ex-'revert'
- offline
Law Lords back Qatada deportation
OP - February 18, 2009, 07:32 AM

Well, it's about time they saw some sense...

The Law Lords have given the go-ahead for the deportation from the UK of the radical cleric Abu Qatada.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7896457.stm

Atheism is a non-prophet organization.

The sleeper has awakened - Dune

Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day Give him a religion, and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish!
- Zaephon
- Ex-Muslim
- offline
Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
Reply #1 - February 18, 2009, 04:28 PM

Good riddance already.

Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
- cosmicdancer
- Pub Regular
- offline
Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
Reply #2 - February 18, 2009, 05:44 PM

Yes, good riddance.

It's simple - people like him who hate everything this country stands for and openly supports and expounds extremist ideology - should get out.

End of story.
- Cheetah
- Global Moderator
- offline
Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
Reply #3 - February 18, 2009, 06:47 PM

I have a question. Why is Britain, or any other country for that matter, accepting asylum seekers from Jordan? What's so wrong with Jordan? Its not a dictatorship, its not in the throes of a civil war, its not crippled by poverty, it doesn't stone people to death.

Jordan is not perfect, of course, but nor is Texas. Does Britain accept asylum seekers from Texas? If not, why Jordan?

"Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny." - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
- Rashna
- Pub Regular
- offline
Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
Reply #4 - February 20, 2009, 07:20 AM

Quote from: Cheetah on February 18, 2009, 06:47 PM
I have a question. Why is Britain, or any other country for that matter, accepting asylum seekers from Jordan? What's so wrong with Jordan? Its not a dictatorship, its not in the throes of a civil war, its not crippled by poverty, it doesn't stone people to death.

Jordan is not perfect, of course, but nor is Texas. Does Britain accept asylum seekers from Texas? If not, why Jordan?

I dunno, beats me too. Jordan does have honor killings legalized in their Penal Code, any man can kill not just his wife but any of his close female relatives if he catches them doing something inappropriate. Texas doesn't have that. I do support giving asylum to any potential victim of honor killing, but giving asylum to terrorists or rabble rousers? Thats' totally unneccessary, and puts Britain's own citizens at risk. Not to mention that the people who could die from terrorist attacks masterminded by such scums have as much right to their safety as these people do. IMO, its due to certain far left politicians and viewpoints, who go all out to support the human rights of terrorists and the most extreme fundamentalists, but forget the rights of their victims.

Here's another such man, Mullah Krekar, apparently the "darling" of Norwegian leftists, who oppose his arrest or deportation. This man supports harsh Shariah punishments in Kurdistan, IMO the rights of the women to life whom he'd sentence to stoning for adultery far outweigh his right to asylum in Norway. Unfortunately some Leftists blur the distinction between the victimizer and victim.http://www.pwhce.org/krekar.html

World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
- Saif Rahman
- Ex-Muslim
- Je suis Haram
- offline
Re: Law Lords back Qatada deportation
Reply #5 - February 20, 2009, 08:10 AM

Quote from: Cheetah on February 18, 2009, 06:47 PM
I have a question. Why is Britain, or any other country for that matter, accepting asylum seekers from Jordan? What's so wrong with Jordan? Its not a dictatorship, its not in the throes of a civil war, its not crippled by poverty, it doesn't stone people to death.

Jordan is not perfect, of course, but nor is Texas. Does Britain accept asylum seekers from Texas? If not, why Jordan?

As far as I was aware, Jordan was one of the biggest hosts (per capita) in the world of refugees and not the other way around?

They probably take on a lot of refugees from Iraq, and at one time was crippling the nations infrastructure. Perhaps its refugees from Iraq, who have directly come through Jordan? Just guessing though..

My Book
My Blog
1« Previous thread | Next thread »