Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


New Britain
Today at 09:40 AM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
Yesterday at 09:33 PM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
Yesterday at 01:34 PM

Do humans have needed kno...
January 06, 2025, 09:50 AM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 12:03 PM

Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
December 29, 2024, 11:55 AM

News From Syria
by zeca
December 28, 2024, 12:29 AM

Lights on the way
by akay
December 27, 2024, 12:20 PM

Mo Salah
December 26, 2024, 05:30 AM

What music are you listen...
by zeca
December 25, 2024, 10:58 AM

What's happened to the fo...
December 25, 2024, 02:29 AM

Berlin car crasher
by zeca
December 21, 2024, 11:10 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!

 (Read 44248 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 3 4 56 7 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #120 - March 01, 2009, 02:43 PM


    How can I claim there is a moderate Islam, now being an outsider? Because I practiced it, and have friends who still do.

    I am defensive of muslims as human beings more than I am of Islam. Muslims make Islam. Without Muslims, there is no Islam. Just as there is no Manicheanism or what have you today, because there are no followers to define it.



    There is precious little in the Islam of Muhammad to make a peaceful Islam, but as you rightly pointed out Muslims do make Islam. Now should they also be allowed to plagiarize from more peaceful, egalitarian faiths like the Bahai faith to add onto Islam to claim them as their own hadiths?

    I've read the "Mein Kampf" it did nothing wrong to me, nor to millions of others who read it, they didn't all turn into rabid anti Semites.Does that mean Mein Kampf is abook advocating love for Jews?

    There's unfortunately tremendous amounts of stuff in Muhammad's life which act as real impediments to a nice, peaceful faith.

    Some Unpleasant yet Undeniable Facts
    1)Muhammad Islam's founder was extremely violent with other faiths he came in contact with, he forcefully converted the idolaters by giving them a "convert or death" option & he compelled the Jews to eternal second class status, whereas they had previously enjoyed full rights in Arabia. The founder of Buddhism & Christianity, two other world faiths, did not act similarly.

    2) Islam specifically refers to torment people not as they're Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites or other such currently non existent people but as Jews, Christians or idolaters and gives instructions to oppress & kill them. Jews, Christians & idolaters exist in the world, & this acts as a barrier to equal rights for them.

    Unless Muslims can shape their doctrine into something benign, or outgrow it altogether, there're going to be jihadis who'll believe Islam gives them the right to kill infidels & they need not look too far to find stuff in the Quran & Hadiths to support their actions. Soon they're going to discard plagiarized hadiths which preach peace towards Jews & turn to the authentic hadiths, which advocate murder of Jews.

    The irrescindable violence in the OT nothwithstanding, Christ was a pacifist, there's no such element in Islam.

    How to honestly preach to Muslims that Jihad is non violent  given that every time Bukhari mentions jihad its about violence? Intellectual dishonesty doesn't lead us anywhere, sooner or later many Muslims are going to read the Quran, hadiths & the Prophet's sunnah and then they won't need to work hard to justify similar violence.

    I'm not claiming that there're insurmountable hurdles, but hurdles there are to turn Islam into a basically peaceful doctrine & preaching false stories & ignoring this bitter truth won't help.

    We are to put up or shut up towards what? Does Islam put up with women in miniskirts? Towards cartoonists mocking their faith? If Islam puts up, we too can put up, but as long as Islam demands submission of those who seek to act differently, the rest of the world isn't going to put up with it.



    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #121 - March 01, 2009, 03:55 PM


    How can I claim there is a moderate Islam, now being an outsider? Because I practiced it, and have friends who still do.

    I am defensive of muslims as human beings more than I am of Islam. Muslims make Islam. Without Muslims, there is no Islam. Just as there is no Manicheanism or what have you today, because there are no followers to define it.



    There is precious little in the Islam of Muhammad to make a peaceful Islam, but as you rightly pointed out Muslims do make Islam. Now should they also be allowed to plagiarize from more peaceful, egalitarian faiths like the Bahai faith to add onto Islam to claim them as their own hadiths?

    I've read the "Mein Kampf" it did nothing wrong to me, nor to millions of others who read it, they didn't all turn into rabid anti Semites.Does that mean Mein Kampf is abook advocating love for Jews?

    There's unfortunately tremendous amounts of stuff in Muhammad's life which act as real impediments to a nice, peaceful faith.

    Some Unpleasant yet Undeniable Facts
    1)Muhammad Islam's founder was extremely violent with other faiths he came in contact with, he forcefully converted the idolaters by giving them a "convert or death" option & he compelled the Jews to eternal second class status, whereas they had previously enjoyed full rights in Arabia. The founder of Buddhism & Christianity, two other world faiths, did not act similarly.

    2) Islam specifically refers to torment people not as they're Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites or other such currently non existent people but as Jews, Christians or idolaters and gives instructions to oppress & kill them. Jews, Christians & idolaters exist in the world, & this acts as a barrier to equal rights for them.

    Unless Muslims can shape their doctrine into something benign, or outgrow it altogether, there're going to be jihadis who'll believe Islam gives them the right to kill infidels & they need not look too far to find stuff in the Quran & Hadiths to support their actions. Soon they're going to discard plagiarized hadiths which preach peace towards Jews & turn to the authentic hadiths, which advocate murder of Jews.

    The irrescindable violence in the OT nothwithstanding, Christ was a pacifist, there's no such element in Islam.

    How to honestly preach to Muslims that Jihad is non violent  given that every time Bukhari mentions jihad its about violence? Intellectual dishonesty doesn't lead us anywhere, sooner or later many Muslims are going to read the Quran, hadiths & the Prophet's sunnah and then they won't need to work hard to justify similar violence.

    I'm not claiming that there're insurmountable hurdles, but hurdles there are to turn Islam into a basically peaceful doctrine & preaching false stories & ignoring this bitter truth won't help.

    We are to put up or shut up towards what? Does Islam put up with women in miniskirts? Towards cartoonists mocking their faith? If Islam puts up, we too can put up, but as long as Islam demands submission of those who seek to act differently, the rest of the world isn't going to put up with it.





    The biblical Christ was no pacifist. He had basically a defeatist attitude. He could not do much as he was too weak.

    He came with nothing new, brought nothing new, did nothing and his mission flopped and failed. The legacy he left comprising of 'Jesus said this and the Jews said that' resulted in the treatment of Jews, which no people received at the hands of the Christians for centuries.  Cheesy

    The democracy and freedom of speech that we see now is a remarkable effort by the educated men. Credit does no go to Christianity.

    Muslims have the same problem and millions of the masses are illiterate and uneducated.
    Education will change that. Credit does not go to religion. It will take time. It took more than 1800 years to tame Christianity and teh Christians.  Cheesy Muslims with the modern world may take another hundred years or so.

    If you have read Mein Kampf and did not read Martin Luther's Dirty Little Book on Jews, then you have not read anything. Read this to enlighten yourself.

    http://nobeliefs.com/luther.htm

    Also, take some time and read what Jews have to say:

    http://www.aish.com/literacy/jewishhistory/Crash_Course_in_Jewish_History_Part_44_-_The_Jews_of_Spain.asp

    Cheers
    BMZ

  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #122 - March 01, 2009, 04:00 PM


    Quote

    The biblical Christ was no pacifist. He had basically a defeatist attitude. He could not do much as he was too weak.

    He came with nothing new, brought nothing new, did nothing and his mission flopped and failed. The legacy he left comprising of 'Jesus said this and the Jews said that' resulted in the treatment of Jews, which no people received at the hands of the Christians for centuries.  Cheesy

    The democracy and freedom of speech that we see now is a remarkable effort by the educated men. Credit does no go to Christianity.

    Muslims have the same problem and millions of the masses are illiterate and uneducated.
    Education will change that. Credit does not go to religion. It will take time. It took more than 1800 years to tame Christianity and teh Christians.  Cheesy Muslims with the modern world may take another hundred years or so.

    If you have read Mein Kampf and did not read Martin Luther's Dirty Little Book on Jews, then you have not read anything. Read this to enlighten yourself.

    http://nobeliefs.com/luther.htm

    Also, take some time and read what Jews have to say:

    http://www.aish.com/literacy/jewishhistory/Crash_Course_in_Jewish_History_Part_44_-_The_Jews_of_Spain.asp

    Cheers
    BMZ




    The same "defeatist" attitude that Muhammad took in the Mekkan sources when he was Quraish's bitch?

    A lot of the reformist, humanist and socially progressive ideas found in Christianity are at least based on quotes of Christ and his actions (IE feeding the poor, healing the sick, not stoning women-hint hint). Can we say the same for the Quran? Most/every humanist hadith is a weakly narrated hadith and has little basis in the sunnah, the stronger hadiths are either the ones controlling every aspect of Muslims' lives, the ones talking about hell or the ones telling people to fight.

    Christians developed in stages, you can see the stages clearly marked in history. Islam however is the same today as it was 1400 years ago, except it has a few fringe groups trying to change it.

    I am not a Christian, I have no Christian agenda, but I have said before and will continue to say,  they can't be compared.

    "I am ready to make my confession. I ask for no forgiveness father, for I have not sinned. I have only done what I needed to do to survive. I did not ask for the life that I was given, but it was given nonetheless-and with it, I did my best"
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #123 - March 01, 2009, 04:04 PM



    The biblical Christ was no pacifist. He had basically a defeatist attitude. He could not do much as he was too weak.

    He came with nothing new, brought nothing new, did nothing and his mission flopped and failed. The legacy he left comprising of 'Jesus said this and the Jews said that' resulted in the treatment of Jews, which no people received at the hands of the Christians for centuries.  Cheesy

    The democracy and freedom of speech that we see now is a remarkable effort by the educated men. Credit does no go to Christianity.

    Muslims have the same problem and millions of the masses are illiterate and uneducated.
    Education will change that. Credit does not go to religion. It will take time. It took more than 1800 years to tame Christianity and teh Christians.  Cheesy Muslims with the modern world may take another hundred years or so.

     


    Good points you raised BMZ!  Sadly not in our lifetimes though..

    My Book     news002       
    My Blog  pccoffee
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #124 - March 01, 2009, 04:08 PM

    Quote
    The biblical Christ was no pacifist. He had basically a defeatist attitude. He could not do much as he was too weak.


    A bit like Muhammed in his earlier days.  I've often thought that too, that the early "no compulsion" Muhammed and Jesus sound alike for the simple reason that they had no political power with which to force their followers to obey.

    Quote
    He came with nothing new, brought nothing new, did nothing and his mission flopped and failed. The legacy he left comprising of 'Jesus said this and the Jews said that' resulted in the treatment of Jews, which no people received at the hands of the Christians for centuries


    I thought muslims were supposed to respect Jesus?   Huh?

    Quote
    The democracy and freedom of speech that we see now is a remarkable effort by the educated men. Credit does no go to Christianity.



    Spot on.  Afro

    Quote
    Muslims have the same problem and millions of the masses are illiterate and uneducated.
    Education will change that. Credit does not go to religion


    So what is religion good for then?

    Quote
    It will take time. It took more than 1800 years to tame Christianity and teh Christians.  Cheesy Muslims with the modern world may take another hundred years or so.


    It would take them a lot less if they dumped the most retrograde force in their societies -Islam.

    Christians had to tame their religion in order to advance, and muslims will have to do it also if they want an Enlightenment.

    Quote
    If you have read Mein Kampf and did not read Martin Luther's Dirty Little Book on Jews, then you have not read anything. Read this to enlighten yourself.

    http://nobeliefs.com/luther.htm

    Also, take some time and read what Jews have to say:

    http://www.aish.com/literacy/jewishhistory/Crash_Course_in_Jewish_History_Part_44_-_The_Jews_of_Spain.asp


    Was it Martin Luther who said that in the last days stones will cry out "O muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him."  If not, who was it?









    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #125 - March 01, 2009, 05:01 PM


    The biblical Christ was no pacifist. He had basically a defeatist attitude. He could not do much as he was too weak.

    He came with nothing new, brought nothing new, did nothing and his mission flopped and failed. The legacy he left comprising of 'Jesus said this and the Jews said that' resulted in the treatment of Jews, which no people received at the hands of the Christians for centuries.  Cheesy



    Yeah, exactly as Martin Luther King was a defeatist. Don't mistake moral superiority & capacity to forgive for defeatism. The legacy of Jesus' immediately stopped stoning amongst people who adopted his faith, while Muhammad's followers' still continue with it. Christ also asked his followers not to divorce their spouses except for adultery, whereas Jews could easily divorce their wives for any reason & for no reason, without so much as an explanation. Divorced woman would find herself on the streets, following a sudden & arbitrary repudiation of the marriage by the husband. Muhammad's followers still divorce their wives by uttering Talaq three times, or lately by cellphone messages.  Cheesy

    Incidentally, Christ & Buddha are not defeatists, both chose not to be violent. The Buddha was a prince, he could've marched an army and destroyed other faiths, he chose not to do so. Similarly for Christ, he kept telling his followers to spare others & forgive them, instead of slaughter them.

    That Jesus' followers' chose to ignore his teachings is certainly not his fault. By the way, I'm well aware of the treatment Muslims have given to Zoroastrian Iranians, Buddhists & other idolaters in the sub continent too, so what Christians did in the past doesn't make Islam's past any less vile. The fact that Christians' even in poorer nations have stopped their violent ways' does require an inquiry into why Muslims' couldn't do likewise.


    The democracy and freedom of speech that we see now is a remarkable effort by the educated men. Credit does no go to Christianity.

    Muslims have the same problem and millions of the masses are illiterate and uneducated.
    Education will change that. Credit does not go to religion. It will take time. It took more than 1800 years to tame Christianity and teh Christians.  Cheesy Muslims with the modern world may take another hundred years or so.


    Strawman, the worst of Muslim terrorists are the best educated. The guy who killed  Daniel Pearl had a degree from the London School of Economics, the 9\11 pilots all came from very well educated, prosperous homes, Osama himself is a millionaire, his second in Command Zawahiri is a surgeon. Saudi is rolling in riches, & rolling in homegrown terrorists & jihadis.

    If poverty & illiteracy caused terrorism, where are the Colombian, Peruvian, Chilean terrorists? Where are the Filipino terrorists, except the Filipino Muslims? Why lets focus on the same situation. Where are the Palestinian Christian suicide bombers? Both people suffer oppression, why are Christians more peaceful?

    I'm planning to get hold of Martin Luther King's book, but what Christianity did in the past or Christian Priests preached certainly doesn't exonerate Islam of its genocide in Iran, the sub Continent & other locations. Both Christianity & Islam have violent pasts.

    Cut to the present date. Even comparatively poor  Christian nations like Latin America countries & Phillipines are religiously peaceful, no Crusades originate from there- while oil rich Saudi creates dozens of terrorists.

    Why? Simple. All religions' might've been fertile sources of intolerance, yet there're gradations of violence.Christianity wasn't founded by a forced proselytizer or iconoclast, as Islam is. Christianity might've been violent, yet there're huge chunks in their Holy Books which promote peace, most importantly the founder was peaceful. Muhammad was personally a forcible proselytizer, hence his followers are likewise.
    Christian treatment of the Jews' was a frank violation of Jesus' attitude, Muslim treatment to idolaters, Zoroastrians or the Bamiyan Buddhas was exactly as Muhammad preached & personally practiced.

    This is why Islam lags behind even Christians in Latin America, because there's little in the reservoir of Islam which can cause its followers to be peaceful, even if they acquire the ability to read the Quran. The Quran's message is- be peaceful when you have no other option like Muhammad was in his early career, then immediately slaughter your enemies & forcibly convert them when you get the military might to do so. As education & wealth increase, there'll probably be more rich, literate Osamas & 9\11 pilots, emulationg Muhammad's example, rather than the religion's followers giving up their violent ways-like literacy & personally knowing Christ's example did to His followers.

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #126 - March 01, 2009, 05:19 PM


    Muslims have the same problem and millions of the masses are illiterate and uneducated.
    Education will change that. Credit does not go to religion.



    Even without education & literacy, Christ's example immediately stopped stonings of adulterous women & unilateral repudiation without cause of a marriage by the husband so for these developments which did occur without any Enlightenment, credit goes to Christ.

    With education Muslims will become further familiarized with their Prophet's conduct & sunnah & will strive to emulate it, just like Christ's followers' do. Emulating Christ means turning the other cheek, like Martin Luther King did but emulating Muhammad does mean that one slaughters one's enemies, destroys' the statues of idolaters & kills anyone who objects.

    Christians' who're violent can be put on the right track at least through Jesus' example, what do we do to Muslims who want to destroy the Bamiyan Buddhas? Narrate the story of how Muhammad smashed 360 idols declaring "Truth has come..." & warned people that only those who stays indoors will be safe?Will that be a good deterrent or will that be a further inducement? idiot2

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #127 - March 01, 2009, 11:32 PM

    Quote from: cheetah
    Was it Martin Luther who said that in the last days stones will cry out "O muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him."  If not, who was it?

    Martin Luther appears to have been a hateful and egotistical anti-Semite, but not even modern day Lutherans take his beliefs as Gospel. The opinions of a "reformer" are not comparable with the revelations and commands of a Final Prophet, as BMZ's post implied.

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #128 - March 02, 2009, 03:06 AM

    Martin Luther appears to have been a hateful and egotistical anti-Semite, but not even modern day Lutherans take his beliefs as Gospel. The opinions of a "reformer" are not comparable with the revelations and commands of a Final Prophet, as BMZ's post implied.


    + 1 Afro


    Was it Martin Luther who said that in the last days stones will cry out "O muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him."  If not, who was it?



    + 1  Afro

    The penultimate authority for Christians' isn't Luther just like the ultimate authority for Muslims isn't Ayatollah Khomeini.

    As a non Muslim, Khomeini doesn't make me lose all respect for Islam, however the questionable behaviour of its Prophet sure does.

    Likewise, as a non Christian, what Luther said isn't something which turns me off Christianity permanently, what Christ said sure does. Two millennia years later, I'm sure able to appreciate the Christ of Galilee who stopped a stoning and had the moral capacity (not the same as defeatism) to die repeating, "Forgive them Father..."

    A Christian oppressing others can be put right with Jesus' conduct, a Muslim with... evil

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #129 - March 02, 2009, 04:01 AM

    The biblical Christ was no pacifist. He had basically a defeatist attitude.

    Playing on words is a bit desperate. Like last time when you were making fun of some writer's name.

    He could not do much as he was too weak.

    Not that I believe in miracles, but, as per your books, he raised people from the dead, cured the blind.

    Or by weak you mean he did not lay ambushes to caravans travelling in the desert? He did not claim the fifth of the booty to himself? he did not order his adopted son to divorce his young wife so he can take it to himself? He did not pretty much order his brother-in-the-blood to marry him his blood-niece? He did not bababang all his wives in one night? And then had his wife laugh at him the next day? He did not chop palm trees and bury wells? Is it because Jesus did not perform such actions, that it makes him 'too weak' in your book?

    He came with nothing new, brought nothing new,

    Yes, nothing new. The ideas of goodwill towards humanity existed long before Jesus. Jesus even was taught in Alexandria and you can bet your ass he was taught about Greek philosophies. It just that Jesus chose to teach the good parts from what he learned. Nothing new.

    did nothing and his mission flopped and failed.

    sry, that's where you lost me. Even men who despise muhammad have to agree that he was a very influential figure in history. To say otherwise, would make such men appear stupid and biased.

    The legacy he left comprising of 'Jesus said this and the Jews said that' resulted in the treatment of Jews, which no people received at the hands of the Christians for centuries.  Cheesy

    Jews were around for a very long time and had a lot of chances to receive the 'treatment' from everyone, started from the polytheist romans who flattened jerusalem and raked it under the wheels pulled by buffaloes.


    The democracy and freedom of speech that we see now is a remarkable effort by the educated men. Credit does no go to Christianity.

    Credit goes to ALL the institutions that existed and led to the freedom of speech and democracy. Even in Egypt, the first 2 biggest newspapers were started by christians and jews, before the state decided to nationalize the papers. The First hospital in the world, was invented in Arabia, by Christians. Subsequent hospitals in the Arabic Islamic world, were built by Christians.


    Muslims have the same problem and millions of the masses are illiterate and uneducated.
    Education will change that. Credit does not go to religion. It will take time. It took more than 1800 years to tame Christianity and teh Christians.  Cheesy Muslims with the modern world may take another hundred years or so.

    Credit will not go to islam. But will go to the institutions of outsiders to islam.

    If you have read Mein Kampf and did not read Martin Luther's Dirty Little Book on Jews, then you have not read anything. Read this to enlighten yourself.

    I still have a very long list of better and more useful books to read before i indulge in anything written by those Two clowns.

    As for the jews of Spain, when islam invaded Andalusia, muslims were a minority, they needed to play nice with the majority and ingratiated themselves with other minorities. Once islam self-destructed in Spain, and muslims were kicked out of the lands they invaded, the minorities that ingratiated themselves with islam also got the boot. As expected.


    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #130 - March 03, 2009, 01:13 AM

    Religion can only slow human progress, it can never reverse it over a sustained period of time.  Beliefs are not inconsequential but they adapt according to the times albeit at different rates, but they still do and always will.

    Quote
    I am not sure if religion always slows down progress. Sometimes when you have polytheism, the religions have to compete to be useful. Also sometimes leaders needed to establish a certain culture or a certain method of thought.

    However with polytheism, think about how many wasted hours gloablly are spent practising, researching or even discussing religion (like we are doing here).  If we utilised all these hours, say working out how this earth was formed, or further research into evolution & technology, where would we be today?
    Even between secular nations, healthy national competition would always exist.


    Yes, secularism is the way to go. It just that, the way humanity works, it seems you are better off making sure you have religions that are compatible with secularism.

    To put it differently, let's say I agree with you that religions will always slow down civilisation. In that sense, I am going to suggest to you that sometime in history, we had this non-religious society, that was not slowed down by religion. Such society was able to progress faster then all its neighbours, and eventually overtook them.

    But when I look back, I see no such a non-religious progressive society.

    So today, who am I to come and make the black & white statement that: Religions slow down societies? Where is it that society that progressed  due to non-religiousness?

    Humans need religions, like they need to take a piss 2-3 times a day. It is something biological. So the best we can do, is find a religion (secularism) that just smells nicer and keeps itself out of our way.



    We both agree that islam will reform. But somehow your previous statements gave the impression that you also believe that islam is guaranteed to improve and become better through reform/evolution.

    I have often seen this argument that everything will reform and evolve and become better. And I am very strongly opposed to such an argument.


    No I dont think I ever said Islam was guaranteed to improve and become better through evolution.  Evolution of the blind mole is testament to this.  However given the assumption that media and science are here to stay, I see no other conclusion for the moment.  This does not mean it is definite - I think the biggest threat is actually radicalisation amongst non-muslims. 

    Sorry but, the Two parts in bold, are a contradiction.
    (and plz do not play semantics, i.e. evolution vs media, i do not want to spend 2 paragraphs to make my statement foolproof unless of course your name was sparky).


    If for example their is further heightening of antipathy towards Muslims (e.g. Gert Wilders and his clan) and eventually Muslims are told to pack their bags and leave certain countries, and the West shrugs its shoulders, then the situation could actually get worse.

    Not sure about such an assumption. I think the west will turn on the radicals much earlier then turning against the common muslim. And that will be a positive turn of events. You should see the amount of heat Ghazali took when he was just banned from entering england.


    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #131 - March 03, 2009, 03:27 PM


    I thought muslims were supposed to respect Jesus?   Huh?


    Hello, Cheetah

    That is why I qualified by calling him, the biblical Jesus. There were so many Jesuses around then. Frankly speaking, I do not which one the Church founders picked! 



    Quote
    Was it Martin Luther who said that in the last days stones will cry out "O muslim, there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him."  If not, who was it?


    No one can match that wretched man Martin Luther.

    I don't really know which idiot said that. Must have been some Ibn Hisham type. But it is supposed to be the Gharqad tree, the only Jew-friendly tree to Hadith gossipers,   Cheesy  which will hide the Jews, according to that narrator. Looks like Israel has planted millions of those trees all around.  Cheesy

    BMZ









  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #132 - March 03, 2009, 03:32 PM



    No one can match that wretched man Martin Luther.



    Yes Martin Luther founded that horrible cult called Islam and killed many Jewish/Pagan tribes for refusing to convert. Martin Luther also wrote that gut-wretching document we call the Quran.

    "I am ready to make my confession. I ask for no forgiveness father, for I have not sinned. I have only done what I needed to do to survive. I did not ask for the life that I was given, but it was given nonetheless-and with it, I did my best"
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #133 - March 03, 2009, 03:47 PM


    Not that I believe in miracles, but, as per your books, he raised people from the dead, cured the blind.


    This caught my attention, so I must comment. I will ignore the rest, which may lead to intellectual masturbation, which I do not like. However, I must say it appears that the biblical Jesus was a man of ladies. If you read the Bible carefully, you can make that out. The gospel stories were purged later.

    I do not believe that he gave the sight to blind, made the deaf hear and raised the dead. If he had done that, his followers would have kept a list and the Jews would have accepted him. It is all a biblical hoax, Baal.

    It simply means he opened up their minds, made them listen, understand and made them see the facts, giving those morally dead people a spiritual life.

    Remember the botched up operation, when he allegedly healed a man's sight and the guy said he saw trees walking? Then the biblical Jesus had to spit on his eyes again?

    BMZ


  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #134 - March 03, 2009, 03:58 PM



    No one can match that wretched man Martin Luther.



    Yes Martin Luther founded that horrible cult called Islam and killed many Jewish/Pagan tribes for refusing to convert. Martin Luther also wrote that gut-wretching document we call the Quran.


    Frankly speaking the most wretched document is the Old Testament followed by the most absurd and the most  incoherent document known as the New Testament, which goes against any testimony of yore.

    How many millions of Jews were killed by Muslims? Any guess?

    As far as I know, millions of Jews were killed by the Jesus freaks, the Christ lovers during the Inquisitions. I have not included the six or twenty million killed in the alleged holocaust, again by the Lutherian Cult Christians in WWII.

    BMZ


  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #135 - March 03, 2009, 04:03 PM



    No one can match that wretched man Martin Luther.



    Yes Martin Luther founded that horrible cult called Islam and killed many Jewish/Pagan tribes for refusing to convert. Martin Luther also wrote that gut-wretching document we call the Quran.


    Frankly speaking the most wretched document is the Old Testament followed by the most absurd and the most  incoherent document known as the New Testament, which goes against any testimony of yore.

    How many millions of Jews were killed by Muslims? Any guess?

    As far as I know, millions of Jews were killed by the Jesus freaks, the Christ lovers during the Inquisitions. I have not included the six or twenty million killed in the alleged holocaust, again by the Lutherian Cult Christians in WWII.

    BMZ





    So Muslims didn't participate in the holocaust? Hitler was not a Christian, in fact he had a more favourable view of Islam than Christianity.

    If Muhammad had bombs and missles, there would have been a lot more Jews killed, plus given the world Jewish population at the time, he did kill a lot of them

    Of course even though the Old Testament is a "wretched document", it doesn't change the fact that you follow whole-heartedly another "wretched docuement".

    Regards,

    "I am ready to make my confession. I ask for no forgiveness father, for I have not sinned. I have only done what I needed to do to survive. I did not ask for the life that I was given, but it was given nonetheless-and with it, I did my best"
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #136 - March 03, 2009, 04:35 PM

    Hi BMZ,

    However, I must say it appears that the biblical Jesus was a man of ladies. If you read the Bible carefully, you can make that out. The gospel stories were purged later.



    What next? Biblical Jesus a rapist, pedophile, daughter in law luster, forced proselytizer,? Oh, Christian killings of Jews' doesn't pardon Muslim killings of Zoroastrians in Iran or idolaters & Buddhists in the sub Continent. There're as many violent Muslims in the Middle Ages as well, at least equal to Luther.

    And Luther isn't the founder of Christianity, Christ is, just like medieval Jihadis didn't invent Islam, Muhammad did.

    There's little point in discussing anything with you, continue your intellectual masturbation.Just remember, if you try to emulate your Prophet by destroying some idolaters idols' or killing a hundred Jews' like him, the rest of the world is much more powerful & will give you back as good as it gets Tongue

    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #137 - March 03, 2009, 04:48 PM

    Quote from: BMZ
    I have not included the six or twenty million killed in the alleged holocaust, again by the Lutherian Cult Christians in WWII.


    The Holocaust is one of the best evidenced events in history, there is more evidence for it than there is for the Battle of Waterloo, or the existence of Napoleon.  If you're still describing it as the "alleged Holocaust", and if you still don't know whether the death toll of Jewish victims is closer to six or twenty million, then I suspect your relationship with history is similar to Shaneequa's relationship with evolutionary biology.

    Also, the Nazis were not a Lutheran cult , although no doubt Luther's anti-Semitism was part of the cultural background which led to the Nazis.  You don't really seem to know anything about Luther's status within Christianity, because if you did I'm sure you wouldn't be insulting your Prophet and your Qur'an by comparing them to Luther and his works.

    "Befriend them not, Oh murtads, and give them neither parrot nor bunny."  - happymurtad's advice on trolls.
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #138 - March 03, 2009, 06:00 PM



    No one can match that wretched man Martin Luther.



    Yes Martin Luther founded that horrible cult called Islam and killed many Jewish/Pagan tribes for refusing to convert. Martin Luther also wrote that gut-wretching document we call the Quran.


    Frankly speaking the most wretched document is the Old Testament followed by the most absurd and the most  incoherent document known as the New Testament, which goes against any testimony of yore.

    How many millions of Jews were killed by Muslims? Any guess?

    As far as I know, millions of Jews were killed by the Jesus freaks, the Christ lovers during the Inquisitions. I have not included the six or twenty million killed in the alleged holocaust, again by the Lutherian Cult Christians in WWII.

    BMZ





    So Muslims didn't participate in the holocaust? Hitler was not a Christian, in fact he had a more favourable view of Islam than Christianity.

    If Muhammad had bombs and missles, there would have been a lot more Jews killed, plus given the world Jewish population at the time, he did kill a lot of them


    Regards,


    Complete and utter nonsense, no wonder FFI "opened your eyes". Then again some people are also awakened by Stormfront and other hate sites.

    What was the world jewish population at the time oh learned historian?  And which Muslims participated in the holocaust? who do you got? oh that one Mufti from Jerusalem? wow, well that's what I call evidence..

    You got more? of course that Bosnian unit, how could I forget?

    Of course you dont know about the rector of the Paris Mosque, or the Tunisian Bey, or the Albanian righteous or other examples. In your mind, because the bloodcult is evil, it MUST have had a role in the holocaust, how could it miss the party?

    "By the One in Whose Hand my soul is, were you not to commit sins, Allah would replace you with a people who would commit sins and then seek forgiveness from Allah; and Allah would forgive them." [Saheeh Muslim]

    "Wherever you are, death will find you, Even in the looming tower."
    - Quran 4:78
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #139 - March 03, 2009, 06:04 PM

    Hi BMZ,

    However, I must say it appears that the biblical Jesus was a man of ladies. If you read the Bible carefully, you can make that out. The gospel stories were purged later.



    What next? Biblical Jesus a rapist, pedophile, daughter in law luster, forced proselytizer,? Oh, Christian killings of Jews' doesn't pardon Muslim killings of Zoroastrians in Iran or idolaters & Buddhists in the sub Continent. There're as many violent Muslims in the Middle Ages as well, at least equal to Luther.



    Sure, but whats interesting is that despite having the most peaceful lovey dovey 100% pacifist creed ever invented Christians still managed to equal (and often outdo) those who follow the pedophiliac, ultra-violent, genocidal blood cult.

    How does that happen?

    "By the One in Whose Hand my soul is, were you not to commit sins, Allah would replace you with a people who would commit sins and then seek forgiveness from Allah; and Allah would forgive them." [Saheeh Muslim]

    "Wherever you are, death will find you, Even in the looming tower."
    - Quran 4:78
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #140 - March 03, 2009, 06:07 PM


    How can I claim there is a moderate Islam, now being an outsider? Because I practiced it, and have friends who still do.

    I am defensive of muslims as human beings more than I am of Islam. Muslims make Islam. Without Muslims, there is no Islam. Just as there is no Manicheanism or what have you today, because there are no followers to define it.



    There is precious little in the Islam of Muhammad to make a peaceful Islam, but as you rightly pointed out Muslims do make Islam. Now should they also be allowed to plagiarize from more peaceful, egalitarian faiths like the Bahai faith to add onto Islam to claim them as their own hadiths?

    I've read the "Mein Kampf" it did nothing wrong to me, nor to millions of others who read it, they didn't all turn into rabid anti Semites.Does that mean Mein Kampf is abook advocating love for Jews?

    There's unfortunately tremendous amounts of stuff in Muhammad's life which act as real impediments to a nice, peaceful faith.

    Some Unpleasant yet Undeniable Facts

    2) Islam specifically refers to torment people not as they're Canaanites, Hittites, Amorites or other such currently non existent people but as Jews, Christians or idolaters and gives instructions to oppress & kill them.



    Yeah if they get attacked, not just for fun. What is this nonsense?

    "By the One in Whose Hand my soul is, were you not to commit sins, Allah would replace you with a people who would commit sins and then seek forgiveness from Allah; and Allah would forgive them." [Saheeh Muslim]

    "Wherever you are, death will find you, Even in the looming tower."
    - Quran 4:78
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #141 - March 03, 2009, 11:55 PM

    Quote
    How many millions of Jews were killed by Muslims? Any guess?

    As far as I know, millions of Jews were killed by the Jesus freaks, the Christ lovers during the Inquisitions. I have not included the six or twenty million killed in the alleged holocaust,

    Showing your true colors, BMZ?

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #142 - March 04, 2009, 12:22 AM

    So Muslims didn't participate in the holocaust? Hitler was not a Christian, in fact he had a more favourable view of Islam than Christianity.

    If Muhammad had bombs and missles, there would have been a lot more Jews killed, plus given the world Jewish population at the time, he did kill a lot of them


    Regards,


    Complete and utter nonsense, no wonder FFI "opened your eyes". Then again some people are also awakened by Stormfront and other hate sites.

    What was the world jewish population at the time oh learned historian?  And which Muslims participated in the holocaust? who do you got? oh that one Mufti from Jerusalem? wow, well that's what I call evidence..

    You got more? of course that Bosnian unit, how could I forget?

    Of course you dont know about the rector of the Paris Mosque, or the Tunisian Bey, or the Albanian righteous or other examples. In your mind, because the bloodcult is evil, it MUST have had a role in the holocaust, how could it miss the party?


    Albanians of all faiths banded together to protect the Jews. Some Muslims certainly participated but they were not uniquely distinguished in this:

    Quote
    SENATE RESOLUTION 521--COMMENDING THE PEOPLE OF ALBANIA ON THE 61ST ANNIVERSARY OF THE LIBERATION OF THE JEWS FROM THE NAZI DEATH CAMPS, FOR PROTECTING AND SAVING THE LIVES OF ALL JEWS WHO LIVED IN ALBANIA, OR SOUGHT ASYLUM THERE DURING THE HOLOCAUST

    In 1934, United States Ambassador to Albania Herman Bernstein wrote that, ``There is no trace of any discrimination against Jews in Albania, because Albania happens to be one of the rare lands in Europe today where religious prejudice and hate do not exist, even though Albanians themselves are divided into three faiths.'';

    Whereas based on their unique history of religious tolerance, Albanians sheltered and protected Jews, even at the risk of Albanian lives, beginning with the invasion and occupation of Albania by Mussolini's Italian fascists in 1939;

    Whereas after Germany occupied Albania in 1943 and the Gestapo ordered Jewish refugees in the Albanian capital of Tirana to register, Albanian leaders refused to provide a list of Jews living in Albania, and Albanian clerks issued false identity papers to protect all Jews who traveled to and hid in Tirana;

    Whereas Albanians considered it a matter of national pride and tradition to help Jews during the Holocaust, and due to the actions of many individual Albanians, virtually the entire native and refugee Jewish community in Albania during World War II survived the Holocaust;

    Schumer and McCain, June 27, 2006


    Is Mein Kampf still a best seller in many parts of the Arabic world and North Africa, or what? Is anti semitic propaganda still spread throughout the Middle Easter body politic, from the popular media of Egypt to the textbooks of Saudi Arabia?

    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=322_1233073285&p=1

    "It may happen that the enemies of Islam may consider it expedient not to take any action against Islam, if Islam leaves them alone in their geographical boundaries... But Islam cannot agree to this unless they submit to its authority by paying Jizyah"

    -Sayyid Qutb, Milestones
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #143 - March 04, 2009, 03:57 AM

    Yeah if they get attacked, not just for fun. What is this nonsense?


    If they got attacked Arab Wannabe? Course not! Maybe it wasn't wholly for fun, but there was forced proselytization involved. When Muhammad marched into Mecca, he destroyed all the idolaters idols' declaring, "Truth has come & falsehood disappeared..." & warned people that only if they remained indoors would they be safe. In the 21st century, 18 Saudi hijackers attacked America and killed 3000 Americans. Should Bush, along with a war on Taliban, also march into Mecca, smash the mosques & Kaaba following Muhammad's immortal line, "Truth has come..." Then he could warn Saudis that only those who remained indoors rather than come out to protect their mosques would be safe, wouldn't it be forced conversion?

    As for Jews, in Mecca, previously they had enjoyed full equality, now suddenly Muhammad came & declared himself their Promised Messiah & to add insult to injury, he claimed that if they didn't accept his Messiahship, henceforth they'd have to pay a special tax called the jizya?In Pre Islamic Saudi, Jews intermarried with heathens, thats why Kaab ibn Al Ashraf's father was a pagan, mother a Jew & he was raised Jewish, which was allowed. Khadija's uncle had also converted to Christianity, & the pagans allowed this as well. Today Muslims in Saudi would kill any convert to Christianity. If I declare myself your Guardian Angel today, Arab Wannabe & tell you that if you don't accept me as such, you'll have to pay a tax, would you like it?  little angel Would you accept me, or hope to get rid of me? Baseball bat

    As for idolaters, I'll quote an extract from Ibn Warraq:

    Let us take another example: Sura IX. Here I have tried to use where possible translations by Muslims or Arabophone scholars, to avoid the accusation of using infidel translations. However, many Muslim translators have a tendency to soften down the harshness of the original Arabic, particularly in translating the Arabic word jahada, e.g. Sura IX verse 73. Maulana Muhammad Ali, of the Ahmadiyyah sect, translates this passage as: ?O Prophet, strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites and be firm against them. And their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.? In a footnote of an apologetic nature, Muhammad Ali rules out the meaning ?fighting? for jahada. However, the Iraqi non-Muslim scholar Dawood in his Penguin translation renders this passage as: ?Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their home: an evil fate.?

    How do we settle the meaning of this verse? The whole context of Sura IX indeed makes it clear that ?make war ?in the literal and not some metaphorical sense is meant. Let us take another verse from this Sura, Sura IX.5: ?Then, when the sacred months have passed away, kill the idolaters wherever you find them ?? These words are usually cited to show what fate awaits idolaters. Well, what of the context? The words immediately after these just quoted say, ?and seize them, besiege them and lie in ambush everywhere for them.? Ah, you might say, you have deliberately left out the words that come after those. Let us quote them then, ?If they repent and take to prayer and render the alms levy, allow them to go their way. God is forgiving and merciful.? Surely these are words of tolerance, you plead. Hardly: they are saying that if they become Muslims then they will be left in peace. In fact, the whole sura is totally intolerant; and is indeed the source of many totalitarian Islamic laws and principles, such as the concepts of Jihad and dhimmis, the latter proclaiming the inferior status of Christians and Jews in an Islamic state. All our quotes from the Arabic sources in Part One also, of course, provide the historical context of raids, massacres, booty, and assassinations, which make it crystal clear that real bloody fighting is being advocated.

    First the idolaters, how can you trust them? Most of them are evildoers (IX. Cool; fight them (IX. 12, 14); they must not visit mosques (IX. 18); they are unclean (IX. 28); you may fight the idolaters even during the sacred months (IX. 36). ?It is not for the Prophet, and those who believe, to pray for the forgiveness of idolaters even though they may be near of kin after it has become clear they are people of hell-fire.? (IX.113) So much for forgiveness! Even your parents are to be shunned if they do not embrace Islam: IX. 23 ?O you who believe! Choose not your fathers nor your brethren for friends if they take pleasure in disbelief rather than faith. Whoso of you takes them for friends, such are wrong-doers.?

    Muhammad didn't just fight idolaters when attacked, he destroyed their idols & threatened to kill them if they tried to protect their idols. He also taught the same to his followers- attack & kill idolaters but spare them only if they become Muslim. Levy a special tax on Jews & Christians but spare them if they become Muslims.




    World renowned historian Will Durant"...the Islamic conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. It is a discouraging tale, for its evident moral is that civilization is a precious good, whose delicate complex order and freedom can at any moment be overthrown..."
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #144 - March 04, 2009, 09:13 PM

    Quote from: BMZ
    As far as I know, millions of Jews were killed by the Jesus freaks, the Christ lovers during the Inquisitions. I have not included the six or twenty million killed in the alleged holocaust, again by the Lutherian Cult Christians in WWII.

    This was a mighty Freudian slip, don't you think BMZ? I was looking for a new signature, thanks for providing it.

    You should decide whether you hate Jews or Christians more intensely, just for the sake of coherent argument you know. Blaming "Lutheran Cult Christians" for an "alleged holocaust" is just silly, if the Holohoax didn't happen, how can we blame Lutheran Cult Christians for it?

     Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

    Islam: where idiots meet terrorists.
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #145 - March 05, 2009, 12:47 AM

    Hoist on his own petard. Grin

    Devious, treacherous, murderous, neanderthal, sub-human of the West. bunny
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #146 - March 05, 2009, 03:57 AM

    Because the implications of trying to destroy Islam are far worse.


    How so?  What do you think will happen if Islam were to be destroyed?

    Quote
    Those who are convinced Islam must be destroyed will inevitably attract those are quite happy to use violence and have other agendas too.


    I disagree, wanting to destroy an ideology doesn't necessarily mean that you have to accept those who have other agendas, be they violent or not.
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #147 - March 05, 2009, 11:57 AM

    Because the implications of trying to destroy Islam are far worse.


    How so?  What do you think will happen if Islam were to be destroyed?



    Islam must be destroyed to save humanity + Billions of Muslims who wont let go of Islam = violence

    Whether it is rounding up Muslims to "reeducate" them (this will obviously involve violence) or just plain killing anyone who doesn't play ball - no sane person would say the ends would justify the violence needed.

    wanting to destroy an ideology doesn't necessarily mean that you have to accept those who have other agendas, be they violent or not.


    The "Destroy Islam" crowd attract bigots by the truckload. I only have to look at some of the comments some people have left to know that they consider violence a perfectly acceptable option.

    If you think you can teach people Islam must be destroyed and keep the violent bigots away - you are fooling yourself.
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #148 - March 05, 2009, 12:02 PM

    Because the implications of trying to destroy Islam are far worse.


    How so?  What do you think will happen if Islam were to be destroyed?

    Quote
    Those who are convinced Islam must be destroyed will inevitably attract those are quite happy to use violence and have other agendas too.


    I disagree, wanting to destroy an ideology doesn't necessarily mean that you have to accept those who have other agendas, be they violent or not.


    Welcome Shoeshiner chum. I am glad to see that you found your way here.

    While I agree you with you that we should destroy this religion, I don't see how (anymore) we can. Even if we were to educate and lift Muslims worldwide out of poverty, even the most educated and intellectual person can still believe in violent, retarded nonsense. Therefore it might be impossible.

    Anyway, welcome.

    "I am ready to make my confession. I ask for no forgiveness father, for I have not sinned. I have only done what I needed to do to survive. I did not ask for the life that I was given, but it was given nonetheless-and with it, I did my best"
  • Re: Ex-Muslim Liberals, Please Wait a Minute!!
     Reply #149 - March 05, 2009, 12:13 PM

    Because the implications of trying to destroy Islam are far worse.


    How so?  What do you think will happen if Islam were to be destroyed?

    Quote
    Those who are convinced Islam must be destroyed will inevitably attract those are quite happy to use violence and have other agendas too.


    I disagree, wanting to destroy an ideology doesn't necessarily mean that you have to accept those who have other agendas, be they violent or not.


    Welcome Shoeshiner chum. I am glad to see that you found your way here.

    While I agree you with you that we should destroy this religion, I don't see how (anymore) we can. Even if we were to educate and lift Muslims worldwide out of poverty, even the most educated and intellectual person can still believe in violent, retarded nonsense. Therefore it might be impossible.

    Anyway, welcome.


    And imagine if there was a world-wide movement to destroy Islam. How would it be controlled? How would anyone ensure things don't get out of hand? How would one keep the Christian zealots from trying to engineer their own agenda? Or the Nazis theirs? Or the power-mad authoritarian politicians theirs? Or the just plain shit-crazy whackos theirs?

    And when it's all done who's to stop them turning on the next "Threat to humanity" whatever the guys with power/controlling the militias decide that is?

    Etc...

    Etc...

    The world you are trying to save would be destroyed in the process.

  • Previous page 1 ... 3 4 56 7 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »