Skip navigation
Sidebar -

Advanced search options →

Welcome

Welcome to CEMB forum.
Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email?

Donations

Help keep the Forum going!
Click on Kitty to donate:

Kitty is lost

Recent Posts


Qur'anic studies today
by zeca
Today at 05:41 PM

Dutch elections
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 10:11 PM

Random Islamic History Po...
by zeca
November 15, 2024, 08:46 PM

Lights on the way
by akay
November 15, 2024, 06:36 AM

اضواء على الطريق ....... ...
by akay
November 13, 2024, 05:18 PM

AMRIKAAA Land of Free .....
November 07, 2024, 09:56 AM

Do humans have needed kno...
November 04, 2024, 03:51 AM

The origins of Judaism
by zeca
November 02, 2024, 12:56 PM

New Britain
October 30, 2024, 08:34 PM

Marcion and the introduct...
by zeca
October 22, 2024, 09:05 PM

Tariq Ramadan Accused of ...
September 11, 2024, 01:37 PM

France Muslims were in d...
September 05, 2024, 03:21 PM

Theme Changer

 Topic: Mohammad, the Pedophile

 (Read 138242 times)
  • Previous page 1 ... 20 21 2223 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #630 - January 29, 2010, 08:35 AM

    That's a Shia/Sufi teachings which obviously contradict Quran. According to Quran, prophets are the best of men but they were men, nevertheless. They were NOT infallible.


    Are you suggesting that Sunnis donot consider Mohammed "infallible" and the "perfect example for all mankind"??

    "Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to be amused."
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #631 - January 29, 2010, 08:43 AM

    Then why him? Why was I not made a prophet?


    why not me? I swear I will be a good prophet....
    Hmmmm, I like that.... Now, where are the ladies?

    ...
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #632 - January 29, 2010, 08:53 AM

    why not me? I swear I will be a good prophet....
    Hmmmm, I like that.... Now, where are the ladies?


    I tell you what Ribs, if we lived 1400 years ago we could have all been prophets. It was like the musicians of today, everybody wants to be a rock star. I mean what a fantastic gig; money, power, women, food, territory, worship, respect. Goddamn.

    I say to prophets of the past like I say to the indie-rockers of today, get a real fucking job you bum!

    (ok I'm jealous, I also want to be a hip rock star/prophet)

    These Profits, I mean Prophets telling us the secrets of secrets. How are they any different from any new age gurus? The NLP gurus? The speed reading, self-help and diet gurus?

    Self-proclaimed prophets. I never heard God tell me follow this man. I never had an angel tell me follow this man. But I was told by my parents and their friends follow this man. Fuck that, I follow myself. I declare myself to be a Prophet. I just had a revelation, I will come back in 3 years with a new one.
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #633 - January 29, 2010, 09:01 AM

    I really don't get the "God don't talk to us directly part" at all. Why need a middle man?

    ...
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #634 - January 29, 2010, 09:06 AM

    @ allat & BD

    Quote
    Are you suggesting that Sunnis donot consider Mohammed "infallible" and the "perfect example for all mankind"??


    No. Obviously many Sunnis even worship him. And they can't be blamed when Bukhari's book includes many Hadiths practically deifying him (contradicting the Quran AND other Hadiths which warn against over verenating him).
    http://www.councilofexmuslims.com/index.php?topic=8395.msg208876#msg208876

    anyway, *Uswa Hasana* does NOT mean perfect or infallible... it means *good example*.

    Uswa Hasana was used in verse 60:4 referring to prophet Abraham. It was also used in verse 60:6 referring to *people* who believed in Abraham (e.g. prophet Lut and Abraham's wife, Sarah). And it was used in verse 33:21 referring to prophet Muhammed.

    So Uswa Hasana was used to refer to prophet Muhammed AND to prophet Abraham AND those who were with Abraham.

    Also, according to Quran, we are not supposed to differentiate between the prophets (2:136; 2:285; 3:84).

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #635 - January 29, 2010, 09:07 AM

    @ BD

    Most of the prophets were poor (well, David and Solomon are obvious exceptions).

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #636 - January 29, 2010, 09:08 AM

    Great question. I don't know.

    Because we can't handle it? But Adam and Eve could handle it?

    Oh yes, but that was in heaven, you have a different hearing back there.

    Oh really? You mean our ear drums are different? The wiring in our brain is different? Sort of like them having Dolby TrueHD while we are we stuck here with some shitty Taiwanese copy.


    Or...

    Is it because God doesn't exist?  cool2
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #637 - January 29, 2010, 09:11 AM

    I really don't get the "God don't talk to us directly part" at all. Why need a middle man?


    Better yet why not show Himself?

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #638 - January 29, 2010, 09:12 AM

    @ BD

    Most of the prophets were poor (well, David and Solomon are obvious exceptions).


    Yes because Solomon obviously existed. And David was as powerful in real life as he was in the Bible.
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #639 - January 29, 2010, 09:13 AM

    Better yet why not show Himself?


    True. God has a visible form. And a voice.
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #640 - January 29, 2010, 10:19 AM

    Better yet why not show Himself?


    Hmmmm, I wonder why?  Thinking hard

    ...
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #641 - January 29, 2010, 10:33 AM

    Because then you wouldn't have the ability to choose, and if God didn't want to give you this ability, then He could have created you an angel in the first place.

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #642 - January 29, 2010, 10:43 AM

    Because then you wouldn't have the ability to choose, and if God didn't want to give you this ability, then He could have created you an angel in the first place.


    You know there is no choice right? You have to believe. This is where the "disbelievers are arrogant because they CHOOSE not to believe" argument comes from. It?s inherently tied with the ?free will? argument. But disbelievers come in many shapes and forms. Either disbelieve in Mohammed, Quran, Allah, or any deity. Cute religions always creating logical boxes.

    This is like getting a volunteering job from your boss. A job you desperately need, there is as much choice there as there is choice in believing in the Abrahamic religions.

    Choice is not getting banished or hurt at all. Choice would be saying to my boss no I don?t want to do that job, and there would be no consequences at all. You and I both know there will be consequences, in both cases.

    Stop it with the whole disbelief = pride argument. Its really fucking disrespectful, specially to a person like me. I used to believe and break down in tears when praying. I would surmise that I really, really, really believed in God. And I would still like to believe in a God, but just because I want something doesn't make it true/real.
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #643 - January 29, 2010, 12:20 PM

    @ BD

    Quote
    You know there is no choice right?

     

    Yes, I know. We were given the *ability* to choose to obey/disobey... we were NOT given free will.

    Quote
    You have to believe. This is where the "disbelievers are arrogant because they CHOOSE not to believe" argument comes from. It?s inherently tied with the ?free will? argument. But disbelievers come in many shapes and forms. Either disbelieve in Mohammed, Quran, Allah, or any deity. Cute religions always creating logical boxes.

    This is like getting a volunteering job from your boss. A job you desperately need, there is as much choice there as there is choice in believing in the Abrahamic religions.

    Choice is not getting banished or hurt at all. Choice would be saying to my boss no I don?t want to do that job, and there would be no consequences at all. You and I both know there will be consequences, in both cases.

     

    See above.

    Quote
    Stop it with the whole disbelief = pride argument. Its really fucking disrespectful, specially to a person like me. I used to believe and break down in tears when praying. I would surmise that I really, really, really believed in God. And I would still like to believe in a God, but just because I want something doesn't make it true/real.


    And I never claimed I know what's in your heart or what decisions you made. I even explained to Hassan, in my discussion with him, that I believe that *intentional disbelief* is an oxymoron when used in the broadest sense.

    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #644 - January 29, 2010, 12:42 PM

    Because then you wouldn't have the ability to choose, and if God didn't want to give you this ability, then He could have created you an angel in the first place.


    Cheesy do you realy believe we have a choice? Whatever happened to "worship me or else"?

    ...
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #645 - January 29, 2010, 01:38 PM

    @ RIBS

    copy/paste from above:
    Quote
    We were given the *ability* to choose to obey/disobey... we were NOT given free will.


    A googolplex is *precisely* as far from infinity as is the number 1.--Carl Sagan
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #646 - January 29, 2010, 10:46 PM

    Quote
    2- Aicha could have been grossly exaggerating about her age. Let's not forget that no one corroborated her sory. She's the sole reporter of her age at marriage. If you examine many Hadiths, Aicha's jealousy of the prophet's other wives is obvious. Given the fact that some of the wives of the prophet's were young themselves (~17 years old) I wouldn't be surprised she would grossly exaggerate her own age so as to seem much younger than his other wives.


    If a man has so many wives, all jealous of each other, do you not see that as a seriously dysfunctional family? How can a prophet make his wives jealous to the extent where his wife is insecure enough to lie about her own age? The prophet preached about not lying yet one of his favorite wife turned out to be a liar? You mentioned yourself that polygamy is disrespectful to women yet your beloved prophet practiced it and made all his wives so jealous. How can a man capable of causing such pain to his own wives be worthy of prophethood?

    If you're so devout, how come I am not dead?
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #647 - January 30, 2010, 04:58 AM

    I really don't get the "God don't talk to us directly part" at all. Why need a middle man?


    and we all know how the game 'telephone' goes...  


    boring cheese > orange geese > more chickpeas > worship me  whistling2



    Quod est inferius est sicut quod est superius,
    et quod est superius est sicut quod est inferius,
    ad perpetranda miracula rei unius.
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #648 - January 30, 2010, 06:48 AM

    @ RIBS

    copy/paste from above:


    Obedience must be based on belief, mustn't it? If you have the appearance of a believing Muslim- praying, fasting, etc, but dont have any internal conviction in what you're doing, isnt that kufr? Faith is not something that is controllable. You either have it or you don't. If it was, then so many people on here and elsewhere would not report losing faith as such a painful thing. When does the quran even mention that you might want to believe and even try to make yourself do so, but are unable to? According to the quran, where does this leave you? *Choosing* to obey does not mean fuck all  if you cant back it up with belief.

    "We were married by a Reform rabbi in Long Island. A very Reform rabbi. A Nazi."-- Woody Allen
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #649 - January 30, 2010, 07:43 AM

    Obedience must be based on belief, mustn't it? If you have the appearance of a believing Muslim- praying, fasting, etc, but dont have any internal conviction in what you're doing, isnt that kufr? Faith is not something that is controllable. You either have it or you don't. If it was, then so many people on here and elsewhere would not report losing faith as such a painful thing. When does the quran even mention that you might want to believe and even try to make yourself do so, but are unable to? According to the quran, where does this leave you? *Choosing* to obey does not mean fuck all  if you cant back it up with belief.


    I think what you have said above is the crux of the matter. It really is based on faith. You either have it or you don't. I spent a great deal of my time trying to get this back. It is the gel that holds it together for you. You can reason all you want, but if that mechanism isn't present, then it means nothing.
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #650 - January 30, 2010, 09:58 AM

    @ RIBS

    copy/paste from above:



    Oh I see... I have a choice, I can choose any color I like as long as it is RED?

    Now I understand!  Afro

    ...
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #651 - January 30, 2010, 10:24 AM


    Oh I see... I have a choice, I can choose any color I like as long as it is RED?

    Now I understand!  Afro


    or... pick ANY colour, but if its not RED- you'll be in excrutiating pain forever. But it is ENTIRELY your choice. And if you chose wrong, it was I that led you there, because I'm right... right?  wacko



    Quod est inferius est sicut quod est superius,
    et quod est superius est sicut quod est inferius,
    ad perpetranda miracula rei unius.
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #652 - January 30, 2010, 11:09 AM

    and we all know how the game 'telephone' goes... 


    boring cheese > orange geese > more chickpeas > worship me  whistling2


    lol thats pretty damn good
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #653 - January 30, 2010, 02:22 PM

    and we all know how the game 'telephone' goes...  


    boring cheese > orange geese > more chickpeas > worship me  whistling2


    That would be unintentional deviation from the truth!

    The intentional (with a purpose or an agenda) would go like this:


    boring cheese > orange geese > more chickpeas > fuck me please   grin12

    ...
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #654 - January 30, 2010, 02:27 PM

    Mabur is the name of the coptic castratee that Ali almost killed for the crime of fathering a child from the wife-slave of his older cousin. His name is mentioned in the hadith I posted.



    Quote
    But some historians report that his Copt concubine, Mariya, bore Muhammad a son, Ibrahim, (who died before he was two years old).  Ali Sina, in his newly revised book, Understanding Muhammad, a Psychobiography, has introduced a different tradition reported by Ibn Sa?d and recorded in Tabaqat, Vol. 8, Page 224.  It seems that Mariya also had a Coptic lover named Mabur who was presented to Muhammad as a gift-slave from the ruler of Alexandria at the same time as Mariya.  Ibrahim, then, would most likely be the son of Mabur. While this story is echoed by Al-Tabari (Vol. IX, Para. 1782), the critical difference is that Al-Tabari?s account insists that Mabur was a eunuch.  Al-Tabari?s account is as follows: Muhammad, hearing that it may have been Mabur that fathered Ibrahim, sent Ali to kill him.  When Mabur realized what Ali intended to do, he lifted his shirt and showed Ali that he was ?completely castrated, not having anything left of what men [normally have]?, so Ali refrained from killing him.

     

    Now, this story makes more sense if one could imagine the ensuing dialogue:

    Ali:  Mabur,  rumor has it that you are Mariya?s lover and that you that fathered Ibrahim.

    Mabur:   Maybe I did, and maybe I didn?t.  What are you going to do about it?

    Ali: The Prophet ordered me to kill you.

    Mabur:  OK, if you kill me, then everyone in Medina will conclude that I was, indeed, the father of Ibrahim.  They will also realize that Muhammad, with eleven wives, hasn?t gotten a single one of them pregnant.   Kill me, and Muhammad is impotent.
     
    Ali:  You?ve got a point, but how does this get resolved?
     
    Mabur:  You tell Muhammad that you saw me naked, and I was like an empty cup ? no tea-bag and no stirrer, either.  He wouldn?t want you to kill an innocent eunuch, would he?
     
    Ali: But you?re not a eunuch, are you?
     
    Mabur:  And Muhammad isn?t impotent, is he?

    Ali:  OK, but you keep away from Mariya.  Any more kids from her, and  Muhammad will chop both of our necks.

    For all the sex in the Quran and in Muhammad?s life, he had little to show for it.  Only one surviving child, and no sons to carry on his legacy.  The Sunni vs. Shiite rift is a direct consequence of Mohammad having no heir-apparent.


    http://www.annaqed.com/en/content/show.aspx?aid=16096

    Quote
    When ol-As b. Wa'el derided the Prophet (after the death of his son Qasem) for having no heir, verse 3 of sura 108 (ol-Kawthar) came down: "It is your derider who is sterile."

    http://ali-dashti-23-years.tripod.com/



    Quran 108 Abundance Al-Kawthar

    (1) Surely We have given you Kausar,
    (2) Therefore pray to your Lord and make a sacrifice.
    (3) Surely your enemy is the one who shall be without posterity,  إِنَّ شَانِئَكَ هُوَ ٱلْأَبْتَرُ ﴿٣﴾
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #655 - January 30, 2010, 02:37 PM

    That would be unintentional deviation from the truth!

    The intentional (with a purpose or an agenda) would go like this:


    boring cheese > orange geese > more chickpeas > fuck me please   grin12


     Cheesy
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #656 - January 30, 2010, 11:05 PM

    @Debunker

    The best of greetings, the best of meetings upon you, my brother/sister in the Faith.


    I think that such narrartions are

    1- anti-Islamic propaganda fabricated by hypocrites pretending to be Muslims. ...

    OR

    2- Aicha could have been grossly exaggerating about her age. ..

    OR

    3- Some deviant (Ummayyad) Caliph had a thing for little girls and had such hadiths invented to justify his behavior.
     
    I am NOT a Quran only Muslim. I simply recognize my right to reject Hadiths from within the work of Bukhari et al, just like they've given themselves the right to reject hundreds of thousands of Hadith...


    Thank you for your reply -- it was very helpful. Of course, an implication of point 1) would be that Imam Bukhari himself is a participant in disseminating anti-Islamic propaganda. After all, he used his own judgement to assemble this collection, rejecting some and keeping others. The "guilt" would then presumably dissipate, as future generations of scholars put their trust in his judgement.

    This might explain why he was occasionally chased out of the towns he visited -- on charges of heresy from angry local sheikhs.

    Of course, no one will really know who Bukhari was, what the precise nature of his judgement was in defining this collection or even precisely why he was unpopular when he visited the towns.

    There are a great number of possibilities regarding the identity of this peculiar Imam and the motivation behind his strange and difficult compilation.

    In such cases, it is often constructive to to follow Harold Bloom's "creative history" -- for example, in his "Book of J", he "imagines" that the author of the J fragment of Torah was a woman in the court of Solomon -- and Sigmund Freud "imagined" that Moses was an Egyptian mystic who taught the Jews monotheism but was then killed by them, an event they subsequently repressed in the book of Torah itself. These wild speculations are made blatantly -- but are actually just as valid as any other, more sedate (and boring) speculation, as we really will never know the actual history of events ...

    And so I say that, coming from the town of Bukhara, a melting pot of Jewish Mysticism and Central Asian Shamanism, Imam Bukhari (like his father) was in fact a converted Jew, who set out to gather into one collection something along same lines as the Talmudic hadiths developed in the aftermath of previous prophets. On his travels, he came across many initiates into the Secret of the Abrahamic lineage -- converted Kabbalists and Ebionite Gnostics, in particular -- who supplied him with their Difficult Tafsir of Prophecy. Some had a direct contact with Prophecy and the Sahaba -- others had a "direct" (Uwaisi) contact with Prophecy and the (theomorphic) Sahaba -- but nonetheless, all the hadiths Imam Bukhari are authentic chains of transmission.

    All the crazy stuff that perplexed the uneducated masses of Islamic scholars that followed -- from stuff about witchcraft made on Muhammed to make him hallucinate sexual relations with his wives, to the truth of children resembling their mother or father depending on discharge, to Musa's scrotal hernia problems, to flies dipped in drink to cause and cure disease, to 9 year old marriages -- are messages that employ a near IDENTICAL idiom to that found in Talmud and Kabbalah. Bukhari's ancestors taught him this idiom, and his choices in compilation were guided by this Gnosis.

    This is not to say there is no new Wisdom to be found within the narrations -- or that they are a simple cut-and-paste job. Like the Qur'an itself, they amplify the knowledge that came before, but add a final movement of reflection and differentiation necessary for what a friend of mine in a different forum referred to as a post-modern awakening -- an awakening that has not yet come fully in fact, but that will come from this strange time capsule.

    I can't prove any of this -- and am not even claiming it to be an historical fact at all. It's just a story (like the hadiths themselves) that is meant to jog one's mind to the fact that all is not as it seems.

    But I've been to Bukhara, seen the ancient Synagogues, participated in Central Asian shamanism: and had a grasp of the crazy climate from which he came. Much further away from Wahabi Saudi A, and more like 1990s rave culture, in its combination of shamanist posturing and the possibility of a New way of externalising the infinite possibilities of our internal reality ... but the difference being -- the language Bukhari had learnt was one (like my story about Bukhari) that was "imaginary" (not historical), providing a way to enter into this space ...

    I don't know where did you get that the Hebrew rule set the minimum age for marriage at 12? The majority of Jewish scholars agree that Rebecca married 40 years old Isaac when she was 10 years old. Other Jewish scholars think Rebecca was *3* years old when she married Issac.

    http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/view.jsp?artid=146&letter=R


    I'm glad you brought this up. The link to our discussion (and my blog piece) on the age of Aisha is important ... I don't expect anyone to follow what I will say here -- apart from grasping that there is an alternative way of reading this stuff -- a Sufi understanding. The general Rabbinic consensus is 12 -- for the same reason that, in Kabbalistic understanding, the Woman takes 12 months to be born, while Men take 9 months (although Moses was 7). Aisha took 9 years, and so was premature -- hence theomorphically, she is imbalanced toward "Judgement" and "Law" -- if she was married at 12, she would be balanced (a complete Feminine) to "Love" as well as "Law". Her imbalance caused her to engage in the fitnah -- and also is the reason why so much Shariah derives from her. In a way, she IS Shariah to the Prophet. Nevertheless, despite the problems that resulted from her imbalance, we are told she was the best of women of her generation, and Prophecy dies in her arms. Why? Because, while he was alive, she was able to contain his Nur through 9 phases, though being premature and not yet 12. Shariah (the virtual reality of our existence) is able to contain the Nur of Muhammed -- this has been proven in Aisha's age at marriage. But -- the story of the fitnah must not be ignored -- we are all premature proto-Aishas, and need to become 12 years in order to finally reconcile and awaken the Global Message of Islam.

    (Didn't I tell you that I am loco?)

    Love and Light,

    The Tailor

    The Divisions of Love, second album by my Cabbalacore band, the Friends of Design, out now:

    https://vimeo.com/110528857
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #657 - January 30, 2010, 11:50 PM

     Cheesy

    I liked the history on Bukhari, need to read up more on that, what book/links do you recommend?

  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #658 - January 31, 2010, 08:17 AM



    Where did I say *all*? According to Quran, all of Quran was *inspired* by God. Also, according to Quran the prophet WAS fallible! He sinned and he was ordered to ask for forgiveness for his sins (even though God already forgave his past and future sins).

    The Quran says he was a human like but a messenger of God too. All of that is in the Quran.

    We already been over this Debunker. The sins of Muhammad are mickey mice sins. Like Muhammed being chastised for looking away from a blind man and stuff like that. Sins that are irrelevant and asanine. Like the monk that cried over stepping on a bug. Sins that make the human seem so pure and up there. The sins the koran talks about in the koran, are sins that help mohammed achieve a holier-than-thou position among humans.

    Are they infallible? of course not, but the sins the koran talks about are laughable yet purposeful.

    "Ask the slave girl; she will tell you the truth.' So the Apostle called Burayra to ask her. Ali got up and gave her a violent beating first, saying, 'Tell the Apostle the truth.'"
  • Re: Mohammad, the Pedophile
     Reply #659 - November 10, 2011, 08:45 AM

    If it was common then why was abu bakr hesistant to give aisha to the prophet

    take a look at this link  written by ali sina from faithfreedom

    http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/sina/ayesha.htm
  • Previous page 1 ... 20 21 2223 Next page « Previous thread | Next thread »